Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Deontology vs utilitarianism
How ethics affect decision making
Ethics and personal values
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Deontology vs utilitarianism
Defining “Right”
The topic of morality and what is right or wrong is a deeply complex and profound subject. There is not a basic rule as there is in physics; there is no Newton’s law of motion and conservation of mass to base all theories upon. The shape of right and wrong must be modeled after the morals and values of the given culture, using the moral compass as a guide. There are frame works such as utilitarianism and deontological that pose questions that help use analyze the find the “right” thing to do. With anything, there is no steadfast rule on what is the correct framework to use. It is a mix between different thought process mixed with your personal values that help create a personal sense of “right” and “just”.
Ethical Relativism
Ethics cannot be discussed without first addressing ethical relativism and pointing out the potential traps of this flawed thinking. Ethical relativism argues that ethics is, “simply a matter of opinion”. (DesJardins, 2011. pp 29) It contends that everybody opinion is equally valid, without taking into account evidence or research to support the opinion. This would negate the whole purpose of the study of ethics, since if everything is valid, there is no use to investigate decisions further. Ethical relativism can be attractive since it requires only a basic level of analyzes of the issues and does not require to dive into the true substance of the issues. It is the easy way to assert everybody’s opinions are on equal ground. Tempting as it is to apply ethical relativism, it will ultimately produce only unsupported and faulty idea of ethics.
In an article, “The Challenge of Ethical Relativism in a Coalition Environment” by David Whetham (2008), explores the ethical quagmire of different et...
... middle of paper ...
...ture has different needs and expectations of ethics; there is no “one size fits all” definition for the word “right”. The best we can do is to understand the different frameworks available to help guide to a successfully application of the word.
References
DesJardins, J. (2011). An Introduction to Business Ethics (4th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Guyette, R & Piotrowski, C(2010). Preferences for key ethical principles that guide business school students. Education, 131(2), 268-271.
Tanner, C., Medlin, D. L., & Iliev, R. (2008). Influence of deontological versus consequentialist orientations on act choices and framing effects: when principles are more important than consequences. European Journal of Social Psycholog,1(38), 757-769.
Whetham, D. (2008). The challenge of ethical relativism in a coalition environment. Journal of Military Ethics, 7(4), 302-316.
Nye, Howard. PHIL 250 B1, Winter Term 2014 Lecture Notes – Ethics. University of Alberta.
Our ethics and values are shaped from events and decisions dating back as far as we can remember, and in some cases even further back to times we cannot remember. Our heritage and cultural backgrounds can also play a large part in how our ethics are formed. As a society each individual fits into one of the four ethical profiles, and in many cases more than one of the profiles, what can make an individual extraordinary is the ability to learn from others that don’t share their own ethical beliefs and benefit from that shared knowledge to make themselves a better all-around individual. As the saying goes, no one is perfect, but the pursuit of perfection can be quite an experience for those that accept that challenge. Moral and ethical dilemmas will continue to arise in our lives from this moment until the moment we depart this plane of existence, it is what we do with those moments that set us apart from
In general, the term utilitarianism can be defined as the ethical or right action is the one that results in the greatest good for the greatest number. Therefore, some people suggest that rightness or wrongness is determine by numbers that are total the positives and the negatives outcome of an action or the one that produces the highest score of positives or negatives that is the most ethical, or right, thing to do (Neher, W. W. Sandin, P.J., 2007, p. 61).
There are many ethical systems that were created over the years, each created to support curtain people’s beliefs, cultures, and ideologies. Out of all the systems that were presented in this course I believe that relativism and absolutism most aligns with my beliefs. Relativism is the fact that there is no absolute and that what is considered right and wrong varies from person to person and society to society. While absolutism “is the ethical belief that there are absolute standards against which moral questions can be judged and that certain actions are right or wrong, regardless of the context of the act”.(Philosophy, n.d). I believe that there is a right and a wrong in the world (absolutism) but,
Ethics: while defined by Merriam-Webster dictionary as “the discipline dealing with what is good or bad [through] moral duty”, this concise phrase does not seem to encompass the word’s full connotation. The way ‘ethics’ is defined in the dictionary alludes that there is a black-and-white answer to whether an action, belief, or opinion is ethical. Unfortunately, when applying this term to real life, decisions are almost never as clear cut as right or wrong. Why then, are we so quick to judge things as right or wrong, good or bad, ethical or unethical?
