Social Device: Social Constructionism And Social Deviance

976 Words2 Pages

Deviance; when people hear the term, usually constitutes images of criminal behaviour and other such negative notions. However, deviance, defined in Elements of Sociology, simply means to “stray from the norm or the usual” (Steckley and Letts 2013:143). But what are norms, who sets them and how does one stray away with it? While there are numerous amounts of theory in regards to social deviance, I have chosen a select few under the concept of social constructionism. Although deviance is not necessarily wrong in itself, using social constructionism, labelling theory, and primary deviance, demonstrates the adverse effects within an individual once internalized with an image as a deviant. Deviance basically comes down to how we define the norm. Norms can be seen as the rules or standard of behaviours that is expected within a society; it often varies in different cultures and groups. The norms of a society are usually set by the dominant culture. This, in short, means that deviance is socially constructed. The rules set for a given society is determined by the privileged and powerful, meaning that anything that ‘deviates’ from their path is to be considered as “bad”. Social constructionism is the idea that many elements such as gender, race, and other …show more content…

Just the mention of the word “deviance” fills many with the thought of negative connotations. However, the term itself does not have anything necessarily wrong with it; the term is used when something strays from the norm. It is because of the constant labelling and stereotyping that give the image of criminal behaviour when they hear the term deviance or see a person when they are considered a deviant. Regardless of the severity of the act, once caught in the web of societal judgement, an individual might trigger a domino effect that causes them to go deeper and deeper, to the point of actually being

Open Document