Dredful fight for freedom

889 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Impact of the Dred Scott case

Dredful Fight For Freedom The Dred Scott Case was a dispute between Dred Scott, and his owner Sanford. Dred Scott was a slave who was brought into a free territory by his owner, from this Scott tried to sue for his freedom. The conflict led to a Supreme Court decision that said that any African-American, free or slave, could not be a citizen of the United States. Therefore, African-American’s had no right to sue in federal court. This meant that any previous attempt to end slavery was now invalid. The decision effectively ended the Missouri Compromise, creating a rivalry between the North and the South, leading the way for the Civil War. In today’s society, we have similar problems like the Dred Scott case. An example is the debate of same-sex marriage. Which is fighting for human equality. Dred Scott began his fight for freedom when he tried to sue Emerson, his owner who had brought him into a free state. Previously the Missouri courts had heard over ten other cases like Scotts and had claimed them all free. Unfortunately, Scott had failed to provide a witness to prove that he was Eliza Emerson’s slave resulting in the dismissal of his case. Scott was granted a second trial in which him and his family were claimed free. She didn’t want to lose the Scotts and appealed the case to the Supreme Court of Missouri. The case was delayed for a while and in the meantime, Emerson moved to Massachusetts’s leaving Scott in the possession of her brother, Sanford. In 1852, the case finally began and Scott was once again turned down. For a third time in 1853, Scott sued, but this time in a federal court. The jury sided with Sanford, and Scott was once again claimed still a slave. In a desperate and final act for freedom Scott appe... ... middle of paper ... ...and women. That is neither equal nor right. This relates to the Dred Scott case by the treatment of inequality. Dred Scott was looked upon differently because he was black. In gay marriages, people of the same-sex are being treated unequally because they are the same gender. Being black or liking someone of the same-sex is not a choice. It is something you are born as that you can’t change. Why should people be punished fort something they didn’t choose but were made as? The Dred Scott case played an important role for slavery. It helped bring people to the understanding that the plan was not actually to get rid of slavery, but to spread it. The Dred Scott case helped ignite the Civil War. It plays an important role in our history that changed the viewing on African-American people. It may forever be known as the worst decision made by the Supreme Court.

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of The Day Freedom Died By Charles Lane

    1517 Words  | 4 Pages

    Journalist Charles Lane learned about the Colfax Massacre case while he was on The Washington Post case. In his book “The Day Freedom Died: The Colfax Massacre, The Supreme Court, and The Betrayal of Reconstruction”, Lane spotlights the Colfax Massacre of 1873 and the result of that event. Lane gives an insightful and detailed analysis of the conditions in Louisiana during this time of reconstruction, both politically and socially. He describes the death of over 60 blacks as a result of the horrific attack that took place at the Colfax court house. Lane recounts the Federal and the Supreme Court trials and the aftermath of the criminals’ not guilty verdict.

    Read More

  • The Dred Scott Decision

    2548 Words  | 6 Pages

    questions arise: 1st.[sic] Was [Scott], together with his family, free in Missouri by reason of his stay in the territory of the United States hereinbefore mentioned? And 2d[sic], If they were not, is Scott himself free by reason of his removal to Rock Island, in the state of Illinois...?" Both of these questions led to an even greater and more central question: "Can a negro, whose ancestors were imported into this country, and sold as slaves, become a member of the political community formed and brought into existence by the Constitution of the United States, and as such become entitled to all the rights, and priveledges, and immunities, guarantied by that instrument to the citizen?" (i.e. does Scott, having been a slave, have the constitutional right to sue?)

    Read More

  • The Relationship Between Abraham Lincoln And James Oakes

    862 Words  | 2 Pages

    At the same time in history, the Dred Scott case was taking place. This case was to determine what should be deemed appropriate for the rights of slaves. This case in particular infuriated Lincoln more than anything else did in his career. The ruling in this case was a legal way to insure that anyone that was enslaved was not only unable to become freed, but also that they were unable to be acknowledges as citizens in the United States at

    Read More

  • Jackson V. Birmingham Board Of Education Case Study

    933 Words  | 2 Pages

    Jackson vs. Birmingham Board of Education (2005) is a more recent case that still fights against one of history?s most common topics; equal rights. This will always stand as one of the greatest problem factors the world will face until eternity. These issues date back for years and years. This case was brought to the Supreme Court in 2004 for a well-known topic of sexual discrimination. It helped to define the importance of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972

    Read More

  • Mendez V Westminster Case Study

    1093 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the late 1940’s and early 1950’s there were many issues that involved racial segregation with many different communities. A lot of people did not took a stand for these issues until they were addressed by other racial groups. Mendez vs Westminster and Brown vs The Board of Education, were related cases that had to take a stand to make a change. These two cases helped many people with different races to come together and be able to go to school even if a person was different than the rest.

    Read More

  • Dred Scott Case Analysis

    1559 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Dread Scott decision exacerbated the debate over slavery by declaring that blacks cannot be citizens and that Congress does not have the power to prohibit slavery in the territories, which further divided the North and the South. The decision also deeply affected politics, and was one of the causes of the Civil War.

    Read More

  • John Marshall Harlan’s Dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson

    1695 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout American History, many minorities have fallen victim to cruel discrimination and inequality, African Americans were one of such minorities that greatly suffered from the white majority’s upper hand. After the end of the Civil War and the Reconstruction period following it, many people, especially the Southern population, were extremely against African Americans obtaining equal rights in the American society. Due to this, these opponents did everything in their power to limit and even fully strip African Americans of their rights. The Supreme Court case of Plessy v Ferguson in 1896 is an excellent example of the obstacles put forth by the white population against their black counterparts in their long and arduous fight for civil liberty and equality. Even though the court upheld the discriminatory Louisiana law with an 8-1 decision, John Marshall Harlan’s dissent in the case played a significant role in the history of the United States for it predicted all the injustice African Americans would be forced to undergo for many more years, mainly due to this landmark decision.

