Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Writing an essay on employee, employer relationship
Essay introduction to employer/employee relations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Writing an essay on employee, employer relationship
Word Count: xxxx Employees get through their working days having to conform to certain sets of rules and routines involving their commitment which may or may not be favourable to themselves. In seeking to maximise their utility,i.e. getting the most satisfaction or the least dissatisfaction in working, they would be forced to become more creative and resourceful in coming up with ways to affirm some control over, and give meaning for, the workloads they undertake (Noon and Blyton, 2007). The strategies formed may be viewed as workplace misbehaviours,which is referred to by Ackroyd and Thompson (1999) as “anything you do at work you are not supposed to do”, a definition borrowed from Sprouse’s (1999) defition of sabotage in the American workplace. Eventhough the definition is slightly vague, taking into context that the actions are those which breaks significant orginational standards (Robbinson and Bennett,1995), and quoting (Vardi and Wiener, 1996: 153),”…any intentional action by member/s of organization/s that defies and violates (a)shared organizational norms and expectations, and/or (b) core societal values, mores and standards of proper conduct”, we will take misbehaviour as actions which are not within the organisation’s norms,core societal values and ethics of proper conduct and are taken to gain certain benefits either to the employee themselves (survival in the workplace), against the employee (resistance) or both.Thus,in this essay it will be argued that the workplace behaviours do not necessarily signify resistance at work. The different types of misbehaviours and whether they are just a consent,resistance or both will be identified alongside the main causes of workplace behaviour in this essay. The question arises on ... ... middle of paper ... ...upervision (e.g. waiters and taxi driver), “Donkeys” : highly supevised at work and works individually, e.g. assembly line workers, “Wolves” : people who work in groups within a strong supervised environment such as airport baggage handlers, and “Vultures” : they have a strong group from which they need support to fiddle and has low supervision, e.g. salesperson. This typology developed by Mars shows the different types of opportunities available across different jobs. Financial aspect is just one aspect but not the most important part, as some aims to give a satisfaction to work, a consent. However, some may present it as ‘a way of hitting out at the boss, the company, the system or the state’ (Mars,1982: 23).Thus in a way it is a form of resistance to some, however the extend in which the managers react towards them determines the intensity resistance or consent.
He expresses about his mother working at the restaurant is what made him and this article credible. He got to witness and experience his mom and her “waiting brilliance” up close and personal (Rose, 273). He also states, “I’ve since studied the working habits of blue-collar workers and have come to understand how much my mother’s kind of work demands of both the body and the brain” (274). In this statement he establishes his own credibility as a source of authority on this issue. Rose, the author, wants to open social minds by showing “mental activity” (279) required in blue-collar work is still under-recognized and undervalued by society. The blue-collar workers are not as valued as they deserve but the capability they have is not less than other high-level workers, even sometimes it’s more than
In the early 1980s aggression and violence in the workplace have been a source of a lot of public discussion. (Piquero pg.383) The issues have risen again recently and have mostly been present in management and business fields. Workplace aggression often includes “behavior by an individual or individuals within or outside organizations that is intended to physically or psychologically harms a worker or workers and occurs in a work related”. (Schat& Kelloway Pg. 191) A national survey Conducted by the National Centers for Victims of Crime shows several statistics regarding workplace homicide by type show that is the year of (see fig. 1), violent crimes against victims working or an duty( see fig. 2) and nonfatal workplace violence committed by strangers(see fig. 3
It assumes that the worker is motivated by the money, in contradiction to Maslows hierarchy of needs which states that, there are eight innate needs , Transcendence, Self actualisation, Aesthetics, Know and, understand, Esteem, Affiliation, Safety, Biological.
The general essence of the article is that the old ways of work and the work ethic of the older generations have broken apart. In place of stable routine and predictable career paths, employees are now expected to be fluid in their jobs, and open to change on very short notice. Workers of today's generation can no longer expect long term work, or the trust and loyalty that were given to the employees of the older generation. In some ways, the writer argues that this change between the generations is positive, as they can make for a more dynamic economy. However, they are also the cause of the article's title, "The Corrosion of Character". The work ethics of the employees are no longer valued. They are taken as face value, and there is no trust and loyalty. These changes are destructive to the worker's sense of sustained purpose, integrity of self and the trust they hold in others within the workplace.
With the concept of organization justice, Shkoler (2017), defines the concept of organizational justice as the “Perceptions of the degree to which an organization provides its employees with appropriate, fair and respectful treatment, adequate and accurate information, and resources and rewards.” (Shkoler & Tziner, 2017). With this, the researchers (2017) found that employees who perceived injustice in the workplace and acted to resolve the issues developed some behaviors that demonstrated negative feelings towards the organization. These behaviors included a lack of motivation and manifestations of mistrust towards the workplace or the manager. (Shkoler et al., 2017). The consequence of perceived injustice to employers is job burnout. Emotional intelligence was measured using the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form. Organizational justice was measured by the justice scale and burnout was measured with the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Work Misbehavior was measured by the Interpersonal and Organizational Deviance Scale. Meetings were conducted among threatened participants to gather the information about what might be going on in terms of employee’s personal, social, and mental health. This included issues of expertise, self-esteem,
Workplace deviance is a voluntary unethical behavior that disobeys organizational norms about wrong and right, and in doing so, threatens the wellbeing of the organization, and/or its members(Robinson and Bennett 555-572). According to Robinson and Bennett, “workplace deviances behavior varies along two dimensions: minor versus serious, and interpersonal (deviant behavior directed at other individuals in the organization) versus organizational (deviant behavior directed at the organization)” (555-572). Based on these dimensions it was further divided, into four categories: production deviance (leaving early, wasting resources etc.), property deviance (stealing ,destroying equipment etc.), political deviance (gossiping, favoritism etc.), and personal aggression (verbal abuse ,sexual harassment etc.) (Robinson and Bennett 555-572).According to Robinson and Bennett,workplace deviant behaviors cost U.S. companies approximately between $6 billion and $200 billion annually(555-572). In addition turnover, absences, and illness, and results in poor or lowered productivity, low morale, and litigation ., workplace deviances leads to misuse and loss of time, waste of resources, increases employee(Robinson and Bennett 555-572) .
