Dehumanization Of Ingroups

1353 Words3 Pages

Human beings are predisposed to group themselves into communities often on arbitrary basis’ (such as sports teams) to foster a sense of belonging. This is a beneficial trait that allows for a sense of self within a community, which is integral to the mental wellbeing of humans. Since “Ingroups” are created by groups of people who hold a shared belief or characteristic (ethnicity, gender, religious affiliation etc.), there is typically a group who holds an alternate, if not completely opposite belief. Strict adherence to “Ingroup” and “Outgroup” distinctions can lead to the dehumanization of the perceived “Outgroup” and cause serious rifts if the two groups reside in a single society. This is evidently seen in the conversation between communities …show more content…

Each individual is a part of many “Ingroups”, each Ingroup has a place in the hierarchy of a person’s identity. Individual “Ingroups” might change over time, as well as which ones are ultimate on their list of “Ingroups”. Should a person share all of your “Ingroups” except your most important, self-defining “Ingroup”, their lack of that distinction becomes a primary factor in how you and the now “other” interact. Some Ingroup distinctions are so integral to a person’s identity that the lack thereof within another individual completely reshapes the view of the individual. This is exemplified in the stigma placed on individuals who do not believe in Evolution. Within the scientifically minded West, a high moral authority has been placed on scientific thought and postulation. The esteem is so great that a belief in Evolution is attached to the perceived intelligence of an individual as a whole in the eyes of the public. Should a person not believe in evolution, through the negative social stigma that carries, they are deprived of the ability to contribute to academic scientific thought by the scientific community and the public they service. This interaction can happen within an individual, between two individuals, or on a grand scale between two encompassing …show more content…

Humans see the world through many ideological lenses. These ideological lenses come from a shared hierarchy of value held by a group of people. However, these ideological lenses can be changed and superseded by other ideologies. This is seen in an experiment which asked individuals to look at images of people from many ethnic backgrounds. The examiners were viewing areas of the brain that lit up when viewing people of their same ethnicity in comparison to those who are from a different ethnic background. Not surprisingly, areas showing pleasure were active when viewing people from their own respective “Ingroup”. Now, the second time the researchers showed the same pictures of the same people with one key difference, each person was now wearing a piece of sports team paraphernalia. This time the areas of the brain that indicate pleasure lit up only when a person who shared their own sports team flashed on the screen. This shows us that humans not only sort individuals immediately based on the information they have on a basis of “Like me” or “Not Like Me”, but also that those lines which define Like and Not Like are fluid. When examining different aspects of an individual, a person who was once “Other” can quickly become

Open Document