Death Foretold

1407 Words3 Pages

“There had never been a death more foretold” (Marquez 50). The inevitability of Santiago Nasar’s death in Gabriel Marquez’s Chronicles of a Death Foretold due to the inaction of the community parallels to Griselda Gambaro’s passive audience in Information for Foreigners. Such passiveness of these two groups resulted in many tragedies and horrible crimes as they acted as mere spectators relishing in the act of witnessing. Through the use of a fragmented narrative structure and suspension of disbelief, Marquez and Gambaro develop witnessing/voyeurism thematically in their works. In Gambaro’s play, Information for Foreigners, roving groups of audience members are led by tour guides to witness scenes of shocking violence and torture at random. …show more content…

The anonymous narrator returns to the town where it happened 27 years earlier to collect testimonials from eyewitnesses and other people in the community to recreate a clear picture of the events that led up to the senseless murder. Chronicles of a Death Foretold is presented in a fragmented, nonlinear fashion, leaping between the events of the murder, the events that led up to it, and the years after. Marquez chooses to tell the story in such a manner to focus more on comprehending the situation involved in the murder. In the story, there are many instances where the community could have stopped the murder from happening but did nothing. This could be explained by the fact that as many people heard the brothers, “twenty-two people declared they heard everything” (Marquez 51). It could also be argued that the community did not take action as they either believed that this was inevitable or that “no one paid attention to them” (Marquez 52) and that the brothers were “a pair of big bluffers” (Marquez 56). Even those who did believe them, such as Santos, Armenta, and Colonel Aponte, did little to stop them. Santos only informed the officer. Armenta tells a lot of people to pass along the message to Nasar, but nothing more. The colonel merely sends them “off to sleep” and “took away their knives” instead of taking proper action (Marquez 57). Despite the inaction of the community, Nasar’s murder could have been as something inevitable that the brothers had to follow through because of the community’s morals and values. “Spare those poor boys from the horrible duty that’s fallen on them” shows the obligation and necessity of the murder that must be committed (Marquez 57). The brothers claim they would have “done it a again a thousand times over” (Marquez 48), shows the expectation of society that they are expected

Open Document