Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
difference between frankenstein book and film
review of frankenstein by mary shelley
compare and contrast Frankenstein
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: difference between frankenstein book and film
Do you ever enjoy a novel so much you think the movie will be mind-blowing with all the special effects bringing something to life; however after you saw it you were stunned about how much they left out of the novel with Hollywood putting their own crazy spin on the story? This is how I felt after enjoying reading Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, so much then watching the movie. Surprisingly it really disappointed me, which is sad because when most Americans think of Frankenstein they think of the movie version and not the novel, although you would think they would be similar, there were many differences as well as comparisons between the two.
One character thats persona was changed dramatically was Elizabeth. Not only her physical appearance but her emotions as well as actions. When she was first introduced in the novel she was described as a small orphan girl with beautiful blonde hair and an angelic glow around her body. I believe this is why Victors parents were drawn to her to take in as their own in the first place and not trying to have one of their own; because of this there is a stronger bond between Elizabeth and Victors parents throughout the novel, the mother dies in the novel after Elizabeth gets sick and is thought to be on her deathbed, she could not stand the thought of losing her daughter and became sick herself. However in the movie she dies during childbirth with William. Also when you first see Elizabeth in the movie she is a small girl with ugly brown curly hair and shy looking.
Despite Elizabeths appearance in the movie, I believe that she came out more caring and joyful in the movie rather than in the novel. Several scenes showed Victor and Elizabeth dancing around, laughing, kissing as well as sharing mul...
... middle of paper ...
...he rushed back to Geneva where he cut off Elizabeths head and hands and sewed them onto Justine's body which was supposed to be the monsters bride. After Victor did bring Elizabeth back to life the monster came back to claim what he thought was his, Elizabeth. Elizabeth had finally come to her senses and eventually lit herself on fire because she rather be dead then be the hideous self with Victor and the monster fighting over her which is the opposite with what you would think with her being the more caring and so in love with Victor person that she was.
In conclusion you see how Elizabeths character developed throughout the novel and movie and with the differences and comparisons between both. The Hollywood spin was a little much for me to grasp, the novel seemed much more realistic and enjoyable. This classic horror story has turned out to be on of my favorites.
The Film version differs quite a lot from the Novel. There were a number of changes to the plot, but most of these were only little issues. One of the major differences in plot was Matthew’s relationship with Colin. Colin was Matthew’s next door neighbour in the Novel, but there was no close friendship or relationship between them. However in the Film, Colin is Matthew’s best friend, classmate and neighbour, whom Matthew was always visiting and playing with.
Victor makes several attempts to stop the monster but all fail it solidifies the monster as a dangerous force that cannot be stopped. Every attempt Victor makes or every chance he misses it ends with another death as stated in the article: “Frankenstein believes he saw his creature in the area and concludes that he must be the real culprit. Justine is put on trial, condemned and executed. Frankenstein, who does not intervene, is overwhelmed by guilt”(Cornillon 4). The few attempts Victor makes to save his family are either stopped by the monster or Victor’s own fear. Not only does it result in a loss of a love one for Victor but it also makes severe problems to his own
On the night that Victor got married the creature killed his wife, Elizabeth, in order to get revenge from Victor. “She was there, lifeless and inanimate, thrown across the bed, her head hanging down” (Shelley, 186). The moment when he killed Elizabeth was not the same as when he killed the little brother. When the creature had murdered Elizabeth it had been much more violently than the first, showing that his desire for revenge had become much more stronger, as it was the only feeling he showed. He had begun to act like the monster that everyone had believed he was, showing no more of the humane feelings he had showed previously in the
Elizabeth’s life disappears, along with Victor’s happiness. On their wedding night, Victor takes the hand of Elizabeth and says “if you knew what I have suffered and what I may endure” (Shelley 166). Victor wishes he could tell Elizabeth his sad tale, but he tells himself to tell her after the wedding. He knows the monster will come soon to take revenge on him because of the others the monster took away from him. When Victor leaves Elizabeth alone and paces through the house, he “heard a shrill and dreadful scream” (Shelley 167). The monster takes his revenge on Victor by taking his one and only love away from him on his wedding night. After her death, Victor spirals into agony and despair. Without happiness, Victor’s life
One more major difference is the Capulet’s tomb. In the book the tomb was said to be dark and dingy. Though in the movie the tomb appeared to be a beautiful almost church like cathedral the tomb had many candles around where Juliet laid. Also she does not lie in a coffin but in a beautiful bed that is encompassed by white sheets.
In the book Frankenstein Virtue is found at the margins of society more often than at its center. If this is so, Victor Frankenstein's Monster is a real find! His creature is an isolate of great sensitivity, kindness, and insight. In reality the Monster was not a bad person. He is quite distress and asks Victor, "What was I? Of my creation I was absolutely ignorant: but I knew that I possessed no money, no friends, no kind of property.... Was I then a monster, a blot upon the earth from which all men fled, and whom all men disowned?" (Shelley 89). Finally the creature makes clear his great need: he is lonely, one of a kind, and unloved. He has learned the importance of position, family, and property. It also seems that the Monster was quite lonely and did not have any friends. He is unaccepted even by his own creator. No offence that the creature was ugly but it was not his fault because he did not created him. There are things to enjoy in the movie "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein", directed by the Kenneth Branagh. Branagh has used film techniques in such a way that it shows the sadness and loneliness of the monster. Yet the director interested in technical effects could highlight key ideas. For example, the excitement of opening in the frozen north, with one figure moving across the ice and receding into the distance while another suddenly appears hundreds of miles from land, could hold the attention of the audience. The relationship between isolated figures on a vast expanse of ice could serve as a poetic leit-motif in the film and retain a significant element of the novel. The cold and sterile elements assume greater meaning than a senselessly rampaging creature engulfed by fire. The monster wanted love from his creator and from the world. He did not have any friend in the world to share his sorrow. When the monster meets the blind father De Lacey, he realized his chance for friendship relied more on hearing than sight. The old man's blindness surely overcome human prejudice against physical ugliness, De Lacey commiserated with the Monster and graciously offered him help and friendship. But the reaction of the old man's sighted family upon seeing the Monster desperately clinging to their father deemed him a fiendish threat and the creature found himself drive out of the society of cottagers.
