Early Homo Sapiens: Uniregional versus Multiregional Theory

2043 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Evolution of human beings

As fossil evidence has shown, we see that all pre-human forms, from Proconsul to Australopithecines, have resided in parts of Africa. We don’t see any movement out of Africa until the appearance of the Homo erectus fossils. These fossils have been found not only in Africa, but have also been found in parts of Europe and Asia. This is when scientists begin to disagree on how these pre-modern humans spread from Africa to other continents. Some scientists believe in the hypothesis known as the Multiregional Theory. This theory states that Homo erectus left Africa about two million years ago and from there migrated to Europe and Asia. These H. erectus then evolved, simultaneously, into Homo sapiens, or the modern looking and culturally evolved humans we are today. Another hypothesis that has been presented is the Uniregional Theory. This theory states that although Homo erectus did migrate out of Africa into these areas, Homo erectus evolved into Homo sapiens in, and solely in Africa. These H. sapiens then traveled into the other continents and replaced the H. erectus and Neanderthals that were living there. More fossil evidence has been found to support the Uniregional theory at this time and is the most likely option for human migration. Scientists try to prove these theories using fossils found in different locations, studying what DNA can be found in the fossils, and they also look at other evolutionary theories for possible answers and clues to the peopling of the continents. “Multiregional evolution requires the "simultaneous" or "convergent" evolution of modern humans in different isolated populations,” (Hawks and Wolpoff 89) and is based on the idea that earlier hominids, such as Australopithecines, e... ... middle of paper ... ...d Milford Wolpoff. "Sixty Years of Modern Human Origins" American Anthropologist 105.1 (2008): 89-100. Web. 25 Mar 2011. 6. Johanson, Donald. "Origins of Modern Humans: Multiregional or Out of Africa." ActionBioscience.org. (2001): Print. 7. Lestrel, P, F. Ohtsuki, and C.A. Wolfe. "Cranial vault shape in fossil hominids: Fourier descriptors in norma lateralis.." Journal of Comparative Human Biology 61.5 (2010): 287-313. Web. 25 Mar 2011. 8. Lieberman, Leonard, and Linda Jackson. "Race and Three Models of Human Origin." American Anthropologist 97.2 (1995): 231-42. Web. 25 Mar 2011. 9. Shang, H, H Tong, S Zhang, F Chen, and E Trinkaus. "An early modern human from Tianyuan Cave, Zhoukoudian, China.." Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104.16 (2007): 6573-8. Print. 10. Stone, L., & Lurquin, P.F. (2007). Genes, culture, and human evolution: a synthesis. Blackwell Publishing.

Show More
Related

  • Proof that Humans Interbred with Neanderthals

    1346 Words  | 3 Pages

    Over the last few hundred years, more and more has been added to the world’s fossil collection, fossils from all over the world. New theories have been created and old theories have almost been proven about the evolution of man. For example, we have proof that different species of man existed with certain types of DNA sequences and instincts, some we may not have anymore, or some that other species did not have back then. Even though it is subjected to much debate, one of the most widely accepted theories however, is that Homo sapiens interbred with the slightly more primitive species of man, the Neanderthal.

    Read More

  • Ardipithecus Ramidus Kadabba: The Oldest Hominid

    1182 Words  | 3 Pages

    Wilford, J. (2004).Another Branch of Early Human Ancestors Is Reported by Scientists. [Online], March. Available at: http://gateway.proquest.com [Accessed 28 March 2004].

    Read More

  • Lucy, discovered by Donald C. Johanson and Tom Gray, is Our Oldest and Most Complete Human Ancestor

    975 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1972, a group of researchers led by Donald Johanson, founding director of the “Institute of Human Origins” of Arizona State University, sets out to discover a hypothesized human ancestor, Lucy, in the Hadar Formation in Ethiopia. Donald Johanson’s group hypothesized the existence of a biped human ancestor, with the great ability to walk upright like humans, which of Lucy having a relatively small cranial capacity like that of an ape. This creature, Donald Johanson hypothesized, would be a “missing link” between the apes and humans, and prove that the populated humans developed the ability to walk upright before developing higher intelligence, which was opposed to the common b...

