Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The causes of crime rates essay
Adult justice system vs juvenile similarities
Negative effects of juvenile justice system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The causes of crime rates essay
Criminal offenses can be performed by anybody, both the seniors and the juniors in the society. The law, however, handles these criminal offenses differently according to age. Many people feel that juvenile justice is a bit hard on the children and could result in gangs, but it is my opinion that it benefits the children by correcting them and showing them a brighter future, while at the same time making the society safe. Minors more so than not aren 't prosecuted when they commit crimes, unlike the adults. However, delinquent acts are taken against them as a form of rehabilitation and corrective measure. Whereas adults have the right to a public trial by a jury, juveniles do not have this right. Instead, juvenile charges involve a judge who …show more content…
Naturally, both of them involve people with criminal accusations. Both systems offer the right to an attorney to the accused. The right to cross-examine and confront witnesses are also granted to both minors and adults in the justice systems as this grants equality and fairness to the defendant. After the arrest of the individual, whether a juvenile or an adult, they are entitled and have the right to be notified of their charges (LaMance, 2013). It is also a right of the accused to be convicted of their crimes by the court. The prosecution is entitled to provide a beyond reasonable doubt proof of the crime at hand before the suspected is to be …show more content…
These variables directly affect the juvenile crime rate because the more of these behaviors we see, the more likely we are to see an increase in juvenile offenses. For example, in these trying times, the economy is weak and may lead to people losing their homes. It may be out of the parents ' hands and could ultimately result in inadequate housing for their families. It could also force the parents to relocate their families to high crime
July 15, 1999, was an ordinary night for Kristopher Lohrmeyer as he left work at the Colorado City Creamer, a popular ice cream parlor. Kristopher had no idea that his life was about to end. When Michael Brown, 17, Derrick Miller and Andrew (Andy) Medina, 15, approached Kristopher and demanded his money and his car keys. Before the boys knew it shots had been fired and Kristopher was dead. About an hour after the fatal shooting of Kristopher Lohrmeyer, all three men were in custody and telling their version of the night’s events. Michael and Derrick who had run away after the shooting confessed to police and named Andy as the shooter. According to the three boy’s testimony, they had only recently met and needed away to get some quick cash, so they developed a carjacking scheme and headed to Andy’s house to pick up 2 stolen handguns. The three boys were uneducated and had spent most of their time on the streets in search of drugs. The judge ruled that they would be held without bail and there was probable cause to charge them all with first-degree murder (Thrown Away, 2005).
Juvenile court is a special court that deals with under age defendants that are charged with crimes, who are neglected, or out of their parent’s control. The average age of the Defendants are younger than 18, but juvenile court doesn’t have jurisdiction in cases in which a minor is charged as an adult. The procedure of juvenile court is to involve parents or social workers and probation officers in order to achieve positive results and prevent minors from future crimes. However, serious crimes and repeated offenses can result in the juvenile offender being sentenced to a prison, with a transfer to a state prison when they reach adulthood. According to the film “Prison States”, Christel Tribble’s was a 15-year-old from Kentucky who was diagnosed
Today, the court system in this country is divided into two groups when comparing juveniles and adults. One is the Adult Criminal Justice System, and the other is the Juvenile Justice System. The terminology can be very different between the two systems. For instance; if an adult is arrested, they will be subject to a bail hearing. If a juvenile is arrested they must go through a detention hearing. Adults have trials which can be decided by a judge or jury. Juveniles go through a fact finding hearing and don’t receive verdicts because they are adjudicated. “They are not found guilty, but delinquent or involved” (Komiscruk). Another difference between the two is that juvenile court rooms are usually closed to the public, which includes the media. Their records are often confidential, protecting children from carrying the burdens of their delinquent activity into adulthood. Also, their records are supposed to be sealed. But what happens when a juvenile’s criminal case is transferred to an adult court? Are the guidelines or rules different from any other adult offender? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the sentencing guidelines?
According to criminal.findlaw.com the definition of the juvenile justice system is the area of criminal law applicable to people not old enough to be held responsible for criminal acts. Juveniles are people 17 and under. Juveniles should be convicted as adults for violent crimes like assault or murder etcetera because if they can commit an adult crime they should get an adult punishment. Also if juveniles don’t get punished for their crimes then they’ll keep doing it because they got off unpunished the first time.
