In 1995, Gideon Toury published Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond -- a book that reassessed the polysystem approach disliked by some scholars for its over-emphasis on the target system. Toury (1995) maintains that since a translation is designed primarily to fill a need in the target culture, it is logical to make the target system the object of study. Lefevere (1992) has studied translation and its influences on culture and emphasized that translation is not just a window opened to another world, or some such pious platitude; rather, translation is “a channel opened, often not without a certain reluctance, through which foreign influences can penetrate the native culture, challenge it, and even contribute to subverting it” (p. …show more content…
Central to polysystem theory was an emphasis on the poetics of the target culture. It was suggested that it should be possible to predict the conditions under which translations might occur and to predict also what kind of strategies translators might employ. Snell-Hornby (1988) points to translation system within the polysystem and writes that in this theory literary translation is seen as one of the elements participating in the constant struggle for survival and domination. It is emphasized that translations play a primary, creative and innovative role within the literary system. Hence, in this approach, translation is seen essentially as a text-type in its own right, as an integral part of the target culture and not merely as a reproduction of another text (p. …show more content…
And since in translated novels, translators are affected by the original texts, there might be some similarities and differences in stylistic diction of translated and non-translated novels.
2. Theoretical Framework
Systemic Functional Grammar looks at language in terms of form and meaning but pays very close attention to the linguistic level at which the analysis takes place. It then integrates subanalyses into a semiotic system. Readers and addressees need to be reassured that they are following the development of the text. Many texts are signposted by placing elements from the Rheme of one clause into the Theme of the next, or by repeating meanings from the Theme of one clause in the Theme of subsequent clauses. Thematic progression, as understood by Danes (1974), is the study of how Theme in a text is developed from clause to clause to build larger stretches. Danes (1974) presents three models of Thematic Progression (TP): Simple linear TP, TP with a continuous (constant) theme, and TP with derived themes. So thematic progression was considered the main theoretical framework of the study and the analysis was based on thematic progression of each
Reading literary texts from different cultures such as the Mesoamerican natives versus the European explorers can revolutionize a profound understanding. This understanding teaches readers how misinterpretation of language can occur between different groups of people because of different cultural perspectives. Therefore, to illustrate an accurate picture of language barriers between these cultures the reader must analyze two separate texts.
Translation is a linguistic science, but it occurs within a theological and moral framework. The issue is a sensitive one, as theology involves an obligation to the text and morality involves an obligation to the
This study aims to shed light on the reason behind these alterations, additions, and omissions occurred in the process of inter-semiotic translation. To that end, the study reveals the role of deconstruction, presented by Jacques Derrida, in this process. Therefore, the study attempts to explore the influences on the aforementioned adaptation exerted by deconstruction in order to rationalize the discrepancies between the ST and TT.
... of language and education is the most important in this story and society. The make use of two different languages in a narrative, provides a reader a perplexing yet fascinating image of characterization and customs. Multilingual story telling pushes the reader to decelerate and acquire supplemental focus on the expressions which are in the small fragments, however as soon as the reader has figured out the foreign words, he or she acquires a priceless picture of the theme of this story. The panorama of native words and phrases, cultural perceptions, and class dispute taken from the incorporation of two different languages are helpful for the reader to obtain significance that he or she couldn't gain if exclusively one language was employed in the story. Just as the power of language is applied to unveil a society, a better comprehension is provided to the reader.
She shows the way linguistics shift personal ways involving thoughts plus beliefs getting manifested. Knowledge involving many languages serves to complicate ideas on what is real: “To make my waking life American-normal, I turn on the lights before [something] untoward [shows itself]. I push the deformed into my dreams…in Chinese, the language of impossible stories. Before we can leave our parents, they stuff our heads [the same way they stuff] the suitcases which they [cram] with homemade underwear” (Kingston 87).
In conclusion we can agree that the use of both foreignization and domestication should be used when translating a text and/or movie. We can see that the successful use of mashing both techniques can lead to an accurate translation.
The problem with translating words and ideas doesn’t end with the differences in language. If the translator doesn’t fully understand the subject, or fails to grasp the minute distinctions that a guru will often make, then the translation will be wrong.
Cahir claims that a traditional translation “maintains the overall traits of the book” (16) which include “its plot, settings, and stylistic conventions but revamps particular ways
André Lefevere (1992) proposes that translation is a rewriting of the source text, in which the relationship among various shareholders certainly influence the production of the target text. This is especially prominent in translating Lolita, which allows multiple interpretations; for instance, whether the tie between Lolita and Humbert Humbert is passionate love or destructive
This book mainly focus on the relationship between translation and culture. It addresses the shift of focus from translated block of text to the binding of translations and the cultures involved in generating these translations. It also covers the significance of translation for cultural planning.
Second, we can think of translating as an act of re-creating, in the sense that translators produce something that is recognized as literature (whatever that is--anyone who has read the first chapter of Terry Eagleton’s Literary Theory will realize how difficult it is to precisely define literature).
Translations are essential to us and our culture, because through ancient documents, inscriptions and books, historians and archeologists reconstruct the ancient societies and civilizations, as well as the story of our forefathers and the history of the entire human race. They allow communication between us and different countries and nations, whose language might be different from ours and this may create difficulties in being able to understand each other. However, translators make this possible as they are the mediators between two different cultures. The need for translations is massive, from both a social and political outlook. According to David Katan’s Translating Cultures, “The translator is a bilingual mediating agent between monolingual communication participants in two different language communities” (16). Therefore, for a translation to succeed translators have to be not only bilingual, but also bicultural. A translator is furthermore put in an exclusive but at the same time, difficult position because it is his responsibility to clarify certain ideas within cultural and natural boundaries. This can be done by keeping the same exact (literal) meaning. Interpreting and translating a text is not a simple and easy task; it takes time and is also challenging, because “the translator cannot merely search for equivalent words in the target language to render the meaning of the source” (Dingwaney and Maier, 3). Up until today there are many translations of ancient works and books, such as the Odyssey; and so, there is a wide range for people to choose from. This choice must be taken with the most care because some may be exceptionally good at communicating the essence of the original text while others ...
translation which are all close or very close to the ST (source text) (Schjoldager, 2008, p. 93-99). Therefore, they are not considered as creative skills and strategies, and texts translated using merely these cannot be considered creative translations. On the contrary, eight strategies in some way add to the level of creativity when applied in translations (which are Explication, Condensation, Deletion, Addition, Paraphrase, Adaptation, permutation and Substitution). Within these eight creative strategies and skills, the degree of creativity varies as well. The model of creativity classifies the strategies explicitation, condensation and deletion as slightly creative since they merely involve elaborating on existing meaning, shortening text and taking out meaning. The other five creative strategies, however, are rewriting semantics of the ST or adding meaning which cannot be directly inferred from the ST. Therefore, they are regard as more creative.
In the late 1970s, the focus of translation studies shifted to the process of translation as well as the receivers. Hans Vermeer is the founder of Skopos theory. As the Greek word skopos indicates, this theory stresses that translati...