Designer Babies Research Papers

994 Words2 Pages

Designer Babies
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, a designer baby is "a baby whose genetic makeup has been artificially selected by genetic engineering combined with in vitro fertilization to ensure the presence or absence of particular genes or characteristics." (Thadani 2). Technology such as in vitro fertilization, prenatal testing, and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis allows for the development of a designer baby. Parents of a yet unborn child should have the right to choose specific traits of their offspring.
Aldous Huxley envisioned a future in which natural reproduction in mankind would be eliminated due to advances in fertility technology in his 1932 novel, Brave New World. He believed expecting parents would decide in advance their child's physical appearance as well as his or her mental abilities, including height, eye color, hair color, and gender. According to Huxley, embryos could be genetically altered to meet their requests. Though this may seem unreal and unlikely, some scientists claim the technology will be available to do this very soon("Designer Babies" 1). "In the next several decades, new biotechnology may allow parents to create 'built-to-order' babies by manipulating genetic material" (Smith 1).
In the present, the only way to choose specific traits in humans is through embryos created through in vitro fertilization or IVF. The term "in vitro" is Latin for "within the glass," causing most babies conceived through IVF to carry the name "test tube babies." In reality, though, fertilization occurs in petri dishes and the babies form inside the mother's womb (Bliss 12-13).
The main component of the designer baby process is pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, or PGD. This method is used to scree...

... middle of paper ...

...ineering Should Be Allowed." Genetic Engineering. Ed. Noël Merino. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2013. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Building Baby from the Genes Up." Washington Post. 13 Apr. 2008. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Discus. 27 Mar. 2014.
"Screening Creates Disease Free Baby." Medicine, Health, and Bioethics: Essential Primary Sources. Ed. K. Lee Lerner and Brenda Wilmoth Lerner. Detroit: GAle, 2006. 477-479. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Discus. 27 Mar. 2014.
Smith, Heather J. "Customized Kids May Be The Wave of The Future." Science & Theology News 5.10 (2005): 34. Science Reference Center. Discus. 31 Mar. 2014.
Thadani, Rahul. "The Public Should Oppose Designer Baby Technology." Designer Babies. Ed. Clayton Farris Naff. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2013. At Issue. Rpt. from "Designer Babies Debate." 2011. Opposing Viewpoints. Discus. 24 Mar. 2014.

Open Document