Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sleepy hollow book vs movie
The sleepy hollow movie contrast from book
The comparison between the book and film the legend of sleepy hollow
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sleepy hollow book vs movie
The characters in the selections occasionally were altered in order to tell the story. Some modifications with characters are showcased in “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow”. In the book, the main character Ichabod Crane is a schoolteacher (W. Irving 16). In the movie, however, Ichabod Crane is shown as a detective, who had his own way of thinking about how crimes were to be solved, and he was sent to Sleepy Hollow to solve the murder of three townspeople (The Legend of Sleepy Hollow). The producer revived this scene from the book in order to make the movie more suspenseful. A teacher is alright, but a detective trying to solve the murder of three townspeople just adds a little more suspense, and helps to spark interest in the audience. Also in …show more content…
By changing the beginning of the movie, the producer was able to create a more impactful story. While these selections show many contrasting character choices within them, there are also many similarities between the character choice the producer did not change. In “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow”, the horse is shown to be black and keeps the name Gunpowder (W. Irving 16, The Legend of Sleepy Hollow). The producer most likely did not change this due to the fact black is a more mysterious color, and the color of Gunpowder helps to establish the atmosphere. The black horse is used to establish he is not friendly and the townspeople should stay away. Within the book and movie of “Rappaccini’s Daughter”, the character Giovanni remains the same (N. Hawthorne 62, Rappaccini’s Daughter). If the producer were to alter Giovanni’s feelings towards Beatrice, the love aspect that the story brings would disappear. By keeping Giovanni’s character similar to how it was in the book, the viewer is able to see Giovanni’s feelings towards Beatrice causing them to feel emotion towards the two …show more content…
In some instances, a producer may need to change the setting from how the author originally entrenched it. In “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow”, the townspeople reside in Greensburg, which is a town referred to as Tarry Town. Sleepy Hollow is just a nearby village (W. Irving, 16). In the movie, the producer has the townspeople residing in Sleepy Hollow (The Legend of Sleepy Hollow). The producer changes this in order to create more horror in the town where the villagers live. All the action takes place in Sleepy Hollow, therefore establishing a more horrific atmosphere. Furthermore in “Rappaccini’s Daughter”, the setting was altered. In the movie, Beatrice only stays inside and outside her house in her garden. Because of this, only Giovanni and Rappaccini have seen her (Rappaccini’s Daughter). In the book, a few people have seen Beatrice as she didn't always stay inside (N. Hawthorne 62). The setting change of Beatrice’s location was changed in order to make a more dramatic story. The fact that Giovanni was the only person who had seen her before, besides her father, makes their love stronger. In addition to “Rappaccini’s Daughter” and “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow”, in another story “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall”, the setting has also been differed from book to movie. In the book the setting is all inside Granny’s house (KA. Porter 697), while in the movie the setting is inside Granny’s house
There are many conclusions we can draw from the characters as well the storylines from the book and movie. It is up to each of us to decide what kind of characters we want to see; just as it is our own choice in deciding how the story ends. Katrina Van Tassel, Brom Bones, and Ichabod Crane will always be central to the story of The Legend of Sleepy Hollow, just as they are important to the nuances of the story, but it is up to us, the readers and viewers, to draw our own conclusions about the headless horseman.
This movie is categorized as a traditional translation because it follows the story's plot and idea but it has some differences compared to the book. In the middle of the movie, Ichabod Crane first meets Katrina Van Tassel at the field where Katrina’s suitors set up picnic. In the book, Ichabod first meets Katrina when he was waiting for instructions for psalmody at the church. When Ichabod was invited to Katrina’s Halloween party, he rides a donkey in the film however in the book Ichabod borrows a horse fr...
Have you ever read a book and then watched the movie and saw many differences? Well you can also find lots of similarities. In the book “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and the movie “Tom and Huck” there are many similarities and differences having to do with the characters personalities, the setting, the characters relationships with one another and the events that take place.
In both situations, greed and lust lead to the destruction of a person. The original story by Washington Irving, Ichabod Crane desired so much the Van Tassel estate that he was pushed to fall in love Katrina, therefore angering the local Brom. Ichabod Crane greed led him to his destruction. He was to never return to sleepy hollow and ended up losing not only the girl but also the estate he wanted. One can conclude that indeed Ichabod was seen as a greedy man who would do just about anything to get what he wanted. In contrast, it is evident that in the movie he is portrayed completely different; he is a humble man who just wants to get his job done. Instead, Katrina’s stepmother is the jealous one in the movie directed by Tim Burton. She wants to control money and land which causes her to use the supernatural in order to obtain what she wants. The movie does a good job in keeping it with suspense but Burton decided to take control and show he own version of what happened to Ichabod. Katrina’s mother used the headless horseman to her advantage in order to take revenge especially on the Van Tassels. It was not just the family she was seeking revenge on but any who would at one point have control of the inheritance. Tim Burton chose to use the theme from the original story yet incorporate into his own vision. He was to make Ichabod the main character and the hero of the
The movie and the story had some of the same characters but some weren't exactly the same. The movie introduced many different characters and changed some of the others. For example, the movie had the plant lady and had the mentor of Anderton as the founders of Precrime while in the book, Anderton was the only founder of Precrime. Also, Witwer wasn't blond he had black hair and Kapler wasn't named Kapler he was named Crow. In the story they had the red head Fleming who did not exist
At this point, the readers create their own movie in a way. They will determine important aspects of how the character speaks, looks like, and reacts. Whereas, in the movie, the reader has no choice but to follow the plot laid out in front of them. No longer can they picture the characters in their own way or come up with their different portrayals. The fate of the story, while still unpredictable, was highly influenced by the way the characters looked, spoke, and presented themselves on screen.
