Due Process Model Vs. Crime Control Model

433 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Due process vs crime control model of criminal justice

There are 2 different value systems in criminal justice according to Herbert Packer. One is the crime control model and the other is the due process model. In the crime control model, they want the system to move faster and more efficiently. “Packer characterizes the crime control model as “assembly-line justice” (Bohm & Haley, 2014, p. 16). This means that the system runs at a faster pace and using plea bargaining to achieve their goals. In this model, they use the presumption of guilty instead of innocent until proven guilty. The due process model is based more on presuming that someone is innocent until proven guilty instead of just the assumption of guilt. In due process, they would rather a guilty man go free instead of an innocent man doing time because he was …show more content…

Granted due process is not as fast as crime control, it is a better way of dealing with the people. Everyone should be able to have a fair trial, they should be considered innocent until proven guilty. If we did not have due process then everyone one would get the same sentence for the same crime. If Sally has a record for assault and got into a fight again, she should get a harsher sentence then Jane that has no record and has never been in a fight till now. In crime control, both ladies would be sentenced the same or having to make a plea deal. In due process, each person is looked at as an individual. Or also, say that an officer got all the information that he needed to arrest someone, but he ended up arresting the wrong man, in due process, they would need proof of legal guilt and factual guilt to be convicted. Sometimes it is better to let a guilty man walk then to send an innocent man to jail. If a guilty man walks, he may change his life. Or he may commit another crime, in committing another crime, that is another chance to arrest him. Now if an innocent man goes to jail, that is a life that has been ruined for no

Show More
Related

  • R V. Rogerson And Mcnamara Case Analysis

    611 Words  | 2 Pages

    Plea bargaining precludes justice from being achieved, where the consent to less severe sentences are given in favour of time and money. The case of R v Rogerson and McNamara, demonstrates the advantages of hiring highly trained legal personnel, which inevitably contributed to their lesser sentence. Thus, making it more difficult for offenders to be convicted.

    Read More

  • Crime Control versus Due Process in Canada

    1075 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the benefits of due process is demonstrated in the Belshaw case. The inquisitorial system of justice is based on crime control; the Swiss police had a hard time in Canada with Mr. Belshaw, because of his right to due process, under Canadian law. Both systems of justice share common beliefs, for example, they both look for proof beyond a reasonable doubt. In Canada we fight about facts and laws, where-as the inquisitorial system searches for the facts. The adversarial system has a separation of powers with the police, crown, defense, and the judge. It is quite different for the inquisitorial system of justice, the police do the arrest, then they present the facts to crown, which then decide if they have a case and turn over the evidence to the judge. The only problem is that the judge decides what will lead them to the truth. How any evidence was collected is irrelevant. In due process if the police obtain evidence and violate the law or a persons charter of rights and freedoms the judge will exclude the evidence from the hearing, even if it would help or prove that the person is guilty. These two systems of justice are generated in democratic traditions.

    Read More

  • Herbert Parker's Aggressive Policing And Criminal Justice Practices

    663 Words  | 2 Pages

    Herbert Parker introduced two models. One called the crime control model and the other called the due process model. Many argue about how these models affect the society and courts. They argue how one is giving more civilian rights than the other. The criminal justice system goals are to

    Read More

  • Due Process vs. Crime Control Model

    465 Words  | 1 Pages

    The two models of crime that have been opposing each other for years are the due process model and the crime control model. The due process model is the principle that an individual cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without appropriate legal procedures and safeguards. ( Answers.Com) Any person that is charged with a crime is required to have their rights protected by the criminal justice system under the due process model. The crime control model for law enforcement is based on the assumption of absolute reliability of police fact-finding, treats arrestees as if they are already found guilty. (Crime control model) This paper will compare and contrast the role that the due process and crime control models have on shaping criminal procedure policy.

    Read More

  • Criminal Justice

    751 Words  | 2 Pages

    The governance of our present day public and social order co-exist within the present day individual. Attempts to recognize the essentiality of equality in hopes of achieving an imaginable notion of structure and order, has led evidence based practitioners such as Herbert Packer to approach crime and the criminal justice system through due process and crime control. A system where packer believed in which ones rights are not to be infringed defrauded or abused was to be considered to be the ideal for procedural fairness. “I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.” Thomas Jefferson pg 9 cjt To convict an individual because proper consideration was not taken will stir up social unrest rather then it’s initial intent, when he or she who has committed the crime is not punished for their doings can cause for a repetition and even collaboration with other’s for a similar or greater crime.