This infers the infraction the minor is accepted to have submitted is of a less genuine nature. Since they are not grown-ups, adolescents are not managed the privilege to an open trial by jury. Their cases are chosen by a judge alone. Nonetheless, the procedures in grown-up and adolescent criminal courts are very comparable in that confirmation is introduced, declaration is given and witnesses are addressed. In numerous states, the standards of confirmation are less formal in adolescent court, making it less demanding for both offended party and respondent to exhibit their case. For grown-ups discovered blameworthy of a wrongdoing, the courts center on discipline. Basically, they endeavor to force a punishment that will make it more outlandish for the person to carry out a comparative wrongdoing again later on. Detainment is the most as often as possible utilized methods for discipline. Nonetheless, the adolescent court framework centers on attempting to restore the minor. Parole and probation are regularly utilized, as are diversionary projects. Each state makes its own diversionary
What is important to understand in terms at the difference between the juvenile and adult system is that there is a level of dependency that is created tween the two and the juvenile system focuses on how to help rather than in prison individuals at such a young age. However, it usually depends on the type of crimes that have been committed and what those crimes me for the families and how they impact of the greater society. The adult system distinguishes between dependence and delinquency mainly because there was a psychological transition that occurs with juveniles that is not always a predictor of a cyclical life of crime. However, if an adult is committed to the justice system there can be a dependency of delinquency and a cycle of crime that is more likely to be sustained at that age and level of cognitive ability then in comparison to a juvenile. The reasoning behind this is important is that is focused on maintaining a level of attention to the needs and capacity abilities of individuals living and working in different types of societies (Zinn et al.,
The main difference in them is that the juvenile court system’s main goal is to help the youth. Everyone that is part of the system wants to help the juvenile. They want to rehabilitate them, so they can go on living a normal, crime free life. The adult court systems set out for justice. They want punishment. The juvenile court system is based on civil laws not criminal laws. This shows that they seek rehabilitation and not punishment. (Fradella & Neubauer, 2011, pp. 500). The juvenile court system is also private. The adult court systems allows people to sit in the sessions, but the sessions in the juvenile courts are closed to the public and the names are not released. The jurisdictions of the two court systems are different as well. The adult court system jurisdiction is based off of the crime committed, whether it was a federal law that was broken or a state law that was broken. For juveniles the jurisdiction is based off of age. The age varies state to state. For example, in New York, a 16-year-old is considered an adult, and in Pennsylvania the cut off age is 17 (Fradella & Neubauer, 2011, pp.
The juvenile system is based on the ideas of treatment and rehabilitation, while the adult system is based on the ideas of punishment. Another issue arises when discussion of waiving cases to the adult system due to juvenile mental capacity. Studies found that the “mental capacity of youth under the age of 16 to stand (adult) trial is far below that of a similarly charged adults” (Siegel & Welsh, p. 365). Therefore, this proves that many juveniles do not understand the consequences of their action and should not be sentenced the same.
Juvenile justice is the decision whether or not to charge a juvenile as an adult. When a Juvenile is charged as an adult, they are sentenced to long prison terms and sometimes life. In 2012 two groups of judges came together, one group believes that Juveniles should be allowed to be sentenced to life in prison and the other group believes that Juveniles should not be allowed to be sentenced to life in prison. I agree with the group of judges that believe that juveniles should not be sentenced to life in prison.
This is mainly due to the fact that while they are both court systems in America, there are some definite differences between the juvenile and adult courts that are undeniable. For instance, the court hearing for adolescents is extremely different in the juvenile justice system when compared to the adult justice system (Scott & Soulier, 2010). The differences begin when juveniles are awaiting for their day at court. In the hearing beforehand, the court makes the decision as to whether or not the youth should be held in a detention hall and without bail (Scott & Soulier, 2010). However, there is another court hearing that adolescents can be subject to when their position is being questioned on whether they need to post bail or not. There could also be a fact-finding hearing if the court find that the minor is a threat to themselves, the public or if there is not a parent who is able to take care of them (Scott & Soulier, 2010). While it is similar to the adult justice system concerning whether or not the criminal would be able given bail or be held in prison without bail; the main difference is the fact-finding hearing for adolescents. That kind of hearing does not exist for adult
There has always been controversies as to whether juvenile criminals should be tried as adults or not. Over the years more and more teenagers have been involved in committing crimes. In some cases the juries have been too rough on the teens. Trying teens as adults can have a both positive and negative views. For example, teens that are detained can provide information about other crimes, can have an impact in social conditions, and serve as experience; however, it can be negative because teens are still not mature enough for that experience, they are exposed to adult criminals; and they will lose out on getting an education.
Over the years many laws and policies have been created and altered. As a result many activities have become illegal. With so many laws in place now, juvenile crime is also on the rise. More and more juveniles are being sent to prison than ever before. The goal of the juvenile justice system was to rehabilitate but now it is more focused on punishment. However, many rehabilitation programs are still in place to help delinquent juveniles get back on the path to becoming successful productive members of society. One program that comes to mind is the restorative justice program.
Broken families, lack of education, substance abuse, socioeconomic status, peer pressure including gang activity and trauma can cause or influence criminal activity. Adolescents need a family unit. They need to be nurtured and protected by a parent or parent figure to develop morals and standards. This is where a youth learns and understands right from wrong, compassion and tolerance. Without these lessons youth become susceptible to criminal behavior because simply put they never learned it was not okay. Without a positive parent figure youth might not understand the importance of education and fall into the truancy. Truancy causes low grades and limits their positive social interaction. Even as youth grow older their education level stays the same, causing low self-esteem. Truancy, low self-esteem and substance abuse goes hand in hand. The drugs that are assessable to today’s youth are cheap and extremely easy to get. Drug use/ substance abuse mixed with low self-esteem, and, lack of parental guidance is a huge factor in life long criminal behavior and can be attributed to youth that have experienced some type of trauma in their
Juveniles deserve to be tried the same as adults when they commit certain crimes. The justice systems of America are becoming completely unjust and easy to break through. Juvenile courts haven’t always been known to the everyday person.
"Don't do the crime, if you can't do the time." -- David Grusin and Morgan Ames Much controversy exists on the question of whether a juvenile criminal should be punished to the same extent as an adult. Those who commit capital crimes, including adolescents, should be penalized according to the law. Age should not be a factor in the case of serious crimes.