Day Of Thanksgiving During The Civil War

1165 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: History of thanksgiving

By the time of the Civil War, every state had established an annual day of thanksgiving to express gratitude for general blessings. The date for Thanksgiving Day was set by individual governors, that could lead to variety of results: most states celebrated in November, a few marked the day in October or early December. In early years of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis issued proclamations appointing days of thanksgiving for military victories. These proclamations referred to God - “the Sovereign Disposer of events” (Davis) and “the Lord of Hosts” (Lincoln), but unlike the Thanksgiving proclamations sometimes issued by governors, they were not Christianized. It seems that two presidents followed the example of Washington, …show more content…

He called for a day of national humiliation and prayer- not a day of thanksgiving to be held throughout the Confederacy on November 15. In April 1862, Lincoln issued a proclamation following military victories on the Union side and did not set aside a separate day of thanksgiving. Later in 1862, Davis also issued a proclamation of thanks for Confederate victories over the Union army and set a day of thanksgiving and worship for Thursday, September 18. The final thanksgiving for a military victory was proclaimed by Lincoln when he named Thursday, August 6,1863 as the day of “national thanksgiving, praise, and prayer.” All Lincoln and Davis’s proclamations were only aimed to their separated own populations: Northerners in Lincoln ‘s case and Southerners in Davis’s. It is necessary to have the more remarkable one with the united …show more content…

She is the person who used her position as editor of the most popular magazine of the pre-Civil War era to conduct a years-long campaign for a national Thanksgiving holiday. Hale saw Thanksgiving as s patriotic occasion along with the Fourth of July and Washington’s Birthday. Moreover, she also saw Thanksgiving, with its emphasis on family reunions and a special meal, as falling into the feminine sphere. It reflected, too, what she saw as the generous spirit of the American people. Hale first wrote about Thanksgiving in 1827, in the “Northwood: A Tale of New England” novel, devoting a chapter to describing a Thanksgiving that a visitor from England celebrates with a family in New Hampshire. She took up the topic again in “Traits of American Life”, a book of essays published in 1835. The second edition of “Northwood”, published in 1852 a subtitled “Life North and South,” expanded on the notion of Thanksgiving and called for it to become a national event. Especially, “Godey’s Lady’s Books” was a powerful platform to encourage the celebration of Thanksgiving in all corners of the expanding country. This magazine printed a recommended menu for Thanksgiving dinner that included in New England classics as well as sweet potato pudding, a Southern standard. She also promoted her campaign by publishing recipes for traditional Thanksgiving dishes such as roast turkey and

Show More
Related

  • Apostles of Disunion by Charles B. Dew

    961 Words  | 2 Pages

    On the question as to whether states’ rights was the cause of the Civil War, Dew references a speech made by Jefferson Davis, president of the Confederate States of America, during his inaugural address as one that “remains a classic articulation of the Southern position that resistance to Northern tyranny and a defense of states’ rights were the sole reason for secession. Constitutional differences alone lay at the heart of the sectional controversy, he insisted. ‘Our present condition…illustrates the American idea that governments rest upon the consent of the governed, and that it is the right of the people to alter or abolish governments whenever they become destructive of the ends for which they were established’”(13).

    Read More

  • The Argument against Secession and its Justification

    912 Words  | 2 Pages

    When Abraham Lincoln spoke at his inauguration on March 1861, the nation’s mood was grim. It was a frigid day and the sky was grey. Even worse, nobody knew how the newly-elected President, a novice lawyer, would handle the nation’s biggest problem since its inception: Southern secession. The U.S., and its grandeur and resplendence were at stake and were now reduced to nothing more than the preposterous “Disunited States of America.” Americans were in a state of perplexity, and one question remained etched in the minds of Americans: “Did the South have a legal right to secede from the Union?” No, the South did not have a legal right to secede from the Union, due to the longevity of the Union, the solidarity between the states, and the menacing implications secession entails.

