Dysfunctional Families In Hitchcock's Films

608 Words2 Pages

Though “conservatism” and “conformity” were the catchphrases of the period there were nonconformity too. Dysfunctional families were there. Youth who were not satisfactory revolted against norms. { Hitchcock never explicitly referred to or mentioned developments of the period or the ongoing political machinations that made daily news; and while he hardly stove to substantiate David Lehman’s claim for the overriding theme in Hitchcock’s America, that “paranoia is sometimes a reasonable response to events in a world of menace” (qtd in Pomerance 12). As pointed out by Marshall Deutelbaum Hitchcock’s films were diligently faithful in their representation of the look and style of American everyday reality and it repeatedly focused on the …show more content…

The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956), a Hollywood version of the 1934 British classic presents an average American family Dr. Ben Mckenna (James Stewart) and Jo Conway Mckenna (Doris Day) an internationally reputed singer who abandoned her career in favour of her husband whose medical practice is in Indiana Polis. The family structure of Mckennas is complete with Hank’s kidnapping. For Jo and Ben a new meaning dawns their life with the completion of the linear journey from America to Europe to London. The journey also indicates their double fall and finally when Jo sings “We’ll Love Again” when Ben and Hank descents the staircase which ends the whole kidnapping situation on a happy note (Spoto 253). In the film Hitchcock represents a strong family-a husband, wife and a child who never loses hope and mental strength in the midst of adversities. With the richness in character, plot, theme and feeling The Man Who Knew Too Much remains of the greatest American films. The second version of the film was far more elaborate production using exotic locales, lavish sets, colour cinematography and big name stars. The first version of the film was a low budget one with few technical resources at the director’s disposal. But few consider the second version despite the Hollywood polish plodding and stodgy lacking the witty spontaneity of the

Open Document