Disadvantages Of Excessive Risk Making

1482 Words3 Pages

SHP does indeed present managers with a single clear objective. However, the concept of maximising shareholders’ interest does not come without downsides. This paper contends that shareholders place unnecessary pressure on managers to meet this objective that managers start doing unscrupulous things at the expense of the well-being of the company. Therefore, it is argued that downsides of SHP are too far reaching as it encourages irresponsibility and does not encourage managers in making accountable decisions. Two main arguments will be presented in the next few paragraphs - excessive risk-taking and short-termism.

The first argument is that SHP encourages excessive risk-taking. The 2007 Global Financial Crisis (“GFC”) is an exemplary example …show more content…

The more we give in to the priority of shareholders, the less managers are making responsible decisions.

The second argument that seeks to illustrate irresponsible behaviour is the the engagement of short-termism. Short-termism is defined as “the focus of investors and managers on short-term returns at the expense of those over the longer-term” and that the “excessive focus of some corporate leaders, investors, and analysts on short-term, quarterly earnings and a lack of attention to the strategy, fundamentals, and conventional approaches to long-term value …show more content…

For example, it may lead managers into making cuts on necessary research and development which is beneficial for future growth and eliminating jobs just because it is beneficial in the short run (for example, BP has not been doing so well but has chose to sacrifice 2000 employees that they would need for long term growth for dividend payouts to its shareholders). These behaviours are detrimental in the long term as they do not promote sustain growth and stability in the

More about Disadvantages Of Excessive Risk Making

Open Document