Disabilities Education Act Inclusion

2015 Words5 Pages

Inclusion
The Education for All Handicapped Children Act [P.L. (Public Law) 94-142] established in 1975 provided landmark legislation to individuals with disabilities assuring they would receive an appropriate education in the least restrictive environment (LRE). There have been various amendments made to this law, including renaming it to Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in 1990 and the alignment of the law’s provisions with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) in 2004. As a result of this legislation, there has been an emphasis on access to the general education setting and curricula for students with disabilities, including students with emotional behavioral disorders.
When IDEA was reauthorized in 2004, many experts from various …show more content…

The IDEA group believes the role of special education should continue to be the most intensive Tier within the RTI framework with little change in the status quo of its program. In contrast, the NCLB group believes that special education is ineffective because its interventions have never been that different from those delivered within the general education setting. The NCLB group advocates a problem-solving approach that at best blurs the role of special education. Both group’s beliefs are concerning for students with EBD because “although much of the two groups’ thinking on RTI is well formed, neither has yet developed a persuasive plan to meet the academic needs of our nation’s most difficult-to-teach children” (Fuchs, 2010, p. …show more content…

monograph) Therefore, another little known area of teacher training that could potentially have a significant positive effect on students with emotional behavior disorders is the Interconnected Systems Framework (ISF) which builds from the platform of positive behavior interventions and support (PBIS). Barrett, Eber, & Weist (2012) describe ISF as a proposed and developing interconnection of (PBIS) and School Mental Health (SMH) systems to improve educational outcomes for all children and youth, especially those with or at risk of developing mental health challenges. SMH systems provides mental health programs and services in school broadly training and encouraging social and emotional learning and life skills, preventing emotional and behavioral problems, identifying and intervening in these problems early on, and providing intervention for established problems. The expansion and execution of “ISF has the potential of changing the attitudes and behavior of the professionals in these two systems by linking them into a complementary process that is broad in scope and utilizes the combined strengths of each” (Barrett, Eber, & Weist, 2012, p.

Open Document