Difference Between Aristotle And Hylomorphism

861 Words4 Pages
Aristotle 's Anthropic Hylomorphism and his logical Hylomorphism: Presented by Aristotle, Hylomorphism is a philosophical theory which examines the substance into matter and form. Generally, Hylomorphism is the philosophical theory mainly developed by Aristotle which is a form of reification which analyzes the substance onto matter and form. Before explaining the relation between Anthropic Hylomorphism and his logical Hylomorphism it is important first to define the term. The term of Hylomorphism has been extensively used with the technical terminology in the work of Aristotle. It is a conceptual framework which literally under lies all of his mature theories and philosophical work. The two notions which are fundamental features of this term or concept are the matter and form which have been developed in the form of a general; theory of causation and explanation which can easily be seen on the mature philosophical work of Aristotle. The Logical Hylomorphism is based on a logic which is formal description of a traditional account of what is distinguishing features about logic. The very distinction between the formal and material aspect of all the arguments has been…show more content…
In simple words, this definition is related to the definition of truth with reference to the fact that truth is correspondence to a fact. According to this definition of truth, it is the relational property which includes the characteristic relation and to some portion of reality. In general terms, the in correspondence theory, the truth or falsity of a statement has been determined by the relationship or interaction to the part of the world and this idea was originally presented or introduced in the era of

    More about Difference Between Aristotle And Hylomorphism

      Open Document