Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
robin hood, the hero
the tale of robin hood
robin hood summury in easy words
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: robin hood, the hero
Did he really exist? It is difficult to answer whether or not Robin Hood really existed as over time the story of Robin Hood has been changed, but most sources say that he did exist around the time of King Richard the Lionheart. The story of Robin Hood is more of an invented character than a real person. Robin Hood probably was not even his real name as criminals and thieves were sometimes called something along the lines of Robin Hood as a nickname. Who was he or who was he supposed to have been? Robin Hood was a supposed philanthropist who gave money or support to the poor and less fortunate and stole from the wealthy. Most interpretations of Robin Hood claim he lived around the same time as King Richard the Lionheart. It is said that …show more content…
Why did such an individual ‘arise’ at this time? OR Why was there a need for such a hero at this point in time? When Robin Hood is first mentioned in history it is around the time of Richard the Lionheart who, instead of being king, was off fighting the crusades and left Prince John to rule. Prince John and the Sheriff of Nottingham (a supposedly distant relative) are told to have taxed the poor until they had nothing left. The most common story of Robin Hood tells that he appeared at this time and stole from the wealthy to give to the poor. It would seem more appropriate to assume he stole from the government and gave to the taxpayers. This is probably why the story of Robin Hood is suggested to have happened at this time, but other research and findings state that Robin hood and his merry men were a type of loan shark who loaned money to those in need to then have it repaid with interest. If this theory were true it would mean Robin Hood and his gang arose at this time because they saw an opportunity to take advantage of the poor and also steal from the …show more content…
It seems more probable that Robin Hood and his gang loaned money to people to then receive interest and make a profit. Was he really the folk hero that we are led to believe or not? The movie ‘Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves’ is a representation of Robin Hood that goes by the popular belief that he stole from the rich to give to the poor. This does contradict the previous discussion. Although there is no strong evidence supporting the idea Robin Hood was not as great as we are lead to believe or that he helped the poor, it seems more logical to believe that the outlaw did not help the poor for his own benefit. In the film Robin meets John Little and his group of outlaws and eventually leads them to rebel against the Sheriff of Nottingham and also helps them build a community in the forest. This idea makes him seem like a hero because if he was not he possibly would not have done this. Filmmakers do make changes to stories to make them into good movies, but it would have been to much of a drastic change if the story of Robin Hood was not as heroic as it
Bush, Michael. ‘Up for the Commonwealth’: the significance of tax grievances in the English rebellions of 1536, English Historical Review 106 (1991).
Batman, Robin , and Alfred the butler are all in the quest movie The Dark Knight Rises. Batman is the quest hero, Robin is the helper/guide, and alfred is the wise old man who gives advice. This quest story has a lot in common as the book True Grit by Charles Portis. In the quest novel Mattie Ross fits the description of the quest hero. Reuben (Rooster) Cogburn fits the wise old man because he acts as a fatherly figure towards Mattie Ross, and knows the gang that Tom Chaney (the villain) is with. LaBoeuf fits the helper guide because he is Helping to catch the murderer Tom Chaney.
Money was tough for people to come by. As Dobie says, “Money sure can buy nice stuff can’t it? Boy, if you had the dough you sure could fix up a swell house. (Bell, 309) Money could do so much for person. Often times there was not enough money to buy meat or pay the bills. Money would come in on paydays and often that would be the only day when the family had money. Like when Francka sar...
During the Stuarts, the only people who had the liquid cash to pay for the needs of the modern government were primarily the middle-class and gentry, which were represented by the parliament. The “awkward, hand-to-mouth expedients” (38) of the Stuarts agitated by the differences in expectations of governance, brought them into conflict with their primary tax base. The impatience of the eventual rebels was exacerbated by their Stuart’s disregard for the traditional balance between the crown and the parliament, as they were Scottish royals who had only dealt with a very weak
When people think about heros it is a person in a cape flying into burning buildings to save people or fighting a villain to save the world. According to Oxford Dictionary a hero is a person who is admired for their courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities. This shows how just normal people can be qualified as heros. A book that exemplifies this is To Kill A Mockingbird because it is filled with people that went out of their way to help others or the society as a whole. A person who did this in particular was Atticus Finch. Atticus Finch was a hero because he fell under the definition and was admired for his courage, achievements, and noble qualities.
