Difference Between Administrative And Administrative Theory

917 Words2 Pages

Another example of classical theory is administrative principles. Even though scientific management and administrative theories fall under the same category, both of them are very different. Administrative theory is identified to have five general rules used in today’s modern society such as foresight, organisational, command, coordinate and control (Schermerhorn et al. 2014). Mary Parker Follet is well known for her contribution she made towards administrative approach her ideas included things like freedom of speech living in a diverse community, equality for all workers, resolve conflict situations and no dominated authority required (Schermerhorn et al. 2014). Dynamic Administration is an enhanced version of the principles used by modern managers where Mary illustrates the power and ability gained when …show more content…

Whereas, comparing it to scientific management the theory it would not help attract customers. Although administrative principle is a very objective it is still considered to be useful to the modern managers to work in a modern society. It is absolutely critical to take into consideration that administration highly depends on the individual person. For instant, young person can complete a task quicker than someone who has aged. Modern manager’s focus on more aspects and functions that are crucial for the company as it helps keep the customers and workers closer together. This reinforces the same idea that administrative is useful to modern managers but it’s subjective and varies.
One of the other approaches that are proved to be useful for modern management is the contingency approach. This applies to all the management conditions in a diverse environment. This approach normally does not have one particular system to help manage the

Open Document