Deborah Tannen's Use Of Direct Communication Styles Between Men And Women

1112 Words3 Pages

In a society where there is gender disparity and equality seemingly discarded, a status quo between men and women is very crucial. Therefore, the respect to woman by the society can only be earned upon adopting some masculine techniques of doing things. Communication is one such technique that various authors have proposed as a distinct method of ensuring gender equality. For example, Deborah Tannen is one such author who has made contributions this discussion and holds a point of convergence male and female gender applies different communication styles. In addition, the author is of the opinion that women can only gain an equal status to their male peers only if they adopt direct communication styles, which include giving orders and exercising authority. This is one of the strongest
In this regards, Tannen suggests that equality platform between men and women is only achievable only if women begins learning “male style of communication, including giving direct orders”. It is through learning male’s ways of communication that women can win social respect in this business world and gain equal measure of advancement in various career portfolios.

Deborah Tannen in her article, “Can’t we Talk” gives very incisive discussion about the importance of adopting direct communication styles between men and women in order to advance their respective careers and status in the house. The author uses various cases to justify the need for women to adopt direct communication styles in order to earn equal status in the society. For example, the women who requested her husband for a stopover to have some coffee was shuttered, and felt very disappointed. However, had she adopted direct communication styles with her husband, and then she would let her way in. Indeed, she allowed her demands to be compromised by a masculine voice, which

Open Document