Cultures vary depending on the extent to which they build virtues based on all the five foundations. Therefore, the liberals who only rely on the two foundations, find it hard to comprehend the moral motivations of the conservatives and therefore the culture of war. To them, the two foundations are all they require to make sound moral judge...
It is hard to pinpoint the true definition of ethics. Although it could be defined, in simple terms, as what the society approves of right and wrong, defining ethics as simple as that is “unethical”. In fact, since centuries, several philosophers have disputed with the definition of ethics and several have come up with their own philosophical ideas of ethics. But, for the time-being, the definition of ethics can be expanded to “well-founded standards of right or wrong that prescribe what humans ought to do, usually in terms of rights, obligations, benefits to society, fairness, or specific virtues” (Velasquez et. al). Because the definition of ethics is so confusing and conflicting, at times, it arose to a branch of ethics that investigates
What makes actions right? For some philosophers it is their consequences, like the pleasure or happiness that they produce. However for a deontologist like Immanuel Kant, rightness is the action itself and the obligation to perform it. His ethics is a theory of how a person should act, the actual action and morality of the action. It entails that as long as a person acts in a moral way then the consequences of the actions do not matter. “For Kant, doing the right thing is not a matter of one’s character or disposition or circumstance – all of which are or might be beyond one’s control. Instead, it is the matter of duty, acting out of respect for the moral law.” (Stangroom, J. & Garvey, J. 2005, p.79) Moral Laws are a system of guidelines for controlling human behaviour; like society laws. The Ten Commandments set by Moses are moral laws with the commands of a divine being, moral laws can be a set of universal rules that everyone should abide by. Kant argues that: “The moral law cannot be hypothetical in nature, cannot be of the form, ‘if you want such and such, do so...
While ethical relativism states that a person must respect another person’s culture and behaviors according to the behavior and customs that are considered moral pertaining to that society when the action happens in that society. Ethical absolutism declares that there are certain actions that everyone in any society should consider unethical. Regardless of the context of certain action or the society where it is happens, certain actions remain as equally immoral if the action occurs in America or if the action occurs in a small island in the Pacific Ocean according to ethical absolutism. Ethical absolutism is proclaiming that there is a universal ethical code which involves everyone regardless of the culture or society. Ethical relativism makes an attempt to understand the behaviors in other cultures or societies without judging the action by the standards of an incompatible society where the action does not happen. Ethical absolutism does not undertake the same strategy as ethical relativism, there is no room for understanding behaviors in other cultures because once it is seen as wrong then it will always be wrong no matter the explanation behind the
Throughout the centuries the great thinkers of mankind have sought to develop comprehensive theories of ethics. The proper study of ethics requires us to consider such questions as right and wrong, vice and virtue, obligation, and value. It is this sort of self-reflection on the part of mankind that separates us from the animal kingdom. Indeed, the importance of studying ethics cannot be understated as the eminent philosopher Louis. P Pojman writes in his book Ethics Discovering Right and Wrong:
For Cultural Relativism, it is perfectly normal that something one culture sees as moral, another may see as immoral. There is no connection between them so they are never in conflict relative to their moral beliefs. However, within the context of Ethical Relativism there’s a significant difference. Normally, two cultures will possess varying proportions of the same normal and abnormal habits yet from a cross-cultural standpoint, what is abnormal in one culture can be seen as properly normal in an...
Ethics is defined as a study that deals with what behavior is considered to be, good or bad. Ethics is about doing what is right for other people throughout society (Kraft). Ethical principles result from religions, philosophies, and cultural ideas. The world is changing and so is everything in it, judgments about what is ethically right and wrong are also changing. Ethical relativism is important within society, along with utilitarianism, deontology, virtue-based ethics, and ethical principles of healthcare.
right or wrong in human behavior; based on what is you think is right or good. Morals
Ethics, by definition are the moral principles that govern a person’s behavior. Implementing ethics is essential in any given society. This paper will introduce the purpose of ethics as well as the values that are shared throughout American society, Subjective Relativism and the threats that are posed from this, and Utilitarianism as a way of life.