    Read More

  • Herto Homo Sapiens and the Origin of Man

    1465 Words  | 3 Pages

    Three incomplete skulls of Homo sapiens were discovered in 1997. Bruce Bower’s article “African Legacy: Fossils plug gap in human origins” discusses the fossils. These findings are important because according to the discoverers, they are the oldest known fossils of modern people. The skulls were found in Herto, Ethiopian located in eastern Africa. The fossils are dated between 154,000 and 160,000 years ago.i[1] The fossils were dated radioisotopically.ii[2] Since the fossils are the oldest known fossils of modern people, it is probable that these hominids represent the immediate ancestors of humans that are anatomically modern. Tim D. White’s (et al) article “Pleistocene Homo sapiens from Middle Awash, Ethiopia” describes the discovery of the Herto fossils and the research of the artifacts in great detail.

    Read More

  • Evolution and The Island of Doctor Moreau

    1421 Words  | 3 Pages

    Myers, provider of source material for Edie Heydt's notes from "Human Origins," fall 1997, Alfred. Much of the material in the notes is paraphrased, and the original information sources are unknown.

    Read More

  • Homo Sapiens: The Regional Continuity Theory And The Replacement?

    703 Words  | 2 Pages

    As it stands in the scientific community, there is currently a debate between two factions of anthropologists, and two theories, regarding the evolution of modern humans or Homo sapiens: The Regional Continuity Theory and the Replacement (or “Out-of-Africa”) Theory. In this paper, I will attempt to define both theories, evaluate the evidence and merits of both, and then draw a personal conclusion as to which theory I find the most plausible and likely to be correct out of the two.

    Read More

  • Examining Evolution from the Perspective of Biological and Cultural Anthropology

    762 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alfred L. Kroeber once said: “Anthropology is the most humanistic of the sciences and the most scientific of the humanities.” For centuries, anthropologists have studied various cultures in search of answers about humanity. What are other cultures like? How are other cultures different from ours? Why are they different? Anthropology originated from the Greek words Anthropos (human being), and -logia (study). In the field of Anthropology, there are four sub-fields: Biological, Cultural, Linguistic, and Archaeological. Each of these sub-fields can be beneficial to study the theory of evolution, and all of the sub-fields are important in their own respect. However, the biological and cultural fields are, perhaps, more significant than the others regarding evolution.

    Read More

  • Modern Human Origins: The Multiregional Theory

    1302 Words  | 3 Pages

    Multiregional Evolution: a theory that suggests modern humans evolved from individual populations of Homo erectus throughout Europe, Asia, and Africa during the middle of the Pleistocene epoch. Its supporters claim that premodern humans, Homo erectus, migrated from Africa to Europe and Asia and that gene flow amongst these population is responsible for the evolution of modern Homo sapiens (Jurmain, Kilgore, Trevathan, and Ciochon, 2013). This theory was developed by Wolpoff and his colleagues in the 1980s and is a topic they continue to explore today (2000). There are many who discredit this theory though. They believe that the multiregional model does not prove how all of these separate populations remained genetically similar to one another if they all evolved separately. The works of Pearson (2004) and Stringer and Andrews (1988) explore this opposing view to the multiregional model.

    Read More

  • The Debate Over the Origin of Modern Homo Sapiens

    1739 Words  | 4 Pages

    There has been a great deal of heated debate for the last few decades about where modern Homo sapiens originated. From the battle grounds, two main theories emerged. One theory, labeled “Out-of-Africa” or “population replacement” explains that all modern Homo sapiens evolved from a common Homo erectus ancestor in Africa 100,000 years ago. The species began to spread and replace all other archaic human-like populations around 35,000 to 89,000 years ago. The rivaling opinion, entitled the “regional continuity” theory or “multiregional evolution” model refutes this theory and states modern humans evolved from various species of Homo erectus who interbred with others that lived in places such as Asia, Africa, and Europe. These scientists believe this theory would explain why there are differences among races around the world.

