A free society is deemed as a civil government with a well-executed political and social structure. The idea of a free society is that all aspects of political and social order in a working government are in tack without any problems. The entrance of any resistance can cause a significant problem in the entire free society. These problems of civil disobedience in American history have seen long-lasting outcomes with negative effects. The peaceful resistance to American laws seen through the boycotting of British goods from 1764-1775 and the current pride parades in response the pro-LGBTQ laws demonstrates a negative impact on a free society. American citizens’ boycott against the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Sugar Act of 1764 caused negative outcomes towards America’s future of the time. The Sugar Act of 1764 was designed to replace the expiring Molasses Act of 1733 which required a tax rate of 6 pence per gallon on French molasses. The Stamp Act of 1765 was issued by British government in the attempt to pay back the annual £385,000 debt to keep British troops in America. These two Acts …show more content…
The reaction of the newly signed LGBTQ laws demonstrated drastic effects of retaliation from different states with new anti-LGBTQ protests and laws. Because of the boycotting of British goods and pride parades of LGBTQ rights, peaceful resistance leads to negative outcomes for the protesters. Philosophically, peace is not attainable through society in order to create a perfect utopia. Philosophers die down to the idea that there must be peace in the heart and mind in order for there to peace in all of life, as said by 6th century philosopher Laozi. As a society, must have peace in ourselves in order to bring peace into all of society which ultimately leads to the perfect
Without colonial consent, the British started their bid to raise revenue with the Sugar Act of 1764 which increased duties colonists would have to pay on imports into America. When the Sugar Act failed, the Stamp Act of 1765 which required a stamp to be purchased with colonial products was enacted. This act angered the colonists to no limit and with these acts, the British Empire poked at the up to now very civil colonists. The passing of the oppressive Intolerable Acts that took away the colonists’ right to elected officials and Townshend Acts which taxed imports and allowed British troops without warrants to search colonist ships received a more aggravated response from the colonist that would end in a Revolution.
However, corrupt practices kept merchants in the colonies from having to pay the taxes. The Sugar Act was a modification of the Sugar and Molasses Act of 1733, so The had placed tax on each gallon, so The colonies stop having to pay the taxes.The Sugar Act of 1764 disrupted trade between the American colonies and French markets and was one of the laws that hastened, and ended with, the American Revolution. The growing disconnect between the American colonies and other British holdings in tax compliance inspired greater enforcement by the
After the Seven Year War, Britain now needed to find ways to generate money, and felt that since the war was fought on American land that they should help pay for its cost, and they decided to issue new taxes on the colonies trying to offset some of the cost of the war. One of the first acts they presented was the Sugar act in 1764, lowering the duties on molasses but taxed sugar and other items that could be exported to Britain. It also enforced stronger laws for smuggling, where if prosecuted, it would be a British type trial without a jury of their peers. Some Americans were upset about the Sugar Act because it violated two strong American feelings, first that they couldn't be tried without a jury of their peers, and the second that they couldn't be taxed without their consent.
In 1764, the Sugar Act was enacted, putting a high duty on refined sugar. Even though silent, the Sugar Act tax was hidden in the cost of import duties making most colonists to accepted it. The Stamp Act, however, was a direct tax on the colonists and led to an uproar in America over an issue that was to be a major cause of the Revolution tool to oppose taxation without representation. To Americans, British government had no mandate to pas an act affecting colonists without their representation the litigation aimed at oppressing colonists. The duty not only targeted on sugar but its products. The implication it carried traversed along economic lines of civilians in raising the cost of living. The move made it difficult for firms as the cost of production went up with minimal sales as people abandoned Britain products.
The Sugar Act of 1764 was the first act used by the British to channel revenue into Britain. The British specifically stated in the Sugar Act, "…a revenue be raised in your Majesty's said dominions in America, for defraying the expenses of defending, protecting, and securing the same" (The Sugar Act). This proves that the British were using this act just to raise revenue because they needed it to defray the cost of fighting against the French. The act forced tariffs on goods being imported into the colonies. Examples of these goods were sugar, molasses, foreign indigo, and coffee. This angered the colonists because they were depending heavily on trade with other colonies and countries outside of the North American continent. The colonists specifically stated in a petition from the Massachusetts House of Representatives to the House of Commons on November 3, 1764 that a "prohibition will be prejudicial to many branches of its trade and will lessen the consumption of the manufactures of Britain" (King, Peter. Petition from the Mass...
The new acts of the Colonial Era sparked a controversy between the American colonies, the British Government, and the British Parliament. The British felt that the colonists should be held responsible for the debt owed by the British armies while they were protecting the colonies during the French and Indian War. The colonies strongly disagreed and upon hearing this the British devised a strategy against its relations with the colonists that would continue to make things worse between the two nations.