If part or all of the one’s salary is contingent on how well you actually perform your job, one will go the extra mile. The individual will attack his/her work with vigor and revel in the rewards. And...
Staff behaviors control the performance and capabilities of an organization. Most workers display productive or counterproductive productive behaviors that have effect on workers, clients, and programs. The ability to control these behaviors is a necessary part of delivering exceptional services. Many workers automatically adopt behaviors that fit in with the best interest of the organization. Although these behaviors are common, some employees fail to follow order and create havoc for others around them. Productive behavior allows workers to perform daily functions whereas counterproductive behaviors develop issues that are costly. Good behavior contributes to goals and objectives set by the organization (Britt & Jex, 2008).
The legal definition of the word steal is the wrongful or willful taking of money or property belonging to someone else with the intent to deprive the owner of its use or benefit either temporarily or permanently. Simple stated, to steal something means to take someone’s property without permission. Theft is the act of stealing and is defined by Ivancevich, Konopake and Matteson as the unauthorized taking, consuming or transfer of money or goods owned by an organization. The purpose of this paper is to explain and discuss employee theft in the workplace. The goal is to provide information concerning the motives, methods and effects of employee theft.
Example: an employee intentionally or carelessly breaks a rule at the workplace, e.g. steals company goods
Organization citizenship behavior has been emerging as an interesting topic for any organization these days. Katz and Kahn (1996) were the first people to identify this kind of autonomous behavior in workplace. The term Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB’s) was first coined by Dennis Organ and his colleagues (Cf. Bateman & Organ, 1983; Smith Organ, & Near, 1983). Organ (1988: 4) defined Organizational citizenship behaviors as “individual behavior that is discretionary, not directly or explicitly recognized by the formal reward system, and that in the aggregate promotes the effective functioning of the organization. By discretionary, we mean that the behavior is not an enforceable requirement of the role or the job description, that is, the clearly specifiable terms of the person’s employment contract with the organization; the behavior is rather a matter of personal choice, such that its omission is not generally understood as punishable.” Organizational citizenship behavior occurs when the individuals in organization implicitly go beyond the formal boundary of work required to do by him/her. Organization citizenship behavior can also be said to be the choice of individual to work beyond any limitation or expectations of their employers for the overall betterment of the organization. This is completely voluntary action and the employee’s work beyond the expectation of their organization. Organization citizenship behavior is gaining much attention in today’s organizations as it has several positive implications on the organizations. Organization citizenship behavior makes the employee more committed to the organization willingly and helps in promoting overall health of the organization. The employee...
Cyberloafing is a prevalent and costly problem for all organizations and has raised social concerns, and in several consequences an illegal or unethical behavior arise in incipient forms of deviant behaviors. Many researchers have defined workplace deviant behavior in different terms, such as workplace incivility (Estes, 2008), counterproductive behavior (Bennett & Robinson, 2000), organizational misbehavior (Thompson & Ackroyd, 1999), dysfunctional behavior (Jaworski & Young, 1992), and cyber loafing (Lim, 2002). The lack of self-control and procrastination (Lavoie & Pychyl, 2001) perceived internet service accessibility, environmental conditions and individual behavioral styles and when employees feel that they are not being treated well, they tend to engage in cyberloafing behaviors (Lim, Teo, & Loo, 2002; Manrique de Lara et al., 2006). In this research, the researcher has included cyber loafing as part of production deviant because the consequences of this activity many times leads to decrease employee and organizational productivity (Blanchard & Henle,
Exhausted, bitter, and miserable is the way that many people feel when they wake up in the morning to get ready for work. Even the very thought of work puts some people in a bad mood. Others may not mind work but still do not look forward to going. It is a rare occasion to find someone who is completely satisfied with his or her career. However, for one man, work is bliss. In “Quality” by Galsworthy, Gessler, the shoemaker, is shown to be a man of integrity and of complete dedication to his work.
Job satisfaction includes challenging work, interesting job assignments, equitable rewards, competent supervision, and rewarding careers. The quality of work life and psychological rewards from employment are very important. It is doubtful, however, whether many of us would continue working were it not for the money we earn. This paper establishes the definition of compensation, overview of compensation philosophy, critical components of a compensation strategy, and an example of an effective compensation practice. (www.indiana.edu/~busx420/Book.../chap09.doc)
This study aims to increase understanding of factors that influence employees’ reactions in the workplace. The relationship between conflict among employees, the perception of organizational politics, conflict or ambiguity of workplace roles and several other work outcomes was explored by studying 11 research articles to investigate individual and organizational effects of workplace attitudes and behaviors. Employees need to work together toward common goals in order for an organization to function well but there are many roadblocks hindering the process. Results demonstrated a clear relationship between stressors and behaviors.