Cognitive developmental theorists in educational learning, such as Paiget, assist in the understanding of why some gifted students underachieve during adolescence. Such theorists contend that gifted students have faster and more vigorous cognitive movements during this period of growth that involve higher stages of development and are beyond formal operational thought (Cohen L.M, 1993). For example, the gifted student may have the ability to process new learning at faster rates, show deeper emotional sensitivity and understand complex concepts more easily than their peers. Such facto...
First, however, one must have a clear notion of what is meant by giftedness. Only the top 2-5 % of children in the world are truly gifted. These children are precocious, self-instructing, can intuit solutions without resorting to logical, linear steps, and have an incredible interest in an area or more that they focus so intently on, that they may lose sense of the outside world (3). Early reading and development of abstract thought are typical characteristics as well. The acceleration of ment...
What makes a person gifted has been debated historically and continues on today. The debate has been influenced by politics and culture, which impact how gifted children are educated. The three articles discussed in this paper explore the origins, development, social-emotional impact, and politics of giftedness.
...gh-functioning individuals in that domain. Further, giftedness can be viewed as developmental, in that in the beginning stages, potential is the key variable; in later stages, achievement is the measure of giftedness; and in fully developed talents, eminence is the basis on which this label is granted. Psychosocial variables play an essential role in the manifestation of giftedness at every developmental stage. Both cognitive and psychosocial variables are malleable and need to be deliberately cultivated (L. Coleman & Cross, 2005, Dai & Coleman, 2005a; Mayer, 2005; Olszewski-Kubilius, 2000).
I also chose this post because it enabled me to look deeper into this ongoing debate about the consensus of gifted education. Borland (2012) stated that, “intellectual ...
By almost any measure, the education system in the United States is broken. This issue has been approached from many angles. From politicians to academic researchers, education has been a pressing topic for decades and one for which no viable ideas have been forthcoming. Most often, the solutions offered have involved standardized testing or pouring more money into a system that is fundamentally unworkable. The essential issue is that traditional approaches to teaching and learning have become outdated for today’s student body and for modern culture. Adopting a more progressive approach to the classroom is the best way to transform the education system. The theory of Multiple Intelligences (MI), first introduced by Howard Gardner three decades ago, is an example of a project-based learning style of teaching and assessment (Barron & Darling-Hammond, 2008). It is comprised of nine different “intelligences,” or ways that students learn, and it offers a more comprehensive way to determine an individual student’s intellect (Gardner, 2011). “Only if we expand and reformulate our view of what counts as human intellect will we be able to devise more appropriate ways of assessing it and more effective ways of educating it” (Gardner, 2011, p. 4). Using MI to help evaluate each student’s aptitude will help reach more students, and better prepare them for the world outside the classroom by: emphasizing cultural diversity, teaching real-world skills, empowering students, and bolstering the self-worth of individual students.
The bulk of legal cases are in the realm of special education, but only time will tell if gifted education will challenge our highest courts. For now, district administrators and teachers must continue with due diligence to meet the needs of gifted learners, but they must always stay abreast of rulings from the Office of Dispute Resolution. By following the due process hearings, districts can identify commonalities with their own district practice and adjust as needed. Gifted education enrollment numbers are dwarfed by the special education numbers, but the parents of gifted students are no less vocal and often have more resources available to them. Regardless of what the law has said or will say, it is the school’s responsibility to grow all learners, but realize that is our gifted learners who have the innate ability to truly make a difference in our
It has been suggested by psychologists that giftedness from the teacher’s point of view depends on a combination of high ability, high creativity and high commitment. Gifted children show early signs of intellectual superiority. Even during infancy and early childhood, the show larger attention span, good recognition, memory, preference for novelty, sensitivity to environmental changes, and early appearance of language skills. To equate giftedness with brilliant academic performance is not correct. Each gifted student possesses different strengths, personalities and characteristics. Some of them are, advanced logical thinking, questioning
In the article, the term “gifted” is a very precise, yet very broad; it is more than a number on an IQ test, hence is termed by the U.S Department of Education as children and youth with outstanding talents and accomplishments, in comparison to others of their age, experience of environment.
One of the most controversial things about gifted and talented education is the criterion educators use to identify the gifted and talented. In the past, a student’s intelligence, based on an I.Q. score, was considered the best way to determine whether or not they qualified as gifted. As a result of using this method of identification, many gifted and talented students are not discovered nor are they placed in the appropriate programs to develop their abilities. Talents in the arts or an excellent ability to write are not measured on an I.Q. test but are abilities that may certainly qualify a student as gifted or talented.
Many qualities and abilities can be defined as gifted, such as academic strengths, musical abilities, and athletic talents. Taylor Swift, for example, may show talent in her musical skills, but show no giftedness in academic abilities; however, giftedness does not have to include all aspects of its definition, so Taylor still classifies as gifted. Like Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences, an individual may have strengths in one area, such as musical intelligence, or in several areas, for example musical intelligence and spatial intelligence (Gardner et al, 1996). Furthermore, these gifts rarely appear out of nowhere. Proficiency in skills comes from hard work and persistency, and gifted individuals must practice and exercise their abilities in order to become talented (Winner, 2000). I believe giftedness is not unitary, but rather simply a broad description of a talent or great strength in one or several areas. Since so many categories of giftedness exist, I believe that anyone who works hard enough and continues to look can find something in which they could consider themselves gifted. For example, some kids who struggle with most sports may think they struggle at all sports; however, if they were to keep looking and try new activities, they might find the one sport at which they
Sylvia Rimm and Linda Emerick both discuss the reversal of underachieving gifted students. Both articles address the characteristics and/or behavioral patterns of gifted underachievers as well as how the process of underachieving may be reversed.