Education And War Time Experience In Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse Five

1610 Words4 Pages

The novel Slaughterhouse-Five is different from most, due to the lack of chronological order in the narration. The narrator kicks off the book by discussing his timely desire to write about his experience in Dresden back in World War Two. However he has already spent countless hours writing thousands of pages on this puzzling topic, which have all been discarded. In order to fulfill his wish of completing such novel, he then calls his old war buddy, Bernard V. O’Hare. After agreeing to get together with the intentions of remembering their days in Dresden, the story begins. The story follows the main character Billy Pilgrim who often jumps back and forth through time; this is what ultimately creates the lack of chronological order in the story.
The story is told by narration, however such narrator who evidently is involved throughout the story is never entirely revealed. However with further research in the time period, and other important factors of the story, this gap can be closed. By implementing the traditional analytical approach one vividly notices the sheer similarities of education, occupation and war time experiences, who the author Kurt Vonnegut and the narrator of the story both share; deeming Vonnegut the narrator
The author himself goes through many experiences with war in his own life, due to World War Two which he often uses as inspiration for his novels. Many people think, “Vonnegut is best when relating his wartime experience” (Clark). This hints at the possibility of Slaughterhouse-Five being a product of the true events of Vonnegut’s war time. So when one looks at such accusation further, it is clear to the reader the abundance of talk about the war the narrator so evidently speaks about. Here is one of many times this takes place in the novel when the narrator explains, “We were formed in ranks, with Russian soldiers guarding us; Englishmen, Americans, Dutchmen, Belgians, Frenchmen, Canadians, South Africans, New Zealanders, Australians, thousands of us about to stop being prisoners of war” (Vonnegut, 7). Ultimately this shows how the narrator was indeed a prisoner of war, which gives one an opportunity to make any connections with the author. Ironically the author himself, he’s experienced being a prisoner of war. This is stated clearly, “He was sent as a POW to Dresden” (Allen). This creates a clear similarity which is continuing to insinuate that the narrator and Vonnegut are one, making this accusation more and more concrete. This continues however after

Open Document