A lot of people say that the southern part of the united states is what started the war. Their stubborn ways force the north to take action which lead to the civil war. In all reality there was more that came into play when the civil war was in the making. States rights was one of the problem that lead to the civil war, the constitution did not define who had what powers and what authority over one what. Also slavery played a part because the slaves were raising up and fighting for their rights in which the south did not like and and the north tried to help only making the problem worse. The differences between the free states and the slave states was the power of the national government to prohibit slavery in the territories that had not yet
The Stamp Act made the colonists pay a tax for any paper that required a stamp. Unlike the Sugar Act, this act affected everyone instead of primarily merchants and store owners. Now everyone could not pay the taxes. “The Stamp Act swept all the rivulets into one central stream of resistance and revealed that Americans already passed the prerequisite to united actions against the mother country: a common ideology” (Miller, 1959, 169). The Stamp Act was denounced as encroachment by parliament upon royal prerogative. Both acts were met with resistance such as riots because no one liked to be taxed by a country hundreds of miles away (Miller,
History has many exciting and devastating times.During the 1600s-1700s there has been a series of acts and wars.During this time there were many famous people at the time this happened.People like George Washington,Benjamin Franklin,Paul Revere,and King George III.One of the reasons is because after the French and Indian War;the british were taxing without representation.This starts the American Revolution.The British and the Patriots started to get heated at one another.After the French and Indian War the British said no one was a loud to cross the Appalachian Mountains,but the colonist did anyway.This is how the American Revolution happened.
Then the matter of liberty comes up; we believe that we are free but the reality of it is that we are in the shackles of the government. They control our every aspect of life: what we do, when we do, where we do and how we do it. The only liberty we have is what we think and how we choose to act on those thoughts. We have the freedom to choose what will make us happy as far as life goes and that will lead into the topic of the pursuit of happiness. To make it simple the pursuit of happiness says “we have the right to chase dreams,” but if we take a look around, we persecute people every day because they choose to live a life style that makes them happy. They get cursed, things thrown at them and maybe killed because of their religion. The same with homosexuals, they are treated like
Leading up to the time of the Revolutionary War, seven policies were passed by Britain in hopes of controlling the colonies. These acts culminated in the Quebec Act which persuaded many Americans into supporting the revolutionary effort. The Proclamation of 1763 was the first policy passed by the British. This forbid any settlement west of Appalachia because the British feared conflicts over territory in this region. The proclamation, however, infuriated the colonists who planned on expanding westward. The Sugar Act was passed shortly after in 1764. This act sought harsher punishment for smugglers. The next act to be passed was possibly the most controversial act passed by Britain. The Stamp Act passed in 1765 affected every colonist because it required all printed documents to have a stamp purchased from the British authority. The colonist boycotted British goods until the Stamp Act was repealed but quickly replaced by the Declaratory Act in 1766. The British still held onto the conviction that they had the right to tax the Americans in any way they deemed necessary. The Declaratory Act was followed by the Townshend Acts of 1767. This imposed taxes on all imported goods from Britain, which caused the colonies to refuse trading with Britain. Six years passed before another upsetting act was passed. In 1773, the Tea Act placed taxes on tea, threatening the power of the colonies. The colonies, however, fought back by pouring expensive tea into the Boston harbor in an event now known as the Boston Tea Party. The enraged Parliament quickly passed the Intolerable Acts, shutting down the port of Boston and taking control over the colonies.
The American Revolution gained momentum throughout the Colonies due to popular belief that Great Britain was a tyranny. Because of this, a revolution was founded on the idea of freedom. The founders envisioned a country where their “Constitutional and political freedoms” (“Road to Revolution”, 25:10) would not be threatened. Which they believed where endangered by British Parliament. Giving the revolution a conservative label. Conservative, meaning they were not an oppressed population revolting against a higher power, but common people concerned over their Liberty’s. But considering this took place in the middle of the 18th Century, America indeed was doing things radical, compared to the rest of the world. Abolishing an anarchy and moving to a system that had checks and balances. Likewise, the slave population in America were attempting to gain their freedom as well. Slaves, like America, were equally justified to claim their right to freedom.
The United States of America was founded and has been built on the principles of freedom. From the very beginning, the nation has been working towards equality for all. As such, it allows for peaceful protestation of laws that are considered to be unfair or wrong by some. Thus, peaceful resistance to laws has a positive impact upon a free society.
In y opinion peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society because the people got to know what they are dealing with in that they have rights .''When the bus filled up and no seats remained, the driver ordered four African Americans, including Parks, to clear their seats so that a white man could sit down. All but Parks acquiesced.Parks was arrested for her act of civil disobedience and convicted of violating the Jim Crow laws that enforced racial segregation in the South until 1965''.This show that she resented to getting off because that was not a free society that why people should resented to any right that they think it's wrong. another example is ''Security Agency programs that collect vast amounts of information about the telephone calls made by millions of Americans, as well as e-mails and other files of foreign targets and their American connections. For this, some, including my colleague John Cassidy, are hailing him as a hero and a whistle-blower.''This man is a hero even Dow adore say that he is not because he is showing
The Sugar Act was something that actually reduced the tax on molasses eliminating the incentive to smuggle thereby increasing the amount of people willing to pay duty. This reduction, although a good idea, did not make much money. So, the British parliament brought in the Stamp Act. The parliament assumed that because the British people had been living with the tax for about 70 years and there had been no revolts in Britain that the Colonists would accept it. Unfortunately, they were wrong.