Democracy Vs Representative Democracy Essay

1. In any community, political authority can be looked at either positively or negatively. The folks that look at authority in a positive light, in turn, usually obey the law. This obedience stems from their belief that the group that made the law has the right to, in addition to their own duty to comply. Individuals that look at authority in a negative light are obliged to abide by the law or face the consequences. From this, Miller’s idea of political authority incorporates standard authority and forced compliance. It is suggested that people have duties to obey authority because they provide us with basic protection from hostile parties and supply the conditions on how individuals make their living. However there are objections that people who oppose

I feel that the two types of democracy that work well at a national level are direct and representative democracy. Direct democracy supports the voice of the individual voter and abides by majority rule. However, this downside with this is the process of voting can get complicated when it’s performed on a larger scale. Representative democracy leaves people free to carry on their daily lives due to an elected representative that solely focuses on voting and organizing. This can expedite the entire process compared to that of a direct democracy. When it comes to the student body at Green Mountain College, I would say that a representative democracy would be better suited to handle issues. As we have touched upon in class, a majority of the student body possesses a liberal ideology, which is natural due to the type of institution we pride ourselves on. Still this leaves a minority that doesn’t share the same views. This is where a direct democracy would fail to work effectively mainly due to our schools ideology but not due to the size of our student body. That is why I feel a representative democracy would be the most effective