Don Marquis And Mary Ann Warren On The Morality Of Abortion

Morals of Abortion Abortion is a very complex and moral issue that sparks numerous debates in regard to the identities, rights, and worth of the lives of women. Don Marquis and Mary Ann Warren, each having their moral framework regarding abortion, avail extremely divergent views regarding the morality of abortion.The theory stipulated by Warren compares the moral prestige of a newborn from an extensive viewpoint, emphasizing women's autonomy and personality values (Warren, 1973). Marquis, on the other hand, emphasizes the perspective that abortion is the result of the fetus's intrinsic loss of well-being and intelligence, hence demonstrating that human beings have a moral duty to preserve life (Marquis, 2006). This essay closely analyzes the

Marquis's principle places emphasis on the inherent worth of men or women and underscores the morally dubious nature of ending a destiny man or woman's life. This attitude highlights the significance of future possibilities and the moral problems surrounding abortion decision-making. Warren's case against the Marquis on the morality of abortion is more robust than his for several reasons. By emphasizing identity values, Warren offers a morally valid way of distinguishing fetal life from identity and allows for a more rigorous ethical analysis of the fetus. If this standard is recognized based on characteristics that define the essence of humanity, it allows for a more specific ethical analysis of abortion (Marquis, 2006). In addition, Warren emphasizes the importance of autonomy and order in reproductive decision-making, paying particular attention to women's rights to abortion. Warren's thesis is consistent with bodily integrity and human freedom principles. Warren departs from the Marquis's knowledge of immutable moral principles through various situations and interactions that affect ideas about