More handpicked essays just for you.
Similarities between japan and usa educational systems
Similarities between japan and usa educational systems
Japanese vs American Education System
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”, said former South African President, Nelson Mandela. Education brings higher paid jobs, more opportunities, and a healthier community. Currently the education system in the United States is flawed as evidenced by our high school mathematics ranking of 35th in the world, 25th in reading and 27th in science*. America’s rankings fall far behind that of the majority of Asian countries. The last time Congress reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, America received the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001. The focus of NCLB was standard based education reform based on the premise that setting high standards and establishing measurable goals can improve individual outcomes in education.
Senator Thomas Harkin of Indiana introduced Strengthening America’s Schools Act of 2013 on June 4, 2013. It is an act which covers the concerns of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, but S.1094 does not address many of the shortcomings of the American education system and is not that mu...
Even with the negative and positive functions of No Child Left Behind, there are many areas that still need to ironed out. Under the Obama administration several states have received a waiver from No Child Left Behind, “with this waiver students will still be tested annually. But starting this fall, schools in those states will no longer face the same prescriptive actions spelled out under No Child Left Behind” (Feller & Hefling, 2012). Since 2007, the law has been up for review, but due to opponents of the law there has not been an agreement reached and the law continues to stress our schools and children out. We can only hope that when this law is reviewed and agreed upon that it really is in the best interest of our children and the nation as a whole.
The implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act applied a market approach to school reform as a way of improving the school system. This new law promised an era of high standards, testing, and accountability in
Neill, Monty. "The No Child Left Behind Act Is Not Improving Education." Education: Opposing Viewpoints. New York: Greenhaven, 2005. 162-68. Print.
A Blueprint for Reform is the title of President Barack Obama’s and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan’s proposal to Congress to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. This Act will essentially replace the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB) and any subsequent documents used in place of NCLB. In 2009, Congress enacted the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) in response to the “great recession” of 2008. One of the many objectives of this act was to invest in and reform education focusing on four areas: (1) Improving teachers and principals in every school: (2) Providing information to families and educators to increase student learning (3) Implementing college and career-ready standards; (4) Addressing Americas lowest-performing schools. The blueprint sets out five key priorities to address the four areas set out in the ARRA: (1) College- and Career-Ready Students;(2) Great Teachers and Leaders in Every School;(3) Equity and Opportunity for All Students;(4) Raise the Bar and Reward Excellence;(5) Promote Innovation and Continuous Improvement.
"Every young man is born with some determination in his nature, and is a potential genius." At first glance this quote produces a mix of emotions from the reader. Upon further investigation and examining the word choice one may find Emerson's statement to be completely valid. Ralph Waldo Emerson's essay titled "Education," uses the open words "some" and "potential," making the statement more realistic and ultimately true.
Most controversies over education are centered around the question of how strictly standards should be upheld. The concern over whether or not flunking students is appropriate or even in the best interest of the student is a widely discussed topic. The argument often begins with students just starting school where the question of standardized testing for kindergartners arises. The majority of people are actually against such testing because they feel that a child who is labeled as a failure at such an early age may be permanently damaged (Bowen 86). The worry over the failure issue is further traced to educators who feel children just entering school are not fully prepared. Teachers are faced with kindergarten students who do not know their addresses, colors, and sometimes even first and last names (An ‘F’ 59).
NCLB was passed with a goal of closing the achievement gap between white students and their low-income and minority peers. However research over the past 10 years has found that the high-stakes testing policies have not improved reading and math achievement across states, and have not significantly narrowed national and state level achievement gaps (Au, 2009). In fact, the high stakes testing and standardization of classrooms has hurt the very students it set out to help. According to Haretos...
Over the last twenty years, America’s Public Educational system has changed their teaching policy directions to focus more on standards-based instruction. Laturnau (2001) states, “Standards-based instruction (SBI) is at the forefront of education reform because it presents a way to ensure that all students are exposed to challenging curricula and prepared to contribute positively to an increasingly complex world.” During the Clinton administration in the year 1994, there was a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) which begun this strong move towards SBI. The SBI idea was then continued on under the Bush administration through the passing of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001. Shepard, Hannaway, & Baker (2009) write “In a recent survey of policy makers, standards were acknowledged as the central framework guiding state education policy.” The standards-based instruction idea is one that requires states to exclude no particular student and also includes guidelines for evaluating the educators that the American people trust to teach our future generations to be sure that no child is left behind and every student academically succeeds.
