Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Human animal relationships
Should we use animals in experiments
Human animal relationships
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Human animal relationships
Sammy, who has been trained to aid blind people, has not been adopted within a year. Of course, they are unknowledgeable to the fact he could help the indigent people because they do not take the time to determine his special gifts. Thus, the scientists decide to use him for research. The agonizing pain flows through his body as he lies on the table getting chemicals put through his tense veins. He wants to run, but the scientists have him strapped to the bed so tightly that he cannot move. As they run the chemicals through him, he cannot do anything but think of his life and extraordinary past owner he had before he got sent to the local dog shelter. Although researchers would have to find new innovations other than animal experimentation to make safe products for humans, the testing of animals should be banned.
Many animals grieve over their kind passing away in several different ways, although some people do not consider it grieving. All animals mourn losses in such ways as standing around them for a long period, or carrying them everywhere they go for periods of time. In the Mystery of Animal Grief article scientist’s state “Human beings have fixed ideas about the hearts and minds of beasts, most of them not very flattering. Animals are simpletons on the whole, sometimes capable of impressive flashes of cleverness and a kind of wagging, nuzzling, tongue-lolling love” (The Mystery of Animal Grief). Humans do not usually see the same perspective as animals when the topic is concerning grief. Humans overlook a lot of animal’s deaths’, such as running them over when seeing one in the middle of the road, passing by a flock of buzzards surrounding one of their own, or even using a weapon to harm a baby deer’s mother. Grief in anima...
... middle of paper ...
...de enough to see. If humans would open their eyes, they would come to a conclusion that testing chemicals on animals is harsh. Therefore, humans would go against the government to stop supporting animal testing and vivisection.
Works Cited
ARORA, NAMIT. “On Eating Animals.” Humanist 73.4 (2013): 26. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 30 Mar. 2014. Print.
Kluger, Jeffrey. “The Mystery Of Animal Grief.” Time 181.14 (2013): 40. Middle Search Plus. Web. 24 Feb. 2014. Print.
Talan, Jamie. “Do Animals Have Feelings?.” Scientific American Mind 17.1 (2006): 24. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 24 Feb. 2014. Print.
Tatchell, Peter. “Why Animal Research Is Bad Science.” New Statesman 133.4700 (2004): 18-19. Literary Reference Center. Web. 24 Feb. 2014. Print.
“Vivisection.” Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th edition (2013): 1. Literary Reference Center. Web. 24 Feb. 2014. Print.
The Web. The Web. 22 March 2014. Hasen, Richard. The.
middle of paper ... ... The Web. The Web. 05 Dec. 2013.
As I have progressed through this class, my already strong interest in animal ethics has grown substantially. The animal narratives that we have read for this course and their discussion have prompted me to think more deeply about mankind’s treatment of our fellow animals, including how my actions impact Earth’s countless other creatures. It is all too easy to separate one’s ethical perspective and personal philosophy from one’s actions, and so after coming to the conclusion that meat was not something that was worth killing for to me, I became a vegetarian. The trigger for this change (one that I had attempted before, I might add) was in the many stories of animal narratives and their inseparable discussion of the morality in how we treat animals. I will discuss the messages and lessons that the readings have presented on animal ethics, particularly in The Island of Doctor Moreau, The Dead Body and the Living Brain, Rachel in Love, My Friend the Pig, and It Was a Different Day When They Killed the Pig. These stories are particularly relevant to the topic of animal ethics and what constitutes moral treatment of animals, each carrying important lessons on different facets the vast subject of animal ethics.
Foer, Jonathan Safran. Eating Animals. ebook ed. New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2009. PDF file.
In the beginning of 20th century, some researchers discovered and understood that animals have emotions and feelings, but this was not enough to explain whether the emotion and feeling of creatures are able to affect the processes of life regulations.
According to an article by PETA, “experiments on animals are cruel, expensive and generally inapplicable to humans” (PETA 1). This shows how not only many laboratories and companies that use animals in their experiments are wasting money and time, but also wasting countless lives of animals. As a human, one does not have to suffer through unconsenting pain because no one would ever consent to be treated the way lab rats would be treated. A study done by the Journal of the American Medical Association, found that” medical treatments developed in animals rarely translated to humans” (Hackam, Redelmeier 1). This being said, it is not easy to comprehend why animal testing continues. However, as a community people think that “the benefits to humans does not justify the harm to animals” (Hajar 1). This goes to show how people who are pro-animal testing, marginalize the damage animal testing is doing to animals. While some may say that there needs to be alternative methods to animal testing, others may say that without animal testing it would be harder to test out new products for humans. Yet, with the information given by doctors Hackam and Redelmeier, it is clear to see that the use of animals is no longer
Pierce, Jessica. "Emotional Pain in Animals: An Invisible World of Hurt." Emotional Pain in Animals: An Invisible World of Hurt. Sussex Publisher, 24 Apr. 2012. Web. 20 Nov. 2013.
We have raised animals, just to slaughter them and put them on a plate. We hunt animals for food and even for sport. Though, as years passed and as the knowledge of self-has increased, throughout the world, several individuals have begun to wonder if animals share the same emotions human beings feel. Do they know right from wrong? Are they knowledgeable of their surrounding as humans are? With different answers, these questions are, in part, dependent on specific experiences. Most of these theories illustrate that humans alone, have a moral compass. Other arguments pose that animals and even things can have
Web. The Web. The Web. 14 May 2014. Stanley, Jay.
Orlans, F. Barbara. In the Name of Science:Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation. New York: Oxford UP: Oxford UP, 1993.
Do animals feel joy, love, fear, anguish or despair? What ere emotions, and perhaps more importantly, how do scientists prove animals are capable of emotion? Sea lion mothers have often been seen wailing painfully and squealing eerily as they watch their babies being eaten by killer whales. Buffaloes have also been observed sliding playfully across ice, excitedly screaming “Gwaaa.” Emotions are defined broadly as psychological phenomena that help in behavioral management and control. This is a challenging question to researchers who are trying to determine the answer to this question. Through current research by close observation combined with neurobiological research, evidence that animals exhibit fear, joy happiness, shame, embarrassment, resentment, jealousy, rage, anger, love, pleasure, compassion, respect, relief, disgust, sadness, despair, and grief is likely. Charles Darwin said, “The lower animals, like man, manifestly feel pleasure and pain, happiness, and misery.” I agree with Darwin. I believe animals do exhibit emotions, and denying that animals have emotions because the subject cannot be studied directly is not a reasonable explanation.