Difference Between Structural Functionalism And Structural Interaction

730 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Criticism of structural functionalism

Symbolic interaction is micro-sociology that influences how we interact with other individuals. Structural functionalism is the macro-sociology that influences how a community function in society through dysfunction. Symbolic interaction theorists would look at disproportionate school discipline incommensurable than structural functionalist. Symbolic Interaction is the individual interactions between people and how that influences their behavior. Those individual interactions between people is what influence society. Social institutions are what influences, creates, and sustains relationships. They attach meaning to symbols, body language, words, gestures, images, and how we interplay with each other from those meanings. Symbolic interaction is also considered the labeling theory. Symbolic is micro-sociology with individual interactions. In contrast, structural functionalism is macro-sociology dealing with the people who compose a community. A social institution is an ordered system of interrelated parts in a society. Structural functionalism all work in sync to make a society function. There are hidden and …show more content…

If symbolic interaction theorist did not label theses students as “trouble makers” or “disruptive”, then less students would be sent to out of school suspension or juvenile facilities. Structural functionalist would say that the students being disruptive help create jobs at juvenile faculties and jails. Also, because the schools have a zero tolerance protocol jobs are created for more law enforcement to be in schools. Students should not be punished differently because any of their attributes that make them an individual. Education is one of the most precious gifts and African-American, Latino, and Caucasian should all be given the same opportunity. As a community the zero tolerance law needs to be revised to be target more for safety rather than

Show More
Related

  • Fact Sheet: How Bad Is The School To Prison Pipeline?

    1503 Words  | 4 Pages

    If you did not know, the zero tolerance policy is when students break school behavior rules and strict regulations created by the district or school and get severe consequences for it. Carla Amurao, the author of the article, “Fact Sheet: How Bad Is the School-to-Prison Pipeline?”, stated that “statistics reflect that these policies disproportionately target students of color”. Students of color are being affected so badly by this policy, that statistics show black students are 3 times more likely to get expelled than white students. Since these students are being expelled or arrested for breaking zero tolerance policy rules, they are missing valuable information in classes due to court hearings. But, some people argue that the zero tolerance policy is unfair to all students, making the education system equal for all to succeed. For example, a “2007 study by the Advancement Project and the Power U Center for Social Change says that for every 100 students who were suspended, 15 were Black, 7.9 were American Indian, 6.8 were Latino and 4.8 were white”. As you can see, the zero tolerance policy affects all races, making them miss their education because of certain consequences. Because the mindset of these people is that, if the zero-tolerance policy does not affect just one race or group of people, then the education system

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of School To Prison Pipeline

    2270 Words  | 5 Pages

    The intent of this argumentative research paper, is to take a close look at school systems disciplinary policies and the effect they have on students. While most school systems in the nation have adopted the zero tolerance policies, there are major concerns that specific students could be targeted, and introduced into the criminal justice system based on these disciplinary policies. This research paper is intended to focus on the reform of zero tolerance policies, and minimizing the school to prison pipeline.

    Read More

  • Macro Level Theories In Sociology

    1262 Words  | 3 Pages

    Sociology is the study of society and the interactions that occur within society itself. There are numerous methods of analyzing societies and the way the function, nonetheless, most methods fall in micro and macro level theories. Micro level theories allow sociologist to study smaller relationships such as individual or compact groups of people. On the other hand, macro level studies permit for larger scale investigations to take place. With both of these theories there are three theoretical perspectives used in sociology. Micro level theories include symbolic interactionism which focuses in interactions done with language and gestures and the means which allow such interactions to take place. Macro level theories include structural functionalism

    Read More

  • Structural Functionalism Gangs

    747 Words  | 2 Pages

    Structural functionalism is a macro-level paradigm that wants to explain the social structural roles. Structural

    Read More

  • The Three Paradigms In Society

    826 Words  | 2 Pages

    are the three major paradigms that function in today’s society. Functionalist, and conflict paradigms are macro-sociological paradigms. Symbolic interaction is a micro-sociological paradigm. Functionalist paradigm focuses on the integration of society, while social conflict focuses on the issue of division among society. Symbolic interaction works on communication and social change as a consequence. The three paradigms are completely different from each other in a social point of view. The macro-sociological paradigms view America as an inequality state. The social conflict paradigm fits today’s society.

    Read More

  • Symbolic Interactionism Theory Of Gay Marriage

    878 Words  | 2 Pages

    The main points of the Symbolic Interactionism perspective is that symbols are what shape how we communicate and how we view the world. Our changing ideas affect how we understand and view different things around us. Without symbols society would be not be very coordinated, people wouldn’t be able to specify a specific time for school or where to meet for lunch. The main points of the Functional Analysis perspective, is that society is made up of several individual parts that work together for society to function properly. Each of these smaller parts has functions that are beneficial consequences of people actions and dysfunctions that are harmful and threaten the equilibrium. In this perspective the smaller parts are look at to see how they

    Read More

  • the school to prison pipeline

    1989 Words  | 4 Pages

    Another major reason why juveniles are ending up in the juvenile justice system is because many schools have incorporate the zero tolerance policy and other extreme school disciplinary rules. In response to violent incidents in schools, such as the Columbine High School massacre, school disciplinary policies have become increasingly grave. These policies have been enacted at the school, district and state levels with the hopes of ensuring the safety of students and educators. These policies all rely on the zero tolerance policy. While it is understandable that protecting children and teachers is a priority, it is not clear that these strict policies are succeeding in improving the safety in schools.

