Declaration Of Independence Rhetorical Analysis

1326 Words3 Pages

1. The purpose of the Declaration of Independence was to announce and stress the separation of the thirteen colonies to Great Britain. The tone was extremely straightforward, direct, and critical. They wanted to make sure that King George III and Britain understood its terms of severance from the mother country. The speaker of the Declaration would include both, the population of the colonies (or the new United States of America) and Thomas Jefferson, the main writer of the declaration.
2. Throughout the draft, we see that many lines have changed completely or extended to include some variation of the word, “separate”, for the editors comprised in the Continental Congress chose to put a spotlight on this particular word to repeat and reinstate …show more content…

“We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction”- The word, unwarrantable, has a negative connotation because it defines the British government actions upon the colonies as unjustifiable.
“They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity.”-Deaf is a loaded word because it’s interpreting Britain as unjust and not attentive towards the thirteen colonies, so this creates a negative connotation because the Colonists are again, angry at Britain and its hostility towards the colonies.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”- Liberty is another loaded word, for it has a positive connotation because everyone in the United States were craving freedom and …show more content…

To make sure the reader is still engaged, Jefferson uses parallel structure in regards to the idea that are extremely important in terms of rights and turning away from Britain. For example Jefferson’s main idea was “We hold these truths to be self-evident”. Jefferson writes, “that all men are created equal”, “that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights”, and “that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it” to exemplify the level of importance of that same thought. Also, he focuses on the idea that Britain and King George III was corrupt and that his actions were intolerable. By utilizing parallel structure, he included more phrases to dwell on that fact, such as, “He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for public good” and that “He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants

Open Document