Typically a hero is seen wearing tights, or working in secret, but in reality heroes are ordinary people doing extraordinary acts. A hero is someone who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements or noble qualities. In Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird”, Atticus Finch is a true hero. Atticus is definitely a hero as proven by his morality, his courage and finally his abilities as well as intelligence.
This statement is true, but the money that sustained the philanthropic ways of the Industrialists was obtained in a way exemplify the qualities of a Robber Baron. A list of Rockefeller's major donations added up to about $500,000,000. While this money went charities and hospitals, the money was made from unethical business practices and the undermining of employees. The Saturday Globe’s political cartoon of Carnegie shows him cutting wages and giving away libraries and money. Industrialists took money that went from their workers away to practice philanthropy. The money might have gone to great causes, but the way it was obtained is characteristic of Robber Barons. Andrew Carnegie's essay, “The Gospel of Wealth” he describes the role of the wealthy in the community. Carnegie class the millionaire a “trust for the poor” and states that the wealthy know how to best invest n the community. This role taken on by Carnegie and other wealthy Americans of the late 19th century is reminiscent of that of an oligarchy, where a small group has control of the community. The oligarchical position of the wealthy in Carnegie's essay is against the American values of freedom and individuality, and very discriminatory towards the
Life was handed to those who had money, they lived with the thought that money
Ideas abound of what true heroism is in this day and age. To some, a true hero may be the person that led their favorite sports team to a championship. To others, true heroes are the doctors that helped a loved one get better from a serious illness. Some even see the person that gives them inspiration on a day to day basis as a true hero. To many, however, a true hero is so much more than that. To many, a true hero is the one that goes the extra mile t follow a strict moral code, both at home and in the public eye. A true hero is the one who will stand up for what he or she believes and what is right, no matter what the consequences may be. A true hero gives hope for humanity to the masses. Atticus Finch, from Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mockingbird is one who possesses all of those attributes of heroism and more.
In Myne Owne Ground, Breen and Innes write about being a “tithable”. A tithable is “someone obliged to pay taxes”. In 1645, an act regarding tithables stated,
In conclusion, it is impossible, as far as our knowledge goes, to know for certain if Robin Hood was an actual person, based on an actual person, or was merely legend. There is strong evidence that Robin Hood was based on an actual person and there are many possible candidates for the real-life Robin Hood, but there is no definite evidence for any of them. The true identity of the legendary Robin Hood may one day be known if more evidence presents itself.
The love of money is the root of all evil, a statement that has proved itself true through the centuries. Loving money traps us, as human beings. It is not a bad thing to enjoy what money can do; however, the love of money is a wasted effort that can put all in grave peril. It is at our advantage that we have the ability to choose whether we ‘want’ to fall into that trap. Unfortunately, that choice is difficult since society associates one’s character with wealth and financial management. The mishaps, deaths, and hardships that occur from the beginning of the tale are the result of deliberate deception for personal gain. In Treasure Island, greed sends the characters on a voyage. Robert Louis Stevenson makes a social commentary on the role that money has come to play in our society.
The greatest question many have sought to answer is the creation vs. evolution debate. How did we get here? Were we created or did we evolve randomly? Are we the product of purposeful intelligence or are we the result of countless mistakes? Does it even matter? The story of money is similar to the story of humanity. Was money created or did it evolve. If it was created we can assume it will die. If money evolved then we can assume the future is unknown. In his book, The Ascent of Money a financial history of the world, Neil Ferguson historic analysis of money answers many of these questions. Ferguson believes money essentially mirrors mankind, magnifying back to us our progress, failures, values and weaknesses.” (The Ascent of Money, 358) The history of money shares many similarities to the history of man; Ferguson parallels between finance and Darwinism, illustrating the natural mechanism of our financial ecosystem that evolves, creates, competes, and dies.
"The Merry Men -- A Beginner's Guide to Robin Hood." The Merry Men -- A Beginner's Guide to Robin Hood. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Apr. 2014. .
Bruce Wayne was a poor kid from a poor city. His family was killed and he decides to fight crime, similar to Spider Man. Only Batman, some how got extremely rich to own his own cave, custom Bat Mobile, and have some sweet gadgets. I don’t know a lot about Batman, but I know enough that money doesn’t grow on trees. Besides, even if he did get the money reasonably, there would be other flaws. For example, there is no way he built his car him self. He had to have had a body shop customize it. And if this were the case, it wouldn’t be too hard for Joker or someone to find out...