    Read More

  • Symbolic Interactionism: The Causes Of Homelessness In Today's Society

    758 Words  | 2 Pages

    Symbolic interactionism perspective is defined as “the study of how people negotiate the meanings of social life during their interactions with others” (Rohall, Milkie, and Lucas, 2014, p.27). It asserts that “we construct meaning about things that are important in our own lives and in our society” (Rohall, Milkie, and Lucas, 2014, p.28). These meanings derive from social interactions among individuals which

    Read More

  • Examples Of Symbolic Interactionism In Sociology

    995 Words  | 2 Pages

    Sociologists view society in different ways. Sociologists use three major theories: symbolic interactionism, functional analysis, and conflict theory. The symbolic interactionist perspective, also known as symbolic interactionism, directs sociologists to consider the symbols and details of everyday life, what these symbols mean, and how people interact with each other (Cliff). Some examples of symbolic interactionism are the meaning of marriage, the meaning of divorce, the meaning of parenthood, and the meaning of love. Symbols may include wedding bands, vows of life‐long commitment, a white bridal dress, a wedding cake, a Church ceremony, and flowers and music. American society attaches general meanings to these symbols, but individuals also maintain their own perceptions of what these and other symbols mean (Cliff). Symbols have a shared social meaning that is understood by all members of society. Symbolical interactionism is analyzed at a micro-sociological level. It examines small-scale patterns of social interaction. It focuses mainly on face-to-face interaction and how people use symbols to create a social life.

    Read More

  • Sociological Perspective On Teen Depression And Suicide

    716 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are three main types of sociological perspectives in which you can perceive different sociological issues and concepts; structural-functional, symbolic-interaction, and social conflict. Structural-functional looks at society as a whole and how it works together. Symbolic-interaction is how different symbols spark particular thoughts and emotions by examining the meanings that people impose on objects, events and behaviors. Social conflict studies how power and coercion affect social order. Based off these types of perspectives, an analysis on teen depression and suicide can be evaluated from a sociological standpoint.

    Read More

  • Structural Functionalism Research Paper

    579 Words  | 2 Pages

    Structural Functionalism or what I call just functionalism, is just another theory that has society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability. This approach looks at society through the macro-level of orientation, which is a broad focus on the social structures that shape society as a whole, and believes that society has evolved like organisms. This approach looks at both social structure and the social functions. Functionalism has society as a whole in terms of the function of its constituent elements; namely norms and customs, traditions, and institutions. There is a common analogy, popularized by Herbert Spencer that presents these parts of society as "organs" that works towards the proper functioning of the "body" as a whole. In the most basic terms, it simply emphasizes "the effort to impute and the rigorously as possible, to each feature, custom, or even practice the effect on the functioning of a supposedly stable and cohesive system.

    Read More

  • The Three Major Theoretical Perspectives in Sociology

    1966 Words  | 4 Pages

    Sociologists employ three major theoretical perspectives in sociology today. They are the structural-functionalist perspective, the conflict perspective, and the symbolic interactionism. The structural-functionalist perspective is done at a macro level and its focus is on the relationships between the parts of society. The Conflict perspective is done at a macro level and its main focus is on how the wealthy controls the poor and weak. Symbolic Interactionism is done at a micro and it focuses on the use of symbols and face to face interactions.

    Read More

  • Symbolic Interactionism

    1371 Words  | 3 Pages

    the interaction the individual itself and how they interact within their surroundings. Through symbolic interactionalism you look at things and what they mean, and then determine the effects they have. There are many hand signs, both good and bad, that people exchange, as well as facial expressions in reaction to an event or statement that a symbolic interactionalist would look at. My observation period in the library allowed me to glimpse into the life of a sociologist. I realized that you could learn a lot about someone by just watching him or her. Their behavior is highly representative of the person they are; yet one cannot assume what specific reactions imply. Through the use of your sociological imagination you are able to gain a deeper understanding of behavior and how behavior is influenced by society.

    Read More

  • Difference Between Structural Functionalism And Symbolic Interaction

    739 Words  | 2 Pages

    Symbolic interaction is microsociology that influences how we interact with other individuals. Structural functionalism is the macrosociology that influences how a community function in society through dysfunction. Symbolic interaction theorists would look at disproportionate school discipline incommensurable than structural functionalist.

    Read More

  • Family Inequality In The Family

    1515 Words  | 4 Pages

    Symbolic interactionism is the most social out of the three theories due to the fact that it is based upon the premise that society is made through the interactions individuals have with each other. The belief “that family reinforce and rejuvenate bonds through symbolic mechanism rituals such as family meals and holidays” is held by symbolic interactionism (Boundless). Everything any family member does is symbolic and affects the other family members in a positive or negative light and rituals or traditions held by the family only impacts the individual more. This brings forth the stereotype that parents control the fate of their children nonetheless. People emphasize the interactions parents have with their children over anyone else, as parents are the people that the child does see and is around most often in majority of

    Read More

More about Difference Between Structural Functionalism And Structural Interaction

Open Document