    Read More

  • Race: biological or cultural

    1148 Words  | 3 Pages

    In later years, many European scientists defined race by separating Homo Sapiens into three to six different groups. * Australoid: those from Australia, Melanesian islands * Caucasoid: Europe, North Africa, South west Asia * Mongoloid: East Asia, Siberia, the Americas * Negroid: Central and Southern Africa * Native Americans * Polynesians The scientific justification for these six groups was that members of these groups shared similar physical characteristics and originated in a particular region of the world. During the nineteenth century theories of race were advanced both by the scientific community and in the popular daily and periodical press. One idea that was taken into belief was racial standing based on skull size and features. The human skull was us...

    Read More

  • The Runaway Brain by Christopher Willis

    1001 Words  | 3 Pages

    Christopher Wills has written a fascinating chronicle of human evolution in a style that will keep the reader glued to the book to find out what happened next. The Runaway Brain is organized into four sections. First Wills addresses The Dilemmas, the many problems that students of evolution encounter mainly from public perception of the subject and from the many prejudices of those involved with the work. The question of where our species first appeared is a particularly contentious one, although it is now widely accepted that the species originated out of Africa. There are, regardless, those who still disagree and especially at first, many dismissed an African origin out of hand. Wills' second main issue is that of the transition to actual "humanity" and if it occurred once or twice. As he discusses in the chapter entitled "An Obsession with Race", those who deride those of African descent often use the multiple origin theory as one that justifies racism. Wills decries this abuse of the science and firmly argues against those that would use evolution to further racist propaganda. He also takes issue with those who insist on believing that all of humanity came from one Eve and one Adam, instead putting forth the theory of the "mitochondrial Eve"; that we all descend from the mitochondrial DNA, but that we do not in fact descent from two individuals.

    Read More

  • Sexual Dimorphism and Human Evolution

    2397 Words  | 5 Pages

    Bindon, Jim 2004 Fossil Hominids. ANT 270 Notes. http://www.as.ua.edu/ant/bindon/ant270/lectures/ hominids1.pdf Delson, Eric 1981

    Read More

  • Interbreeding Between Neandertals and Modern Humans

    1344 Words  | 3 Pages

    The human archaeological record is a long and undefined story that may be the most complex question researched today. One of the big questions in human history is the disappearance of the Neanderthal people from the archaeological record around 30,000 BP. While for thousands of years Neanderthals and Anatomically modern humans crossed paths and perhaps lived in close relations, we have yet to really understand the degree to which they lived together. My hypothesis is that these two hominids, Neanderthals and Anatomically Modern Humans, interbred exchanging genes after Modern Humans dispersed from Africa and creating like cultures and material remains. The differences between Neanderthal and Modern humans are not only physical but also genetically evolved and this research will determine an estimated amount of admixture between the two groups.

    Read More

  • Evolution of the Human Diet

    3413 Words  | 7 Pages

    Teaford, Mark F. "Diet and the Evolution of the Earliest Human Ancestors." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 5 Oct. 2000. Web. 19 Nov. 2015. .

    Read More

  • The History of Hominid Evolution

    1037 Words  | 3 Pages

    Their faces also consist of big arching browridges just above their eyes (Stanford 302). Throughout the human evolution fossils have been found and each bone discovered demonstrates how the early hominids to the modern human features have changed. Each bone showed off different stories and new facts. Even the inner ear bone has changed in shape and in size throughout the early hominids. Over time the littlest things have changed but it seems like it helped surviving better, by helping to be able to be biped and tool making.

    Read More

More about Early Homo Sapiens: Uniregional versus Multiregional Theory

Open Document