The 1931 version of Frankenstein was very similar to the novel and kept the essence of Shelly’s message. Although Shelly herself grew up in an affluent society and came from a family of intellectuals, she sees danger in excess knowledge and the advancement. Her anti-intellectualism and anti- exploration stem from her fear of the results. She doesn’t see many benefits or feel that the positives of advancement will outweigh the bad. The movie version of the novel changed the perspective of the story and added its own creative details. The movie enhances the actions being done by both the monster and Frankenstein which emphasized the dangers that arose from intellectual exploration. Both the novel and movie serve as a warning for advancement based on Shelly’s principals.
First, one of the changes between the film and the play's the ages of Abigail Williams and John Proctor. In the play Abigail was represented as a child no more than 12 years old, and John was at least 60 years old in the play. But in the film Abigail was 17 years old and John was 30 years old and they had an affair. These changes cause a different outlook on the two characters. It also allowed them to be more memorable, because
...became obsessed with his studies. He became very ill and created a monster. He then was nursed back to health and was getting better by his friend Henry. Just as you thought everything was getting better terror struck again. He lost his brother William to the monster. By creating this monster Victor became the monster himself. When he created the monster it killed his brother William, which led to the execution of his friend Justine. The monster later killed his old school mate Henry Clerval, and the love of his life Elizabeth which days later caused the death of his Father. Everyone around him that he loved was dying. The monster knew no better, the monster was lonely and had no place to go so it took revenge in Victor, and everything he loved. Victor was the real monster here by creating one. By creating the monster it caused much devastation throughout his life.
Frankenstein Over Time Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein is impressive, entertaining, and fascinating, so it is no surprise there have been so many films and artworks influenced by her novel. Many of which have put their own spin to the horror novel, especially the character of the creature that remains one of the most recognized icons in horror fiction. However, there have been critics who argue modern versions and variations have lost the horror and passion that is an essential to the creature. The start of the Creature is bound to be one book. However, public impression of the Creature has changed severely since the publication of the original novel, leading to diverse styles and plot lines in its diverse film adaptations.
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley is a very complex book riddled with underlying messages. From the characteristics of each individual to the main storyline Shelley depicts a world of opposites. Victor Frankenstein, a privileged young man, defies nature when his obsession with life and death has him attempting to bring someone/something to life. He succeeds and quickly goes from obsessed over its creation to disgust with its form. He then rejects his creation, which sets the stage for the terrifying events to come. This is the embodiment of a modern novel as it contains alienation, disillusionment, and a critique of science.
Elizabeth's role in the novel was Victor's foundation. Elizabeth would write letters to Victor, which really helped him get through many of his difficult struggles. For example Elizabeth says, "Get well and return to us. You will find a happy, cheerful home and friends who love you dearly" (98). These letters also helped reassure Victor that his family still loved and cared for him. Victor was in shock, and did not know how to react when finding Elizabeth dead. For example Victor says, "I was bewildered, in a cloud of wonder and horror. The death of William, the execution of Justine, the murder of Clerval, and lastly of my wife" (342). This statement shows that
Frankenstein is a fictional story written by Mary Shelly. It was later adapted into a movie version directed by James Whales. There are more differences than similarities between the book and the movie. This is because, the movie is mainly based on the 1920’s play, other than the original Mary Shelly’s book Frankenstein. A text has to be altered in one way or the other while making a movie due to a number of obvious factors. A lot of details from the book were missing in the movie, but the changes made by Whales were effective as they made the movie interesting, and successful.
The creature had planned that him and his wife would go to South America and live there where no one could bother the both of them. Victor believes this is a well instructed plan and he starts his work at creating the monsters wife. Once Victor had started his work he stopped and pondered on the idea that what if the creatures started to have children or if they tried to attack humans. Victor made the decision that he would not continue to build the creators wife. Then the creature was in an uproar that Victor had gone back on his word. He then went and killed the victors love elizabeth strangling her to death. Victor was so upset that he decide that he would spend the rest of his days looking for his creature to get revenge. He does fall short of his plans to seek out the creature. The Creature finds victor before victor could find him and the creature killed
Moving onto the significant differences between the two. Imagery, body language, mood, and tone are all important literature elements that could be portrayed better in the film. This is due to the fact that the (written) play depends more on imagination. On the other hand, the film relies more on the audience’s senses. Tom's and Amanda relationship occurred to be stronger in the movie than it was explained in the play. The atmosphere in the movie is rather ill and boring than it is in the play. When it comes to lighting, it was more dim in the play to reflect a memory. In the film, it wasn't as dimmed because the memory could be reflected in different ways. Moreover, images, that were flashed in a screen device, did not exist in the film. In the movie, the atmosphere was more boring and ill than it was in the play.