Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion of an inspector call by Priestley
Conclusion of an inspector call by Priestley
Conclusion of an inspector call by Priestley
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion of an inspector call by Priestley
Dramatic Devices in An Inspector Calls by J.B. Priestley
This essay will show the way that the author, J.B Priestley, used
dramatic devices within 'An Inspector Calls' to convey his concerns
and ideas to the public. The essay also highlight and examine the
dramatic devices Priestley includes to interest and involve the
audience in his play.
The character of the inspector wanted to make it clear to the Birlings
that there was another harsh world outside their rich, comfortable and
secure way of living. The inspector tried to entice the Birlings into
realising that some people do not have the same opportunities as they
had known and needed a helping hand. The Inspector did his best to
place the Birlings into the shoes of some of the more disadvantaged
people. His goal in the play was to make them see and understand life
in the 'real' world.
Priestley's main concerns were with higher classed people and their
ignorance to the pleas of the poor. He didn't like the emotions of
women like Eva Smith being played around with by wealthier people. The
impression given throughout 'An Inspector Calls,' is that Priestley
seemed to believe in close communities and equal opportunities.
'An Inspector Calls,' was set in 1912, yet was written and first
performed in 1945.
The period of 1912 was when Priestley stated he gained much of his
experience. From this epoch he took in enough to perfect his writing
skills. We also know that the year 1912 is somehow significant because
Priestly draws upon a number of dramatic devices within his play
(these devices must be for this year because that is when the play is
set). They did not believe that...
... middle of paper ...
... exist. Priestley's messages
have certainly reached me.
To be honest, first I believed the Birlings were a grateful, hard
working family. However, the Inspector soon changed my point of view.
Once I had found out everything, I believed that this was a family who
simply cared for no-one but themselves and did whatever suited their
mood. The younger members of the family had been influenced, but they
at least showed remorse when they realised their shameful involvement.
This made me look towards the examples that had been set by Mr and Mrs
Birling. They had taught their children to respect them, but had
probably never mentioned anything about their behaviour towards
everyday 'normal' people.
My opinion of the Birlings completely changed. The moral I have taken
from the play is to never judge a book by it's cover.
...s a combination show the unfathomable broadness of this cultural value as well as portraying the submissiveness of women as something that they are destined to become. This value in particular may also associate with racial and class stereotypes and operates in the same manner.
it will create. He makes a toast to the couple and to the fact that
she needed more money. So she said to him give me 25/6 because of that
The war was said to bring fire blood & anguish in to our lives. WW1 -
A Comparison of Characters of Mr. Birling and Inspector Goole in J.B. Priestley's An Inspector Calls
· The social class system at the time when the play is set, (rich and
J.B. Priestley's Play "An Inspector Calls" "Why shouldn't they try for higher wages? We try for the highest possible prices. And I don't see why she should have been sacked". Eric to Mr Birling says this.
“The Destructors” by Graham Greene and “The Most Dangerous” Game by Richard Connell reveal similarities in both conflict, and brilliant use of suspense in a ploy to keep the reader engaged. The two short stories both hold interesting titles and take place in realistic environments under unrealistic circumstances. Nonetheless both stories relay vague similarities that create a proactive willingness to further explore the stories beyond the first few seconds of reading.
I was in the Infirmary looking at what was left of Eva Smith. A nice
There are three main characters that the reader gets to see deal with grief in Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close. The first of which is the main narrator, nine year-old Oskar Schell. Oskar is in the denial stage of grief because he is keeping his father alive by going on one last grand adventure to find the story behind the key, thus keeping him alive. But of course, there is no reason for Oskar to have the key. Oskar tells Mr. Black, “There are so many ways to die, and I just need to know which one was his” (Foer, 257). Notice how his isn’t focusing on his father’s death here, he is focusing on the logic behind his father’s death. Right now, in his mind, it isn’t logical and therefore cannot be dealt with. Furthermore, it also detaches Oskar from the death because he views it more as a math problem than a traumatic event. He isn’t suggesting that he wants to know how his father died so that he knows what his last moments were like. He doesn’t want to know if he felt pain or if he was scared. He doesn’t even want to know, in this moment, why his father died; a question many of us would expect him to ask because, historically, many of us are still asking it. That’s not the emphasis he places on the question. Oskar wants to know how so he can categorize it, understand it, and move on without actually facing it.
J.B. Priestley wrote the play "An Inspector Calls" in 1945 and set it in 1912. These dates are both relevant because he wrote his play in a world emerging from the Second World War, at a time when people were getting nostalgic about pre-world war one. Priestley used his play to try and show people that the idea of a community in 1912 was gradually being washed away by the upper classes and that the world needed to change rather than return to the egotistical society that existed in pre war England.
hand Mr and Mrs Birling are not able to do that as they think of no
to predict how they will treat other women in their life. Hamlet is a good
mind and it did not exist. We are told by the narrator that he thought
Most authors tend to write their books in an enthusiastic fashion. Daniel Handler, on the other hand, has a gloomy writing form, showing the not-so-nice things that can occur to people. For example, the three Baudelaire orphans in A Series of Unfortunate Events. Siblings who just lose their parents in a fire that engulfed their house in flames and have to deal with the nuisance known as Count Olaf, a villain after their enormous inheritance. Handler wrote the thirteen books in the series under the pseudonym Lemony Snicket.