Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
gender roles in western culture
gender roles and how they have changed over time
gender roles in society today
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: gender roles in western culture
Masculinity vs Femininity:
Masculinity reflect that power distribution between men and women in organization. Today 21 century still some country has not given same authority to women what men have in corporate. So that men always dominant to women. A high score (men 's) in this activity demonstrates that the overall population will be pushed by the achievement, the acknowledgment and fulfillment, with execution portrayed by the victor / best in the field –its starting from the school and proceeds along the climate of organization. If low score (female) in the scale implies that always dealing with other individuals caring and personal satisfaction and give value them. The analysis on gender basis it’s viewed that Germany has scored 66 male work in organization. It means male has more power, assertiveness and achievement compare to female in
…show more content…
(world travel guide, n.d.)
Working style difference Both Malaysia and Germany, the management style are all most same, they are follow in hierarchical manners. The senior employee treat to subordinate to give respect every person not only work place but also in society. They are very punctual about timing in organization. They don’t give equal power distribution to employee. (World Business Culture, n.d.)
Food problem German people are having totally different food dishes from Kiwi person. Kiwi people are dependent on bread or burger and non-veg. whereas German culture people more depend on non-veg. German food guideline, Pork is the most devoured meat. Like: Schweinshaxe (braised pork hawk) and Saumagen (pork stomach) whereas kiwi people are not much more prefer this meat. (German Culture: Facts, Customs and Traditions, n.d.)
behaviors, and social conditions that we call masculinities are “hard-wired” into males through biology (see Thorhill & Palmer, 2000) and/or the heritability of human psyche (see Jung, 1959/1989; Bly, 1990). They view masculinity as static, transhistorical, cross-cultural, and cross-situational. From this perspective, gender change is either impossible, or it involves the use of powerful force to constrain what is seen as “naturally” male. (Masculine Self pg. 19)
In one of our class discussions on hegemonic masculinity, we attempted to define a general list of characteristics or behaviors that one should have in order to attain this ideal. However, there was no consensus on these qualities. Frequently, the qualities that we would suggest would be those that were the opposite of qualities associated with women. For example, if we would categorize being emotional as a trait assigned to women, we would assign the trait of being impassive to men. This would also occur when we considered which behaviors would be considered masculine. While we assumed women would perform work inside of the house, we assigned men to work outside of the house, doing activities such as maintaining the yard or fixing the car. Most of, if not all of, the qualities and behaviors we assigned as being a part of hegemonic masculinity perpetuated the idea of gender inequality. When we assumed that those characteristics would be considered aspects of hegemonic masculinity, we restricted them to only being assigned to men because if a woman could possess those characteristics, it wouldn’t be considered a masculine aspect. This also explains how hegemonic masculinity can perpetuate
...le. Overall, the author identifies with the overall context of the article which is clearly directed towards pointing out how natural selection has provided women with the rightful capacity to become good leaders. However, this fact should not shun the idea that above women, men were expected to serve as the head of the household. This principle could be applied even in organizations today. Men have the talent to direct, however women tend to become more understanding and more reasonable at times. In this case, the work of men and women in an organization as leaders provide the best source of foundation for a better working system that employees could follow through in relation to how they complete their tasks as expected.
The genre of analyzation in this paper is masculinity. More in depth, the societal perpetuation of the concept of masculinity and its effects on individuals. Masculinity is a concept defined as a category of attributes, social behaviors and roles generally associated only with individuals of the male sex. It is rarely associated with females unless they are butch lesbian, and even if they are not, society will portray them as so. The concept of masculinity is a social construct – most often seen in patriarchal cultures and societies and identified mainly with gender roles. Gender roles are the acceptable or appropriate societal norms dictating
In the article, "Becoming Member of Society: Learning the Social Meanings of Gender" by Aaron H. Devor, Devor discusses how gender is formed in society. Normally, femaleness and maleness appear to be "natural," instead of something caused by socialization. Although, in this article, Devor finds that while there are obviously biological reason behind why one chooses the gender they choose, there are also social factors that play part in how maleness and femaleness are created. Throughout this article, Devor discusses what defines one as a male, and one as a female. Devor also touched briefly on how the two genders intertwine together to create a sort of communion. Devor should have further went into how male characteristics and female characteristics can be seen as having a yin and yang relationship.
There have been many scholars who have pondered the question of what masculinity really is and how do we define it as a society. Often the question is gender something we really do, do we each shape the course for ourselves or are we molded into a predominate shape? To even begin the long debate to answer questions such as these, one needs to look at the individual role and at the role that institutions have on us.
● How do boys learn to be men? How significant is the role of fathers (and other men) in the upbringing of boys?
