FEMA: Levels of Planning
In the wake of hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has been under fire. Why did so much go wrong? Why were we were so unprepared?
Extreme disaster emergencies, such as the Hurricane Katrina, may burden state’s emergency operation plans when the extent of the situation strains the response plan to its maximum limit (1). When all resources are depleted, states may request a presidential disaster declaration to receive more support; yet they would be unlikely to manage such tremendous response by themselves. Partnership with private-sector such as businesses and institutions may be pivotal to fill important gaps in emergency response. Therefore, an effective emergency response should include a multidisciplinary approach and inter-organizational management from public-private partnership, like business-government partnership (2).
Both man-made and natural disasters are often devastating, resource draining and disruptive. Having a basic plan ready for these types of disaster events is key to the success of executing and implementing, as well as assessing the aftermath. There are many different ways to create an emergency operations plan (EOP) to encompass a natural and/or man-made disaster, including following the six stage planning process, collection of information, and identification of threats and hazards. The most important aspect of the US emergency management system in preparing for, mitigating, and responding to man-made and natural disasters is the creation, implementation and assessment of a community’s EOP.
The model outlines the chain of command between multi-level government agencies, and the private sector (mostly non-government disaster organizations), which enhances harmony regarding response strategies. Therefore, ICS recognizes the possibility of a clash of interests and procedures if different government agencies, as well as different levels of government carry out disaster response in the United States. It then follows that both the ICS and NIMS provide a national strategy framework for the response to disasters in the United States by harmonizing the procedures, and outlining the responsibilities and limits of all the parties or stakeholders involved (Buck et al., 2006). The Department of Homeland Security developed the models as a tool of enhancing the efficiency of disaster response, especially going by the diverse nature of the multi-level organizations involved (Sylves, 2007). The two models have been adopted by different organizations, which is an indication of their role in enhancing effective disaster
McEntire, , D. A. (Ed.). (n.d.). Comparative Emergency Management: Understanding Disaster Policies, Organizations, and Initiatives from Around the World. Retrieved from http://www.training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/edu/collegelist/OtherCountries/
In order to aid the population in the effort of loss reduction and facing the challenges caused by disaster there are many viable options. In order to reduce vulnerability we can increase access to decision making, increase community/neighborhood security, and have plans set for people who themselves along with their home’s are in the most danger.
Catastrophes impact large areas, crossing regional and often, state jurisdictional boundaries, and will require m...
Communities must come together in order to be aware of the steps that must be taken to reduce or prevent risk. “The guidance, programs, processes, and systems that support each component of the National Preparedness System enable a collaborative, whole community approach to national preparedness that engages individuals, families, communities, private and nonprofit sectors, faith based organizations and all levels of government.” (FEMA, 2011). Resources within a community are prioritized and customized based on community-based issues and local security programs. The resources used as the front line of defense are first responders, such as police officers, firefighters and medical personnel. The resources are provided and prioritized based on the priority of threat and risks to a specific community. Therefore, the threats and risks targeted towards a community must be analyzed and acknowledged in order to apply the correct resources to the opposing prioritized threats. Disasters and emergencies typically begin at the local level and eventually require resources from state and federal
Introduction
Disaster Recovery Planning is the critical factor that can prevent headaches or nightmares experienced by an organization in times of disaster. Having a disaster recovery plan marks the difference between organizations that can successfully manage crises with minimal cost, effort and with maximum speed, and those organizations that cannot. By having back-up plans, not only for equipment and network recovery, but also detailed disaster recovery plans that precisely outline what steps each person involved in recovery efforts should undertake, an organization can improve their recovery time and minimize the disrupted time for their normal business functions. Thus it is essential that disaster recovery plans are carefully laid out and carefully updated regularly. Part of the plan should include a system where regular training occurs for network engineers and managers.
Emergency management is often described in terms of “phases,” using terms such as mitigate, prepare, respond and recover. The main purpose of this assignment is to examine the origins, underlying concepts, variations, limitations, and implications of the “phases of emergency management.” In this paper we will look at definitions and descriptions of each phase or component of emergency management, the importance of understanding interrelationships and responsibilities for each phase, some newer language and associated concepts (e.g., disaster resistance, sustainability, resilience, business continuity, risk management), and the diversity of research perspectives.