    Read More

  • Dred Scott Decision

    1109 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Dred Scott was an enslaved African American”, (Appleby 446-447). He was born into slavery in 1799. His parents were slaves of Peter Blow, who lived in Virginia. Since his parents were slaves, Dred was a slave since the time of his birth. In 1830, the Blow family moved to St. Louis, Missouri and brought Dred with them. A couple years later he was sold to Dr. John Emerson, an army doctor who at the time was stationed in St. Louis. Dr John Emerson, along with Dred, was transferred in 1834 to Rock Island, Illinois (a Free State) and then in 1836 to the military outpost in the Upper Louisiana Territory. John was stationed at each military base for a couple of years. While in the Upper Louisiana Territory, Dred met Harriet Robison who was owned by Major Taliaferro. John bought Harri...

    Read More

  • Brown v. Board of Education

    1307 Words  | 3 Pages

    The case of brown v. board of education was one of the biggest turning points for African Americans to becoming accepted into white society at the time. Brown vs. Board of education to this day remains one of, if not the most important cases that African Americans have brought to the surface for the better of the United States. Brown v. Board of Education was not simply about children and education (Silent Covenants pg 11); it was about being equal in a society that claims African Americans were treated equal, when in fact they were definitely not. This case was the starting point for many Americans to realize that separate but equal did not work. The separate but equal label did not make sense either, the circumstances were clearly not separate but equal. Brown v. Board of Education brought this out, this case was the reason that blacks and whites no longer have separate restrooms and water fountains, this was the case that truly destroyed the saying separate but equal, Brown vs. Board of education truly made everyone equal.

    Read More

  • Missouri Compromise Essay

    758 Words  | 2 Pages

    Lastly, Dred Scott Case with the United States Supreme court fought freedom for the slaves in the American Legal System. In 1857, the court 's decision denied his plea and determined that no Negro,a term used to portray anybody that was African blood, was or could ever be a citizen. This decision also the reason for the Missouri Compromise, which set restrictions on slavery in certain U.S territories. The Northerners were outraged and the Dred Scott case became a reason to elect president Abraham Lincoln in 1860

    Read More

  • The American Revolution: Freedom for the White Man

    1028 Words  | 3 Pages

    men. Slaves also feared the whip and even death if they were to act out

    Read More

  • Events Leading To The Civil War

    866 Words  | 2 Pages

    Dred Scott was a slave. His master was an army surgeon who was based in Missouri. In the early 1830's and 1840's his master and him traveled to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory. It was in 1846 that Scott sued his master's widow for freedom. His argument was that the state of ...

    Read More

  • Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Study

    951 Words  | 2 Pages

    Was Dred Scott a free man or a slave? The Dred Scott v. Sandford case is about a slave named Dred Scott from Missouri who sued for his freedom. His owner, John Emerson, had taken Scott along with him to Illinois which was one of the states that prohibited slavery. Scott’s owner later passed away after returning back to Missouri. After suits and counter suits the case eventually made it to the Supreme Court with a 7-2 decision. Chief Justice Taney spoke for the majority, when saying that Dred Scott could not sue because he was not a citizen, also that congress did not have the constitutional power to abolish slavery, and that the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional. The case is very important, because it had a lot

    Read More

  • The Impact of the Dred Scott Case on the United States

    1457 Words  | 3 Pages

    The reason why Dred Scott decided to pursue his freedom is unknown, but there are a couple theories. For example, it is believed that “most likely, Scott decided to bring his case to court after years of [talks] with other slaves that had done the same.” (Herda, 30) This shows that, Scott was not an ignorant, uninformed man and had reason to believe he could obtain freedom for himself and his family. This also shows that he took a long look at the issue before making the decision to sue for his freedom. In addition, he may have also been convinced by “several talks with his old friends, the Blows, who were sympathetic to his troubles.” (Herda, 30) This shows that his previous owners, turned friends, the Blows, may have been a major influence; being Scott’s staunch supporters throughout his life. This also shows that the Blows encouragement, on top of other slave’s actions, may have been what finally convinced Scott to pursue the suit for his freedom. In conclusion, several factors convinced Scott to sue for his freedom including the opinion of his previous owners, the Blows. 188

    Read More

  • The Supreme Court Case that Fueled the Beginning of the Civil War

    719 Words  | 2 Pages

    Dred Scott was born as a slave in Virginia. As a young man he was taken to Missouri, where he was later sold to Dr. John Emerson. A military surgeon, Dr. John Emerson moved Scott a US Army Post in the free state of Illinois. Several years later Dr. Emerson moved once again, but this time to the Wisconsin Territory. As part of the massive Louisiana Purchase the Wisconsin Territory under the Missouri Compromise prohibited slavery. While in the Wisconsin Territory and also later in St. Louis the Emersons started to rent the Scotts out as servants. Under several state and federal laws this was an illegal act in direct violation of the Missouri Compromise, the Northwest Ordinance, and the Wisconsin Enabling Act. Scott bounced around from several military posts including one in Louisiana before ending up again in St. Louis, Missouri. After the death of Dr. Emerson, ownership of the Scotts reverted to his wife. Through out 1846 Scott tried several times to by the freedom for him and his family. After several failed attempts he resorted to the legal r...

    Read More

More about Dredful fight for freedom

Open Document