Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
the strenghts of administrative theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: the strenghts of administrative theory
Another example of classical theory is administrative principles. Even though scientific management and administrative theories fall under the same category, both of them are very different. Administrative theory is identified to have five general rules used in today’s modern society such as foresight, organisational, command, coordinate and control (Schermerhorn et al. 2014). Mary Parker Follet is well known for her contribution she made towards administrative approach her ideas included things like freedom of speech living in a diverse community, equality for all workers, resolve conflict situations and no dominated authority required (Schermerhorn et al. 2014). Dynamic Administration is an enhanced version of the principles used by modern managers where Mary illustrates the power and ability gained when …show more content…
Whereas, comparing it to scientific management the theory it would not help attract customers. Although administrative principle is a very objective it is still considered to be useful to the modern managers to work in a modern society. It is absolutely critical to take into consideration that administration highly depends on the individual person. For instant, young person can complete a task quicker than someone who has aged. Modern manager’s focus on more aspects and functions that are crucial for the company as it helps keep the customers and workers closer together. This reinforces the same idea that administrative is useful to modern managers but it’s subjective and varies.
One of the other approaches that are proved to be useful for modern management is the contingency approach. This applies to all the management conditions in a diverse environment. This approach normally does not have one particular system to help manage the
Working at a large healthcare organization, it is important that managers are aware of the different management styles. This will help in becoming effective leaders. The theory I have identified in my organizations Situational Theory. Situational leadership
This approach concerns only on the practical situations and circumstances and believes it to be the best way of managing. It requires vast knowledge on situational variables and external factors. The structure of organization must match the demand of its environment and technology. The leadership styles must be appropriately adopted according to the situational demands. It is mainly complex and has difficulty in empirical testing. It is termed as reactive rather than proactive.
Theory X can be used to map other management concepts but alone the theory X stands nothing
There are different management concepts. They are scientific management theory, general administrative management theory and behavioural management theory.
Management as a science focuses on specific best practices for management. Classical management is known as the oldest form of management and it focuses on making an organization more efficient. Maybank is using administrative management which is one of the classical management to manage the whole organization rather than individual employees. Henri Fayol was the frontier in administrative management and it contains 14 principles
The classical school of organization theory dominated administrations from the early 1900’s well into the 1930’s, and it is still relevant today in many of the contemporary organization theories. Shafritz states that classical organization theory was the first theory of its kind, and serves as the foundation of other schools organization theory (Shafritz, Ott, & Jang, 2011, p. 32). Classical organization theory includes scientific management approach, bureaucratic approach, and administrative management approach. Several major theorists of classical organization were Adam Smith, Frederick Taylor, Max Weber, Henri Fayol, and Luther Gulick.
Clear and formal definition of procedures is an essential dimension of classical management. This essential aspect of classical management originated from Taylor’s methods and his foundation of scientific management. It recognises that specialisation maximises the efficiency of a worker. This essential dimension of classical management has influenced the efficiency of the manufacture of goods in large factories, such as Mitsubishi Australia, and the effects of this methodology can be seen throughout the industrial revolution. Specialisation creates a mechanistic structure to an organisation and is a method of scientific management that hasn’t changed much from when it first began.
An organisation’s management is based on theories developed by researchers that study what managers do and what instituted good management practice. This has led to the formation of a new perspective on management that is called general administrative theory. The theory we are focusing on was developed by a German sociologist named Max Weber. According to him, bureaucracy is the most efficient method of organisation. What is bureaucracy? It is a form of organisation categorised by division of labour, comprehensive rules and regulations, a well-defined hierarchy and objective based relationships. In the early 1900s Max Weber’s bureaucratic theory was spread throughout public and private sectors although it was largely discredited by organisations around the world.
Administrative principles look more at the organization, or department as a whole and not focus on individual employees or functions of the organization. Fayol, Gulick, and Urwick, among others, started creating principles for “organizing different tasks into jobs, jobs into work units, and work units into departments” (Liebler & McConnell, 2012). Fayol broke away from Gulick and Urwick and created his own fourteen management principles, which were pertinent to all types of organizations and consisted of “Division and specialization of work, Authority, Discipline, Unity of command, Unity of direction, Placing group interests above individual interests, Pay, Centralization, Line of authority or scalar chain, Order, Equity, Stability
Administrative management is the responsibility of management and is responsible for maintaining a high standard of internal control. Management is responsible for performance of duties of staff as part of a control environment. They are also responsible for assuring that the other major areas of internal control principles are
Compare and contrast the management theories of Frederick Taylor, Henri Fayol, Elton Mayo and Douglas McGregor. In what sense(s) are these theories similar and/or compatible? In what sense(s) are these theories dissimilar and/or incompatible? How would a contingency theorist reconcile the points of dissimilarity and/or incompatibility between these approaches?
Today’s era of business world adapts to everything new but these modern concepts are an indirect tribute to the theories produced by Taylor, Fayol, Mayo and Weber. Taylor’s Scientific management theory is one such example which has become such an important aspects of modern management that it feels unbelievable that his concepts were a part of the history. It is falsely assumed that as the society progresses, the older theories tend to lose their importance. The thing to be noted here is that these theories are based on basic human needs which do not change with time; the thing that changes is the method to fulfil those needs. Investigating earlier management theories is important because these theories are less complex and provide immediate solution to the problems. These theories basically help us to go to the root of the problem and understand its complexity. The better understanding we have about the problem, the easier it is to accomplish the objectives of the company. The following essay states the importance of the Taylor’s Scientific management theory and how it is implemented even today in the business world.
There are three well-established theories of classical management: Taylor?s Theory of Scientific Management, Fayol?s Administrative Theory, Weber?s Theory of Bureaucracy. Although these schools, or theories, developed historical sequence, later ideas have not replaced earlier ones. Instead, each new school has tended to complement or coexist with previous ones.
There are several theories that examine an organization and it’s approach to managing work in an effort to develop efficiency and increase production. Two classical approaches to management are Taylor’s scientific management theory and Weber's bureaucratic management theory. Both men are considered pioneers of in the study of management.
The evolution of management though the decades can be divided into two major sections. One of the sections is the classical approach. Under the classical approach efficiency and productivity became a critical concern of the managers at the turn of the 20th century. One of the approaches from the classical time period were systematic management which placed more emphasis on internal operations because managers were concerned with meeting the growth in demand brought on by the Industrial revolution. As a result managers became more concerned with physical things than towards the people therefore systematic management failed to lead to production efficiency. This became apparent to an engineer named Frederick Taylor who was the father of Scientific Management. Scientific Management was identified by four principles for which management should develop the best way to do a job, determine the optimum work pace, train people to do the job properly, and reward successful performance by using an incentive pay system. Scientifi...