    Read More

  • racial profiling

    1016 Words  | 3 Pages

    In conclusion, if racial profiling is not stopped there will be no such thing as a fair trial. The only way to stop racial profiling is take this poison out of our bodies. If the media would portray a trial in a not bias way many people would not racially profile. Fair trials do not exist due to the fact of racial profiling, media bias, and the biasness of the jury. Racial profiling will further more cause innocent people to be jailed or criminals get away with the crime.

    Read More

  • Procedural Vs. Procedural And Substantive Due Process

    3020 Words  | 7 Pages

    The state should always observe them in ensuring that an individual faces a fair and impartial trial which they have been accused of. The procedural due process is concerned with verifying that the law was applicable and convincing. Also involves the arrest and examination of the charges brought forward.

    Read More

  • Should Plea Bargaining be Abolished?

    2271 Words  | 5 Pages

    One could wonder why plea bargains are even made. One reason would be that criminal courts are becoming clogged and overcrowded. Going through the proper procedure and processes that we are granted takes time. Trials can take anywhere from days to...

    Read More

  • Racial Disparity In The Criminal Justice System Essay

    952 Words  | 2 Pages

    phase of the criminal justice system, and to do so in a harmonized manner. Without a systematic

    Read More

  • Individual Rights Versus Public Order

    1646 Words  | 4 Pages

    The basis of criminal justice in the United States is one founded on both the rights of the individual and the democratic order of the people. Evinced through the myriad forms whereby liberty and equity marry into the mores of society to form the ethos of a people. However, these two systems of justice are rife with conflicts too. With the challenges of determining prevailing worth in public order and individual rights coming down to the best service of justice for society. Bearing a perpetual eye to their manifestations by the truth of how "the trade-off between freedom and security, so often proposed so seductively, very often leads to the loss of both" (Hitchens, 2003, para. 5).

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Plea Bargains

    933 Words  | 2 Pages

    For decades, we have been made to believe that criminals are people who have done harm to our society, violating the laws of the land, and don 't deserve a second chance. They should be locked away, and the keys should throw away. Unfortunately, today, our world is full of crimes and our system is getting overcrowded with criminals. However, with recent laws like the plea bargain proofs that there is hope and a way out to every situation. A plea bargain can be defined as negotiations during a criminal trial between the prosecutor and the defendant which result in a more lenient sentence than would have been recommended with the original charge (Farlex). Some would say that the use, or abuse, of the plea bargain, allows criminals

    Read More

  • The Criminal Trial Process

    1108 Words  | 3 Pages

    The criminal trial process is able to reflect the moral and ethical standards of society to a great extent. For the law to be effective, the criminal trial process must reflect what is accepted by society to be a breach of moral and ethical conduct and the extent to which protections are granted to the victims, the offenders and the community. For these reasons, the criminal trial process is effectively able to achieve this in the areas of the adversary system, the system of appeals, legal aid and the jury system.

    Read More

  • paper

    986 Words  | 2 Pages

    The criminal justice system is made up of three main parts: law enforcement, the court system, and corrections. These three components are interconnected. You can’t have one without the other. The term “consensus model” describes this relationship. The consensus model supports the idea that all three groups should work together to achieve justice.

    Read More

  • The Criminal Justice System

    1478 Words  | 3 Pages

    The criminal justice system is composed of three parts – Police, Courts and Corrections – and all three work together to protect an individual’s rights and the rights of society to live without fear of being a victim of crime. According to merriam-webster.com, crime is defined as “an act that is forbidden or omission of a duty that is commanded by public law and that makes the offender liable to punishment by that law.” When all the three parts work together, it makes the criminal justice system function like a well tuned machine.

    Read More

  • Pros and Cons of Death Penalty

    623 Words  | 2 Pages

    Great effort has been made in our criminal justice system in pretrial, trial, appeals, writ and clemency procedures to minimize the chance of and innocent person being convicted and sentenced to death. Since 1973, legal protections have been so great that 37 percent of all death row cases have been overturned for due process reasons or commuted. Inmates are six times more likely to get off death row by appeals than by execution.

    Read More

More about Due Process Model Vs. Crime Control Model

Open Document