15). I couldn’t have said this better myself; I do not see why a male and a female have the same level of educational degrees and work experience should be treated differently because of natural physical attributes and gender identity. Shah (2015), argues that “in the present competitive world, though amplified workload and working hours are experienced by both men and women, in this study women were found to experience more workload and work schedule issues in comparison to men” (p. 14). Kanter said “Not only are the decision makers influenced by the stereo types that disadvantage women in the leadership role, but also they may succumb to homosocial reproduction, a tendency for a group to reproduce itself in its own image” (as cited in Northouse, 2016, p. 405). Females are pioneers, multitasking is one of their many great qualities, even under pressure, “studies shown that women experience more role stress than men” (Shah, 2015, p. 14). Yes, it is clear to see that some jobs require men specialty because of their physical attributes such as strength; it is an approving and desirable qualities; however, when it a leadership styles and skills is in the environment that in mainly about ideas, human skills, communication and anything outside busting a muscle or
A young boy is walking home from the bus stop after school. Suddenly three boys run up to him from behind and tackle him to the ground and throw his diorama away from him. When the boy gets home his parents ask why his diorama is beat up. He doesn’t want to tell his parents what happened, because being picked on, showing large amounts of emotion, and telling is a weak thing to do. The parents eventually do hear the story and confront one of the bully’s parents the next day about what happened, the bully’s parents reply, “Well boys will be boys”. The story that just been told is an example of the major problems with todays society’s view on masculinity: being weak is bad, violent behavior is acceptable because it is natural, and it is acceptable for males to show excessive amounts of aggression. The story shows three issues, but there are others. The idea of
Gender stereotyping is when beliefs concerning the characteristics of both women and men that contain both good and bad traits. Gender stereotyping affects both men and women but usually targets the woman more harshly (Cooks & Cusack, 2011, p.1). Gender is something that is very unique and a very interesting topic. “It has obvious links to the real world, first in the connection between many grammatical gender systems and biological size, which underpin particular gender systems and also have external correlates”(Corbett, 2013). For an example gender-based violence against women is widely recognized as a critical concern for women in all part of the world (Cooks & Cusack, 2011, p.28). Now day’s women are underrepresented in the business world today, 16 percent of corporate officers in the U.S are women and 1 percent of all of the CEO positions in the Fortune 500 companies (Baron & Branscombe, 2012). In the workplace there are glass ceilings that are barriers based off of attitudinal and organizational bias that prevent qualified women from making it to the supervisory positions. As time elapsed that generation of women like that no longer existed. Women starting taking job positions and having supervisory positions in the workplace. It was no longer the thing that women would not work when they got older. Males also have a stereotype of being strong and being the head of the household in a family. “Masculine gender markers
The concept of gender in relation to the division of labor in the workplace, and in relation to issues of power and control is an unfortunate, groundless stereotype. Suzanne Tallichet notes that the gendered division of workplace labor is rooted in flawed ideology of innate sex differences in traits and abilities, and operates through various control mechanisms. (Tallichet 1995: 698) These control mechanisms are primarily exercised by men over women and serve to exaggerate differences between the sexes, especially surrounding women’s presumed incapability for doing male identified work.
It represents the distribution of emotional roles between the genders. Masculine cultures are valued as competitiveness, assertiveness, materialism, ambition and power. In contrast, femininity cultures are inclined to relationships and quality of life. Masculinity culture is more obvious in larger organization as the management is more decisive and aggressive, thus, it shows a relatively lower share of working women in professional jobs. In femininity organization, the employees work in order to live and prefer leisure time than money. The resolution of conflict in masculinity is letting the strongest win but in femininity, the employees solve conflict in a harmonious way by compromising and
Women managers’ perceptions of the successful manager are only slightly less conclusive. Unlike the women managers in the 1970s and 1980s not all female managers today sextype the successful manager as male; however, no one, male or female, ever identifies the successful manager as feminine. Male, and only to a slightly lesser extent, female, managers continue to describe successful managers as possessing masculine traits, such as self-confidence, competitiveness, decisiveness, aggressiveness and independence.
Masculinity and femininity are two terms, which have been interpreted differently throughout history. Both the males and the females have responsibilities and duties but these duties differ based on one’s gender. Gender has played a prodigious role in the economy, politics, and the society. Everyone starts making interpretations of the strengths and weaknesses based on one’s gender. These interpretations are not always based on his or her ability but is usually based on his or her gender. Males tend to be judged as extremely strong and unfashionable in terms of appearance. Whereas, females are judged as expensive and very fashionable. Males and females both differ in their abilities and their enjoyments. Fashion, entertainment, and strength are three topics, which are used to define masculinity and femininity in the 21st century.
Since men and women work closely in the workplace today, there are many complaints addressing the differences in the genders. Simma Lieberman addresses these differences in her article, “Better Communication Between Men and Women in the Workplace: Some Useful Tips”. Men tend to think that women take things too seriously, are slow in getting down to business, and try to be “one of the boys”. A complaint that women give about men is that they are being labeled names such as: “girls”, “honey”, and “darlin”. Other complaints are that men make women into objects, making decisions about work with other men and not including the women, and using expressions that only use sports, violence or sexual connotations s...