The Insanity Plea has been used again and again in the US courts, but it should be disproved because of the true legal definition, because many people try to fake insanity, and because of how the social concept of insanity is different than the actual mental illness. There have been numerous times that the US court has publicly stated their opinion on the insanity plea. On the US Court of appeals website, it states that “The court reviewed the case and issued a ruling, which stated that a plea of insanity would prevail only if the defendant’s unlawful act was the product of a mental disease or a mental defect” (US court of appeals, page 1). The US court systems have stated many times that just because the defendant has had a history of mental illness does not mean that they are automatically acquitted. The mental illness must have a specific correlation to the crime that was committed.
Most court cases end in one of the following two ways: Guilty or Not Guilty. In addition to these simple verdicts, information is sometimes provided as to why the jury came to its conclusion. Such is the case for Not guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI). While the first two scenarios are simple and fair, the last choice has raised more than a few eyebrows over time. Many believe that the Insanity Plea is a simple way to get a high-stakes criminal off the hook, though many would also disagree and say that the Insanity Plea is a justifiable resolution to court cases.
"(Such as a person, according to the APA, understood his actions but might be unconcerned about their consequences.) · Psychiatrist testimony should be limited to such areas of competence as a defendant's motivation or mental state. · Persons judged "not guilty by reason of insanity should not be released without careful consideration by state or federal authorities. It also stated that psychiatrist were unable to predict the "dangerousness" of such persons. (APA) The American Psychiatric Association issued a position in defense of the insanity plea in criminal trails.
When a criminal offender has repeated abnormal behavior, antisocial conduct, is continuously displayed the defense ignores their plea and they are charged guilty. Not all fifty states accept the insanity defense, however they allow pleads with mental disabilities if it negates a culpability element (Robinson 6).The requirements and standard structure that are common for disability excuses are reflected by the defense. The defense helps those that are handicapped by a disease or defect that provides an excuse based off of their mental condition. The verdict can only be charged guilty by reasons of insanity if the defendant has a dysfunction in relation to the offense court. The def... ... middle of paper ... ...Dec. 2013. http://historyforensicpsych.umwblogs.org/the-insanity-defense-outline-by-andrew- garofolo//the-insanity-defense-outline-by-andrew-garofolo/the-durham-rule/ Good Question: How Does An Insanity Defense Work?
They are notori... ... middle of paper ... ...er know precisely what goes on in a psychopath’s mind (Jadczyk). Psychopathic killers usually grow up in similar, unstable homes. However, they usually have completely different crime scenes. Most of these killers have different motives for murdering their victims. Work Cited Jadczyk, Arkodiusz and Laura Jadczyk, “What is a Psychopath” Cassiopaea.com, 1997-2009.
I have discovered that people get away with so much in result that they can plead insanity. Many criminal cases nowadays are coming out and admit that those convicted and pleaded guilty of insanity due to a mental disorder, were forging their insanity. We refuse to acknowledge that a sane person could kill people but learn that these people have the ability and desire to do such horror to other people. To diagnose someone with insanity, according to the observation of the Andrea Yates, one must suffer and be diagnosed with a form of a mental disorder. A correlation between mental disorders and syndromes are also linked to insanity but not all me... ... middle of paper ... ...annot.