Difference Between Religion And Personal Religion Vs. Personal Faith

Such as rituals, beliefs, festivals, community, and many other things which are set by specific religion. Especially, when a group of people gets together based on their shared thoughts of their religion. Which shows their belonging into the groups, and they identify themselves as part of that group. Religion is really diverse, even in one religion, it would vary how the religion is understood and practiced by a person. For example, a person can “be a believer but not a religious practitioner” (Religion and Spirituality).

People believe that faith is what people have because they question the Bible. Faith is important because it affects everything people think say and do. Faith is the victory that overcomes the world. Faith is having the believe in God but not necessity having a religion faith is also is to believe to be a way that God talks to people. Faith important because.

In this sense, many people may not have even contemplated a religious experience, but may still lead a religious life. Each individual interprets the experience in the light of their own morality, culture and personal history- the form of the experience is contributed by the recipient himself. When we attempt to measure the truth (veracity) of religious experience, there are many problems which may arise, for example they are difficult to measure and usually only take place within the context of one’s own religion. They may also be due to the influences of drugs such as alcohol. Religious authority lies mainly in scripture but can trace their origins back to a key figure who can se... ... middle of paper ... ...sis of your religious life may be a mixture of both of these things.

Some religions believe in the supreme God, some believe in other gods, some do not believe in God or any other god. Religion is such a vast topic that instead of attempting to define the differing philosophies from each specific religion, the definition of religion should be left up to the individual. Instead of trying to limit what religion should be, instead allow each individual the limitless options to define how he or she sees religion. I personally define religion as one’s values and beliefs as predicated by one’s relationship or lack thereof with God, a god, or an entity higher than one’s self. Christians have values and beliefs based on their relationship... ... middle of paper ... ...framework for my opinion that humans are naturally cooperative and good.

This then takes us back to the notion that religious experiences are shadowed by ones culture/ tradition and therefore human rather than divinely centred. To conclude, I believe claiming a religious experience as a proof for the existence of god creates more questions and problems than it seeks to answer. Furthermore, sceptics may state that the fact one claims to have had a religious experience does not mean that god exists. Just because a person believes god is there (epistemology) does not mean that God is actually there (ontology). You need something more than the 'feeling' of religious experience for the verification of this.

Simply put, believing you are the only right church, but that everyone is right too (131). Second, inclusivists tend to believe in God, social shoppers on the other hand often believe in a higher power. Often this is taken for granted, that God is a God, and not a general power like some religions believe. This is often reconciled by inclusivists with the expression that God is love, and that it is, in fact, impossible to separate anyone from God (143). Often being an inclusivist means viewing and interpreting religions through their own religion.

I believe the phrase, "deep down," can be a term often misused by a person who doesn 't understand the teachings or indifferent to religion in general. I wouldn 't judge anyone who thinks all religions are the same but rather enlighten them. Let them know that there 's more to it and guide them in a path of success not necessarily to a specific religion. I feel more comfortable having a conversation about religion more now than before. Usually this is a topic I wouldn 't discuss with others unless it 's about my own religion, just in avoidance of an awkward

Not all people practicing a religion would agree that they depend on their religion to complete them as a whole. Yes this would be true of most religions but not of all religions. That is why I find it erroneous when it is being used to define a word that has many more options for words of choice than referring to it as being necessary for wholeness, when some people see their religious practices as daily stress reducers and not as completing them as individuals. I believe the feeling of completion in your life is a personal view and to whom that person shares an identity with. This would include close family and religious family.

The sense of community in religion shows that they have one faith, and that they find support not only with each other, but also in that they worship. These different perspectives on religion, compared to my original definition, show me that there are so many intricate components of religion. Albanese also describes religion as a “system.” This word

Emile Durkheim defined religion as having a few necessary components, which are that it is a unified structure of beliefs with organized practices that is built around beliefs which are sacred to its followers. He also said that in each religion they divided items, places, and events into two realms, being Sacred and Profane. The sacred elements are connected to the religion, and are items that inspire awe, respect, and even sometimes fear into the believer of that religion. If people wish to become part of the sacred realm they perform some sort of ritual such as praying or sacrificing. Since people have faith they start to accept the things in which they do not understand or things that cannot be explained.