preview

Domestic Animals and the Land Ethic: A Response to J. Baird Callicott

analytical Essay
3017 words
3017 words
bookmark

Domestic Animals and the Land Ethic: A Response to J. Baird Callicott Preface Both “Animal Liberation and Environmental Ethics: Bad Marriage, Quick Divorce” by Mark Sagoff and “All Animals Are Equal” by Peter Singer seem to ignore a fundamental defining characteristic of animals, namely their level of domestication. These two essays’ assumptions and exclusions inspired me to think more about domestication. Partially through the process of brainstorming and outlining my arguments, I read “Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair” by J. Baird Callicott, which at the very least dealt with domestication, but I found that his version of the land ethic dealt with wild animals better than with domesticated animals. Abstract A certain state of nature existed for much of the history of the earth where ecosystems and species competed and selected for/against each other, causing evolutionary change. At the point where humans started to domesticate other creatures (by selecting based on simplified understandings of characteristics which was different from those previously selected for), a new era began. This new era created new ethical questions because we developed an inter-species relationship previously non-existent. J. Baird Callicott’s extension of Aldo Leopold’s land ethic addresses a possible ethic toward wild and domestic animals, but doesn’t sufficiently examine why we should treat domestic animals differently than humans and wild animals. Accepting Callicott’s ethic toward wild animals, I argue that domestic animals have evolved to become members in the human ecosystem and should be treated in that way, rather than eliminated (Callicott), treated poorly (factory farms), or liberated (animals libera... ... middle of paper ... ... to be a part of the human community and should therefore be treated not like humans, but instead as animal members of this ecosystem. Paper Bibliography Callicott, J. Baird. “Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair” in Environmental Ethics edited by Robert Elliot. Oxford University Press, New York. 1995. p. 52-63. Leopold, Aldo. “The Land Ethic” in Environmental Ethics edited by David Schmidtz and Elizabeth Willott. Oxford University Press, New York. 2002. p. 27-32. Sagoff, Mark. “Animal Liberation and Environmental Ethics: Bad Marriage, Quick Divorce” in Environmental Ethics edited by David Schmidtz and Elizabeth Willott. Oxford University Press, New York. 2002. p. 38-44. Singer, Peter. “All Animals Are Equal” in Environmental Ethics edited by David Schmidtz and Elizabeth Willott. Oxford University Press, New York. 2002. p. 17-27.

In this essay, the author

  • Analyzes how mark sagoff and peter singer's "animal liberation and environmental ethics: bad marriage, quick divorce" seem to ignore a fundamental defining characteristic of animals, namely their level of domestication.
  • Explains that ecosystems and species competed and selected for/against each other, causing evolutionary change. j. baird callicott's extension of aldo leopold’s land ethic addresses a possible ethic toward wild and domestic animals, but doesn't examine why we should treat them differently.
  • Argues that domestic animals should be treated as best we can while preserving their evolutionary and ecological entitlements to a good life and potential consumption by humans.
  • Argues that a human community ethic could apply to domestic animals, since together we've evolved into an ecological predator-prey system that has just some residual nature in it.
  • Explains that pre-historically, there was a natural order of life where species and ecosystems operated on competition, adaptation, and natural selection.
  • Explains that humans started a process of domestication sometime in our evolutionary history, not only of animals, but also of plants and the landscape.
  • Analyzes how j. baird callicott extends leopold's thoughts in "the land ethic" and "animal liberation: a triangular affair".
  • Argues that callicott's interpretation of the land ethic suits the question of ethics toward wild animals, but the assumptions he makes about domestic animals simplify too much.
  • Cites callicott, j. baird and leopold, aldo. "the land ethic" in environmental ethics edited by david schmidtz and elizabeth willott.

Let Our AI Magic Supercharge Your Grades!

    Get Access