...c education in 1965, when President Johnson passed the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) in an attempt to provide a better quality of education that was equal for all children, and a modern educational reform movement was ignited. In 2002, standardized testing increased even more when it became the most critical tool used to evaluate students, teachers, schools, and entire districts after the passing of the “No Child Left Behind” Act (NCLB). The NCLB was a direct attempt to improve how students from the United States ranked educationally as compared with other nations, and it led to a phenomenal increase in testing requirements and student assessments. Ironically, between 2000 and 2009, American students’ fell from 18th to 31st in worldwide standings in Math, with a similar decline in Science scores.
High school is a subpar educational center in which test scores take precedence over learning. Diane Ravitch, the former Assistant Secretary of Education and research professor of education, openly voices her opinion on a specific reform program in her book, The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choices are Undermining Education. According to Ravitch, the NCLB program demands that all students - including those with special needs and those whose native language is not English - must be proficient in mathematics and reading in order for the schools and teachers to avoid consequences (Source 5). While this may encourage teachers to improve their
Education has been a hot topic in every political campaign, top news headline, and teacher’s first thought when they head to their classroom to teach America’s future. The education system is the most vulnerable aspect of a nation. It is the building block for creating successful individuals who dare to dream of changing the world and have the power of doing things people only dream of. A country is only as strong as the weakest link and for America it’s the uneducated. For as long as anyone can remember there has been one thing that the majority of the news headlines, workers strikes, and state questions have revolved around, education reform. Three highly educated authors provide three common overlapping issues that harshly impact the education system in the United States. In the article “Why the United States is destroying
The reasons we educate our children have changed over time. However, some of the core values remain the same. One of the most important purposes of schooling is the transmission of a culture from one generation to the next. It is important to pass on our culture, values, and beliefs to our children so we continue to have a cohesive population. Schooling offers opportunity to our children by teaching them valuable skills that allow them to be self-sufficient and lead successful lives. Schooling also serves to decrease the social ills those without an education suffer from. A final purpose of education is to create people who are active in civic life.
The inequality of education is a disparity among our children experience in their education compared to other children. The relations of educational success focus on grades, test scores, dropout rates, college entrance rates, and college completion percentages. Unfortunately, the inequalities of education are linked to the difference in socioeconomic status, racial, and geographic reasons. According, to Colclough (2005) “it is commonly presumed that formal schooling is one of several important contributors to the skills of an individual and to human capital. There’s not just only one factor parents, individuals and government officials have the abilities to contribute” (p.40). This perception of inequality of education does not only exist in the United States, but also all over the world. When associated with other nations the United States invests the most in education, however manages to obtain lower levels of student performance than many other countries. The children around the nation are not responsible for the injustice of inequality in education but sadly enough they are our victims. Although, the ones to blame would be our government they should be accountable for creating a vicious cycle that eventually trickles down to our public education. Our government highly contributes to our problem on the inequality of education because they are the ones in control of the Board of Education were they have the opportunity to analyze their trouble schools including their state test scores, their academic school standings, and school dropout rates. By knowing and having easy access to valuable information there shouldn’t be any an excuse on the behalf of the government or on the Board of Education for not trying to working together i...
education is life itself." This philosophy truly emphasizes the importance of education in one's life, and that they are indeed interrelated, not separated. I believe he was expressing, in part, the notion that education should serve us throughout our lives, constantly empowering us to achieve our greatest potential through self-realization. Learning, is a life-long process, by which we are all constantly searching for meaning through reflecting on our experiences to make sense of, and better understand the world in which we live in. I am humble enough to say that I too remain a student, not just in the literal sense, but in life. As teachers, I believe it is our responsibility to provide an educational experience that motivates our students to discover their own hidden potentials and to hopefully achieve self-realization. This is especially important for young children, for it is with the combination of their innate learning ability and the influence of great educators that can account for their marvelous capacity of potential.
“Charity sees the need, not the cause.” (German Proverb) Many people may question “What is charity?” According to Webster’s dictionary, Charity is defined as the benevolent goodwill toward or love of humanity. Charity to me is significant because it gives you a feeling of inner satisfaction while helping out your community as well. If you have the capability, then you should be able to share it with those less fortunate. The community we live in has a huge influence on us personally – it fosters safety, responsibility and sustainability – so it is important that we take our community seriously for the greater good of humanity and for our own personal benefit.