Economic Mobility In America

1153 Words3 Pages

As life continuously becomes difficult in America, U.S Citizens can still find optimism in the American dream. A dream that applies to all regions, races, and religions. It is the idea that, every American has equal opportunities to find success and happiness through hard work. The American dream doesn't necessarily mean going from poverty to absolute wealth. Things simple such as owning a home or affording a college education is a precious dream to many Americans. The flaw in that statement are the two words “equal opportunities”. The American dream is filled with false hopes and promises. Individuals who are working hard, never even earn the chance to find their happiness. America’s poor economic mobility is the reality American should face …show more content…

Plain and simple, Americans are not aware of the facts. In Freeland’s essay “Plutocrats” she states that “The reality today is that the rich—especially the very, very rich—are vaulting ahead of everyone else. Between 2002 and 2007, 65 percent of all income growth in the U.S. went to the richest 1 percent of the population.” (para2) As unbelievable as it sounds, it is all true. In other words, over half of the money made by all 318 million people, was made by only 3.18 million. This overwhelming gap leaves the rest of America will little to no hope of elevating up the economic ladder. In “Economic Mobility Hasn’t changed in Half-Century in American, Economists Declare” Jim Tankersley states: “Because there’s so much more inequality, people near the bottom tend to stay near the bottom, and that’s much more consequential than it was 50 years ago.” (para 6) In the span of 50 years, the regular citizen has had no improvements while the elites became …show more content…

In “The Death of Horatio Alger” Krugman makes this accusation against political leaders. “Our political leaders are doing everything they can to fortify class inequality while denouncing anyone who complain.” Many of the political leaders are supported by the wealthy. Even their careers are completely fueled by the funds of the rich. In “We are the 99.9%” Krugman states the most common response used by the elites. He states:” the super-elite are “job creators” — that is, that they make a special contribution to the economy” (para 7) Therefore these “job creator” should earn a tax break. However, the focus would be placed on the elites or the top 1%. An increase of tax for these individuals should hurt them financially. However, the republicans still support the idea of giving the wealthy tax cuts. The amount of power that they possess allows them to bend the rules to their advantages. Some of these individuals are directly responsible for thousands of jobs forcing the government to treat them differently. This is very similar to the point made by Thomas L. Friedman in his essay “Globalization the Super Story". When discussing the power of global markets Friedman states:” The United States is the dominant player in maintaining the globalization game boards, but it is hardly alone in influencing the moves made on that game board. (393)” This leaves the wealthy with the

Open Document