Deforestation of The Pacific Northwest

1206 Words3 Pages

Deforestation of the Pacific Northwest

One of the most controversial areas associated with the global problem

of deforestation is the Pacific Northwest of the US. The problem can be broken

down into several issues that all tie in together. These include the near

extinction of the Northern Spotted Owl, the "business" aspect of logging versus

the environmental aspect, and the role of the government in this problem.

In 1973, the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was passed. This enabled the

Dept. of Commerce and Dept. of the Interior to place species, either land or

marine, as either threatened or endangered. Under these terms species could no

longer be hunted, collected, injured or killed. The northern spotted owl falls

under the more serious condition of being endangered. Also, the bill forbids

federal agencies to fund or carry out any activity that would threaten the

species or its' habitat. It is the latter part of the bill that causes the

controversy. Under the ESA, loggers should not be allowed to cut down the old-

growth of the forest. The old growth of a forest includes the largest and

oldest trees, living or dead. In the case of the North Coast forests, this

includes some thousand-year-old stands with heights above three-hundred feet and

diameters of more than ten feet.

In 1990, the number of spotted owls dropped to 2000 breeding pairs. The

preservation of any species contributes to the biodiversity of an area. In an

ecosystem, the absence of one species creates unfavorable conditions for the

others. The absence of the spotted owl could have a significant effect on the

North Coast forest ecosystem. In order to send the owl population in the right

direction, the major problem for their decline would have to be remedied – loss

of habitat. This fact combined with the owls' short life expectancy and late age

of breeding only exacerbates the problem. When loggers remove old growth the

owl loses habitat for its' food, housing, as well as protection from predators.

Approximately ninety percent of the forests in the Pacific Northwest have

already been harvested. In order to protect the current owl population, the

remaining forests would have to be preserved, but this would have a serious

negative economical effect. Such a decision would effect jobs, regional economy,

as well as the lifestyle of loggers. With such a...

... middle of paper ...

...siness. In some cases, the money subsidizes the large

companies for things such as logging roads in order to keep the cost of paper

and other tree products down. These same companies ship their lumber to Japan

for milling before they are sold back to the United States at a higher price.

Not only does the public lose money in this process but it costs Americans a

number of jobs. On the other hand, agencies have made efforts to prevent

deforestation. Members of the Forest Service educate not only the large

companies, but the private landowners as well. It is the private owners who own

sixty percent if the forests being harvested. By helping to show how

conservative forestry techniques can be made efficient as well as more

profitable, they are helping to diminish the rate of deforestation. If more

money was spent on research and the spread of new and better techniques, then

the taxpayers' money would be better spent. In conclusion, there are several

aspects of deforestation in the Pacific Northwest that need to be evaluated

before the situation becomes irreversible. If the current harvesting techniques

continue, our children will be missing more than the spotted owl.

More about Deforestation of The Pacific Northwest

Open Document