    Read More

  • Lincoln's First Inaugural Address Summary

    540 Words  | 2 Pages

    Disapproval, the Confederacy, and slavery were amongst the many crises Abraham Lincoln faced when addressing his First Inaugural speech (Lincoln, First Inaugural, p.37). Above all, Lincoln’s speech was stepping on the boundaries of the southern slave states. Once states began to secede, new territories formed and the disapproval of Lincoln grew. Despite Lincoln’s attempts of unifying the antislavery and confederate views, many whites refused to follow his untraditional beliefs. Lincoln encountered hostile and admirable emotions from the people of the Union and the Confederacy. However, despite his representation of the Union, not everyone agreed with his views.

    Read More

  • Summary: Why The North Won The Civil War

    999 Words  | 2 Pages

    Jefferson Davis, president of the Confederate States of America, showed weaknesses within his leadership which may have contributed to the confederacy’s loss and the unions win . Davis failed in three vital ways. These ways were: his relations with other confederate authorities and with the people, as well as in his fundamental concept of his job as president and in his organization and specific handling of his role as commander in chief . Davis failed in maintaining communication with leaders and with his people, often unable to admit when he is wrong which led to lack organization in his role . In addition, Davis was a conservative leader, not a revolutionary one which meant that his strength was often in protocol and convention rather than in innovation . Studying each of these aspects that represented a weakness in Jefferson Davis’s leadership, Lincoln in comparison provided more admirable and outstanding qualities within his leadership which in many ways affected the outcome of the war

    Read More

  • Lincoln's Suspension Of Habeas Corpus Analysis

    1451 Words  | 3 Pages

    The American Civil War not only proved to be the country’s deadliest war but also precipitated one of the greatest constitutional crises in the history of the United States. President Lincoln is revered by many Americans today as a man of great moral principle who was responsible for both preventing the Union’s dissolution as well as helping to trigger the movement to abolish slavery. In retrospect, modern historians find it difficult to question the legitimacy of Lincoln’s actions as President. A more precise review of President Lincoln’s actions during the Civil War, however, reveals that many, if not the majority, of his actions were far from legitimate on constitutional and legal grounds. Moreover, his true political motives reveal his

    Read More

  • What Caused The Civil War Dbq

    554 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the 1860’s the United States weren’t united because of the issue of slavery. The civil war was never just about getting the union back together, but about making it count and getting rid of slavery. The south wanted their slaves and would say they are “-the happiest, and in some, the freest people in the world”. (Doc 5) However, the north knew that was not true because of Harriet Beecher Stowe's “Uncle Tom’s Cabin”. In 1854 when the Kansas-Nebraska act was passed it caused some issues. Anti-slavery supporters were not happy because they did not want expansion of slavery, but the pro-slavery supporters weren’t happy because they wanted slavery everywhere for sure. (Doc. 7)The Kansas-Nebraska act caused trouble before it was even passed, Senator Charles Sumner argued against and attacked pro-slavery men causing Preston Brooks to beat Sumner with a cane. The south praised Brooks while the north felt for Sumner. (Doc 8) In 1858 during his acceptance speech Lincoln said his famous line, “A house divided

    Read More

  • The Perils of Expansion during Thomas Jefferson and James Polk

    875 Words  | 2 Pages

    Had Thomas Jefferson and James K. Polk exercised greater moderation in their attainment of western territory, the polarization of American North and South need not have been as drastic as it proved. Forcing the hotly contentious issue of slavery to the forefront, sudden westward expansion reshaped American sociopolitical dynamics, carving a deep philosophical chasm between the North and South. As the existence of such a divide equated to the decomposition of both regions’ economies, the war of ideas waged in broadsheets and in the halls of Congress gave way to a war fought with bayonets, on the plains of Kansas and, later, in the East.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Irrepressible Conflict Between The North And South

    1061 Words  | 3 Pages

    The turmoil between the North and South about slavery brought many issues to light. People from their respective regions would argue whether it was a moral institution and that no matter what, a decision on the topic had to be made that would bring the country to an agreement once and for all. This paper discusses the irrepressible conflict William H. Seward mentions, several politician’s different views on why they could or could not co-exist, and also discusses the possible war as a result.