settings of the two different stories are located in different areas, where the film used
Another very crucial point to the overall story is the mutual fascination between the children and Boo Radley (Arthur Radley). Boo constantly leaves objects (a watch, two soap dolls, a knife…etc) in the hollow of a tree on his property. Just as Boo does this, the children are constantly devising plans to look in the windows of the Radley house, to sneak into the back yard…etc. This was largely important to the story because it built upon the viewer’s opinion of the children, leading us to believe them having large capacity for imagination from their stories on Boo eating only squirrels and any cats he can get his hands on, and having them believe the stories as well! And all of these instances, the children’s stories, the fact that Boo never comes out of his house in sight of others, the stories of others concerning the Radley’s, the gifts in the tree hollow, lead us to believe Boo to be some sort of...
The main characters in each of the stories face different conflicts. In Sleepy Hollow, Ichabod Crane goes through one major problem. He has an obsession with ghosts, goblins, and witches. Everybody believed Sleepy Hollow was haunted, but he believed it more than anybody. He loved reading about them and telling ghost stories. Every time he heard a scary story, he would believe in it with all his heart. One time, Ichabod was at a party at the Van Tassel Farm. When everybody was telling stories,
Another difference is the fact that in the book Brom Bones confronts Ichabod Crane one time, and in the movie Brom Bones appears to confront Ichabod on numerous occasions. In the move, Brom conducted major pranks on Ichabod. The most significant difference is the ending of the story. In the story, the horse was actually borrowed from the Van Tassels family. On the other hand, in the movie the horse is introduced as Ichabod Crane's horse. When the most anticipated scene, the one where Ichabod Cranes is being chased by the Headless Horseman in the book and movie happens, is where the most differences are apparent. In the book, the horse stays where Ichabod dies, also many important pieces are missing in the movie. In the movie, the horse was not there, his saddle was only
Some modifications with characters are showcased in “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow”. In the book, the main character Ichabod Crane is a schoolteacher. In the movie, however, Ichabod Crane is shown as a detective, who had his own way of thinking on how crimes were to be solved, and he was sent to Sleepy Hollow to solve the murder of three townspeople. The producer revived this scene from the book in order to make the movie more suspenseful. A teacher is alright, but a detective trying to solve the murder of three townspeople just adds a little more suspense, and helps to spark interest in the audience. Also in the book, Ichabod is used to show the theme of greed, as he was portrayed as a greedy man. While in the movie, Ichabod is not used to show the theme of greed. This modification was imperative to the character of Ichabod because he is made the hero in the movie, while the book he had a completely different outcome. Another excellent selection that shows contrast within the characters is “Rappaccini’s Daughter”. In this book Baglioni just wanted to beat Rappaccini, as they are very competitive with each other, but he is horrified by the results. In the movie, Baglioni just wants to help Beatrice escape and for her and Giovanni to fall in love. The character portrayal of Baglioni is quite different between the book and movie. The producer felt the need to alter Baglioni because he is not
Although at times it is easy to get carried away with the adventure of a story, noticing the elements a writer has put into his work is very important. In reading “Young Goodman Brown” and “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow” you can see both similarities as well as differences of how both Nathaniel Hawthorne and Washington Irving chose to illuminate their romantic writing styles. The writers both use a mystical woodsy setting with supernatural twists to draw in readers. Underlying you will find the differing romantic themes each writer used, as well as how each writer chose to end their work.
A major difference between "The Legend of Sleepy Hollow" (1820), by Washing Irving, and the film adaption by the same name, directed by Tim Burton (1999) is the characterization of Ichabod Crane, Katrina van Tassel, and the Headless Horseman, in particular regard to their personalities, appearance, and behavior. Ichabod is very tall, lanky,
“The Legend of Sleepy Hollow”, one of the most classic books of all time, written by Washington Irving, was remade into a movie in 1999 by Director Tim Burton. Surprisingly there are many differences between the book and the movie, and little to no similarities. One of the major differences was that in the movie Tim Burton made Ichabod Crane a detective, while in the story he’s a nerdy teacher. Tim Burton did this to make the movie more interesting and for there to be a reason why Ichabod is so good at finding clues and solving the headless horseman case. Also they made Ichabod a little bit more brave in the movie so that there would be more action and drama in the movie. A total different between the story and the movie, is that they give a background of young Ichabod and his mother, but none of that was
The Hound of the Baskervilles written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and the movie The Hound of the Baskervilles directed by Jeremy Bret are two works of art that are mainly telling the same story. There are, however, many differences about the book and the movie. Those differences don’t affect the outcome of the story, but they give less impact to the story. Along with the differences there are many similarities, and those similarities give you confidence that it is the same story.