Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The function of a judge
Judicial decision making
Role and function of judges
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The function of a judge
In the criminal justice system, lawyers are divided into two separate but equally important groups: the defense attorneys who ensure their clients’ rights are protected and the prosecutors who ensure criminals answer to their alleged crimes. This is their story. The nature of America’s courts demands that prosecutors and defense attorneys act in opposition to one another, with each party seeking opposing verdicts. Despite this dichotomous nature, great lawyers often rise above simply pursuing a winning record, as seen in Community. In the episode “Basic Lupine Urology,” viewers can learn that both prosecutors and defense attorneys participating in the legal system must pursue the truth more than victory, despite operating in a system that does not value this perspective.
In this homage to Law and Order, the Study Group must investigate the “murder” of their biology project. When the alleged perpetrator—a former study group member named Todd—is found, Jeff and Annie, two members of the study group, act as prosecutors primarily concerned with salvaging their grade. During the process of the trial, however, Jeff’s focus begins to shift towards uncovering the greater conspiracy at hand while Annie is only interested in getting an A. the dichotomy between the two approaches of the prosecutors, along with the behavior of Colonel Archwood, Todd’s defense attorney, serve as the primary framework for the analysis in this essay.
Although there are instances where attorneys cannot handle the truth, there is much to be gained for those who can successfully bear it. In today’s society many lawyers are solely concerned with getting the verdict they were looking for, whether it’s putting a criminal behind bars or getting a passing grade on a b...
... middle of paper ...
...tory and instead focus on the truth, while also making sure they are fully representing their clients (in the case of defense attorneys) or making sure a defendant is innocent before easing up in their examination (in the case of prosecutors) lawyers bypass mediocrity and insure justice for all.
Works Cited
Awad, Akram. "The Judge Panel." Taper Hall, Los Angeles. 26 Sept. 2013. Lecture.
Radford, Simon. 10 3 13 Simon's Notes. N.p.: n.p., 3 Oct. 2013. DOCX.
Schrab, Rob, dir. "Basic Lupine Urology." Community. NBC. 26 Apr. 2012. Television.
Robert A. Kagan, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management , Vol. 10, No. 3 (Summer, 1991), pp. 369-406
Robert A. Kagan, Law & Social Inquiry , Vol. 19, No. 1 (Winter, 1994), pp. 1-62
Hengstler, Gary A., and R. W. Ide. "Vox Populi--the Public Perception of Lawyers: ABA Poll." ABA Journal 09 1993: 60.ProQuest. Web. 11 Nov. 2013 .
...ue?" Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 32.3 (2009): 1155-85.ProQuest. Web. 25 Feb. 2014.
There are certain standards that the courts use to determine competency. In order to find the accused competent, a court should find out by a preponderance of evidence that the defendant has remarkable ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational indulgence. The def...
Wasserstrom considers a few options with in his discussion concerning a multitude of aspects faced by lawyers. "The lawyer's situation is different from that of other professionals. The lawyer is vulnerable to some moral criticism that does not as readily or as easily attach to any other professional." Thi...
Palmer, Elizabeth A. "The Court and Public Opinion." CQ Weekly 2 Dec. 2000. CQ Weekly. SAGE Publications. Web. 1 Mar. 2000. .
This problem affects everyone, but only benefits four types of people; the judges, the lawyers, the clients paying thousands more to the lawyers to win their case, and the police. Judges today are not playing fair, and they are accepting bribes from equally corrupt lawyers that are desperate to win a case and improve their case winnings over their losses. The lawyers are asking for more money from the clients so that they can secretly hand over cash to the lawyers and ask for “favors” in the courtroom. With all of this injustice, comes fear implanted in the client, who is then willing to spend more on a lawyer to guarantee their success in a case; “fear and injustice equals more money for lawyers and judges”(Sachs).
Oct 1993. Retrieved November 18, 2010. Vol. 79. 134 pages (Document ID: 0747-0088) Published by American Bar Association
Remy, Richard C., Gary E. Clayton, and John J. Patrick. "Supreme Court Cases." Civics Today. Columbus, Ohio: Glencoe, 2008. 796. Print.
people in these 21st century society wonder, “When is Justice to be done?” For district attorneys,
Plomin, R & Asbury, K. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, July 2005; vol. 600, 1:pp.86-98.
Abadinsky, Howard. Law and Justice: An Introduction to the American Legal System. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2008. Print.
Columbia Law Review, 104, 1-20. doi:10.2307/4099343. Reynolds, S. (2009). The 'Standard'. An interview with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
After analyzing the discourse community of law and the detailed process lawyers take in order to write an effective appeals brief, one can see that lawyers have a very specific and unique way of communicating that includes certain jargon unfamiliar and possibly incomprehensible to the general public. Although writing an appeal brief is only one aspect of many that government prosecuting attorneys such as Kenny Elser face in their jobs on a daily basis, it is also a very necessary job because not only is it used by a single discourse community in the law profession but utilized by the discourse community of law as a whole.
Stuntz theorized that due to public defenders being overburdened with cases, the mechanism of criminal procedure, results in the disadvantaging of indigent defendants. Due to Public defenders being underfunded and subsequently overworked, especially when compared private counsel, defendants often are divided into the procedural haves and the procedural have-nots (Stuntz