    Read More

  • Character Analysis Of Reverend Hale In The Crucible By Arthur Miller

    577 Words  | 2 Pages

    subject of this essay is Reverend Hale. This essay is going to be over seven parts of

    Read More

  • Gettysburg Address Rhetorical Analysis

    893 Words  | 2 Pages

    Four and a half months after the Union defeated the Confederacy at the Battle of Gettysburg, Abraham Lincoln delivered the Gettysburg Address on November 19, 1863. He gave the Union soldiers a new perspective on the war and a reason to fight in the Civil War. Before the address, the Civil War was based on states’ rights. Lincoln’s speech has the essence of America and the ideals that were instilled in the Declaration of Independence by the Founders. The sixteenth president of the United States was capable of using his speech to turn a war on states’ rights into a war on slavery and upholding the principles that America was founded upon.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Cornerstone Speech

    1146 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander Stephens was the vice president of the Confederate states of America during the civil war (1861-1865) and he is the one who gave the famous speech known as “the Cornerstone Speech” where he stated openly the ideas on which the new government was founded: the supremacy of whites over blacks. Stephens played an important role in drafting the new constitution and he had the opportunity to present the new form of government in the speech that took place in Savannah on March 21, 1861. The Cornerstone speech played a pivotal part in certain aspects of the way this nation has shaped out to be. Analyzing this document and other sources will give us insight on what was actually going on in the southern states and how the response of the northern

    Read More

  • The American Civil War Was Inevitable

    1627 Words  | 4 Pages

    Roark, J.L., Johnson, M.P., Cohen, P.C., Stage, S., Lawson, A., Hartmann, S.M. (2009). The american promise: A history of the united states (4th ed.), The New West and Free North 1840-1860, The slave south, 1820-1860, The house divided 1846-1861 (Vol. 1, pp. 279-354).

    Read More

  • Essay On The Emancipation Proclamation

    770 Words  | 2 Pages

    Lincoln 's view on slavery was that he was highly against it. Lincoln is known as an abolitionists; someone who doesn 't agree with slavery. He supported the 13th Amendment simply because it would put an end to all slavery in the United States. Lincoln would often give speeches to the public about how he was against slavery. His words were, "Resolutions upon the subject of domestic slavery having passed both branches of the General Assembly at it 's present session, the undersigned hereby protest against the passage of the same." What Lincoln was saying is that problems of slavery have not been resolved they have just been ignored. The skaves protest that they don 't feel they should be ignored or their issues. Lincoln 's cabinet also had their own opinionated views about Lincolns decision on the Proclamation. The opinions from the cabinet were mixed, meaning none were the same or a few were the same but not ever all the same. "William H. Seward convinced Lincoln to wait to issue the Proclamation until after a Union military got a victory." The Union got that victory on September 17, 1862 at the Battle of

    Read More

  • The Emancipation Proclamation of 1863

    1543 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...h the Confederacy. Even if the goal of the Emancipation Proclamation was to win the war, it was also a moral value because at the end of the war, Lincoln supported the 13th amendment, which ended slavery in the USA. Looking at different sources such as Eric Foner’s “emancipation proclamation” and McPherson James’s “how president Lincoln issued the emancipation proclamation” , it is clear that opinions differed regarding the purpose of the emancipation proclamation, but both of them argued that it was both a military tactic but had also a moral value behind it.

    Read More

  • Richard Hofstadter's American Political Tradition By Abraham Lincoln

    1213 Words  | 3 Pages

    By the time of his speech South Carolina, Mississippi, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Louisiana and Texas had already seceded from the Union. In his speech Lincoln had three main points: “to hold, occupy, and possess the property and places belonging to the government,” secession was impossible because the Union was unbreakable, and that any use of arms against the United States would be met with force but he would never be first to attack (Grafton 80). Lincoln aspired to increase his support in the North without alienating the South where most disliked him in fear of the end of slavery. In his speech however, Lincoln made it clear that his intention was not to interfere with slavery quoting “I have no purpose, directly, or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so” (Grafton 81). In hope to make amends with the South Lincoln closed by saying “We are not enemies, but friends. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield, and patriot grave, to every living heart and hearthstone, all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature” (Grafton 81). Although meant to unify the North and South, this address had a larger impact on another

    Read More

More about Day Of Thanksgiving During The Civil War

Open Document