The United States has been known world-wide for entertainment surrounding the police, judiciary, and incarceration systems. These shows and movies are filled with violence - and at the end, the “bad guys” (criminals) always lose to the “good guys” (law enforcement). But this poses the question: should criminals be treated badly due to their offenses? It is common sense that when one breaks the law, they should be punished for it. However, do the crimes committed take away the humanity of the convict? Prisoners are still citizens of the United States and therefore have rights. America’s Incarceration System continues to fail to meet the needs and rights of prisoners due to issues such as overcrowding, lack of health care, discrimination, and sexual assault.
Incarceration in the United States are at an all-time high and are the worst in the world. This contributes to state prisons becoming overpopulated and less efficient. First and foremost we incarcerate people for justice, we punish them to set things right and pay the debt they owe to the victims of their crimes and society. Incarceration seeks to fulfill four different purposes. The first purpose incapacitation, getting the offender off the street so they can no longer commit crimes, and so they can no longer be a danger to society. Secondly we incarcerate as retribution for the crime committed, the criminal needs to be punished for what they have done. Another purpose is deterrence, a strategy to stop criminal behavior before it happens
As expensive as prison is, it can be a bargain when it comes to keeping violent criminals from preying on the innocent. But loading our prisons with non-violent offenders, often for drug violations, means that there is less room for the more dangerous repeat criminals. The end result is that we have a higher percentage of people in prisons than any other nation on earth-South Africa being a distant second. Although we have passed the dubious milestone of having more than a million Americans in prison, we feel less safe today than ever before.
While some people like to blame poverty on crime, it’s actually the opposite that is true. Criminals prevent lower income people from making progress and a single robbery can financially break a person or new business. As lower income people are twice as likely to be victims of violent crime it is vital that we make this change to provide them the same opportunity for success as the rest of Americans. The solution to this is two-fold. First laws must be changed reducing some victimless crimes from felonies to misdemeanors and second a federal three strikes policy to take felons off the streets forever. 82% of property criminals and 71% of violent criminals are arrested for new crimes after released. As repeat offenders clog up the courts, overburden the
Today, a vicious cycle of poverty, criminality, and incarceration traps too many Americans and weakens too many communities. And many aspects of our criminal justice system may actually exacerbate these problems, rather than alleviate them.
In more recent years, criminological theories have appeared in several variations from biological, psychological, and sociological perspectives. For the most part, criminologists have devised explanations to describe the nature of crimes, what causes an individual to adopt criminal behavior, and the reasons why some people in poor neighborhoods do not subscribe to criminal behaviors. Also, there are other factors which come into play to explain why criminal behavior occurs at an all-time high. Some of the factors that relate to crime are social groups, lack of educational opportunities, and of financial resources. The combination of the factors listed motivate criminal behavior among young people and adults. However, criminologists have created various explanations to gain a deeper comprehension of why criminal activities occur. There is an extensive amount of theories available to scholars to describe criminal behavior in an effort to identify the earliest phase of criminology in an individual. The
Crime is an in inevitable occurrence in today 's culture. Despite the best efforts of our country 's criminal justice system, crime continues to be on the rise. In an effort to reverse this rising tide, efforts are being made to understand the underlying cause of crime and factors that can lead an individual into the life of crime. From the sociological perspective, there are three theories that are used to explain the cause of crime. They are the social structure theory, the bad neighborhood theory, and the social process theory.
Nationally, every 7 minutes, another person enters prison. And every 14 minutes, someone returns to the streets, beaten down and, more often than not, having suffered a great amount of violence during his or her incarceration. Professionals will tell you that incarceration really does very little to stop crime, but we go on spending billions of dollars in order to lock up more and more people. We have become the country with the highest incarceration rate in the industrialized world. (National Criminal Justice Commission)
Crime is a highly complex and important problem that changes across cultures and across time. This briefing provides a summary of some of the key explanations that try to explain the causes of crime. It is by no means a thorough list. Each of the explanations covered has its own strengths and weaknesses, has gaps and may only be related to certain types of crime, and not others. There is no “right” or “wrong” explanation to justify it.
Today, half of state prisoners are serving time for nonviolent crimes. Over half of federal prisoners are serving time for drug crimes. Mass incarceration seems to be extremely expensive and a waste of money. It is believed to be a massive failure. Increased punishments and jailing have been declining in effectiveness for more than thirty years. Violent crime rates fell by more than fifty percent between 1991 and 2013, while property crime declined by forty-six percent, according to FBI statistics. Yet between 1990 and 2009, the prison population in the U.S. more than doubled, jumping from 771,243 to over 1.6 million (Nadia Prupis, 2015). While jailing may have at first had a positive result on the crime rate, it has reached a point of being less and less worth all the effort. Income growth and an aging population each had a greater effect on the decline in national crime rates than jailing. Mass incarceration and tough-on-crime policies have had huge social and money-related consequences--from its eighty billion dollars per-year price tag to its many societal costs, including an increased risk of recidivism due to barbarous conditions in prison and a lack of after-release reintegration opportunities. The government needs to rethink their strategy and their policies that are bad