On my third day of clinical course I had an African America patient age 72, female, a retired high school teacher who was admitted for an Acute Diverticulitis with Perforation. She is diabetic and had a medical and surgical history of diverticulitis, High Cholesterol, Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (NIDDM), Hysterectomy, and Scoliosis. She has been on clear liquid diet since she was admitted then she was Nothing by Mouth NPO for the CT scan for that day. When I got the assignment that I was going to be taking care of a patient with an acute diverticulitis, the first thing on my mind was that she will be in a severe abdominal pain, high fever due to infection because my aunty had same disease. To my surprise, she claimed a 0 /10 on a 0-10 pain scale. Her blood sugar and vital signs were normal except for respiratory that was 22. All her laboratory test results were normal including WBC. Patient concern was that she couldn’t have a bowel movement. She was medicated on Colace- a stool softener, morphine for pain, sulfran for nausea, and azactam an antibiotics.
Met with the patient upon request as the patient approached this writer in the lobby area. This writer agreed to meet with the patient to address his concerns. According to the patient, he was in a MVA on 4/27/2017 on the highway leaving Vernon, CT. The patient was unable to dose on the weekend due to failure to report the MVA and not having the hospitalization report from Hartford Hospital (discharge summary). This writer explained to the patient about the clinics protocol as this was discuss during his Orientation II with this writer as this writer remember mentioning it during the group session about any visits to the ER and/or any hospitalization, patient are responsible for producing the discharge summary to medical.
The first issue is Cynthia Cash Will valid and enforceable. Under California Probate Code 6110, the requirements for a Will to be valid it must be in writing, signed by a competent maker of 18 years or older, and attested to by two or more witnesses. First, Cynthia did not have two witnesses when she signed her Will and dated. Second, when she wrote her Will on the napkin and attaches it to her typewritten assets it becomes invalid because her assets were typed and not written. Lastly, if one to make an argument Cynthia was not competent. The element of competent is forgetfulness, moments of confusion, and bizarre behavior on grounds that the Will was lack of competent. The reason for Cynthia to be competent would be that she consumed too much
On Wednesday, August 29, 2015, at approximately 2:31 p.m., I, second shift Assault Detective Matthew Grasham, Badge #1661, along with second shift Assault Detective Russ Henslee, Badge #2131, conducted an interview with CARLISA CARTER. Ms. Carter was identified as a witness in this incident by Defense Attorney William Ireland. The following is a summarization of the interview:
On 3/5/2016 SO EMT Perez was dispatched to FC-518 regaurding a Vitals Check. SO EMT Perez knoacked and announced his presence at the door. SO EMT Perez was greeted by the resident a Mrs. Cynthia Cohen. Mrs. Cohen stated that she had been feeling shaky and uneasy for the past 3 days and wanted to go to the hospital to get checked out. Mrs. Cohen also stated that she had not had a bowel movement in 2 days and her last Blood Presure she took was 203/112 about 15 minutes to SO EMT Perez's arrival. Mrs. Cohen stated that she has hypertension and she had taken her BP Medication 15 minutes prior as well. SO EMT Perez performed an assesment which revealed the following; Blood Pressure 180/100, Pulse 86 bpm and Sp02 94%. Mrs. Cohen stated that she had
On April 6, 2016 at approximately 1:30pm, a civil case of medical malpractice of Aubreigh Michelle Washington, the plaintiff who was represented by her mother, against DCH Health Care Authority, the defendant, was presided by Judge Almond. The plaintiff’s attorney began the session by introducing a deposition testimony from Aubreigh’s doctor from the DCH Health Care. In the testimony, the attorney had questioned the doctor about the how long he has been Aubriegh’s doctor and her medical conditions. The Health Care staff had apparently perform a medical practice without Aubreigh’s mother consent, breaching their duty of care. The plaintiff’s deposition testimony of the defendant conveyed to the jury that the doctor had perform unknowingly on
In the event of the shooting and death of the Louisiana State Trooper Steven Vincent, Kevin Daigle has attended his first court session and is awaiting his sentencing. This court session was held on August 24, 2015; where Daigle acknowledged, “That he would likely face the death penalty if convicted of first-degree murder” , said Fox News. Daigle was apprehended and arrested on August 23, 2015 after committing the murder. His first court session was held in a small room beside the main courtroom, where a number of other inmates awaited their hearings. It is stated that, “Daigle is charged with first-degree murder of a police officer and aggravated battery, according to KPLC” (Fox).
This letter is being written at the request of Marisha Carpenter to once again address her living arrangement at Shepherd College. As stated in a previous letter, Ms. Carpenter would be better suited to live off campus in an environment that minimizes stress and other distractions. Continued exposure to the stressful environment which is common of campus life, can severely limit her ability to focus and concentrate, thereby impeding her academic success.
The plaintiff has asked us to evaluate Cynthia Bavaso’s liability for trade secret misappropriation. Under the Illinois Trade Secret Act (ITSA), to make a claim for trade secret misappropriation the plaintiff must establish that: a trade secret existed; the secret was misappropriated through improper acquisition, disclosure, or use; and the owner of the trade secret was damaged by the misappropriation. 765 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 1065/2(b) (2010). We will examine the defendant’s actions in acquiring her former employer’s confidential customer list; Bavaso’s potential breach of the Statement of Confidentiality; and if Bavaso’s actions caused irreparable harm to the plaintiff.
After Erin Corwin, the wife of a marine went missing in 2014, no one knew where the excited expecting mother could have vanished to.
“Elaine” is a 34-year-old white female patient with an extensive medical history. She has a history of seizures, uncontrolled diabetes since the age of fourteen, neuropathy, fibromyalgia, COPD, Sleep Apnea, and is currently suffering from two venous ulcers on her feet. She came to the ER one week ago with nausea and vomiting and was found to be in Diabetic Ketoacidosis and her wounds had become infected. She spent three days in the ICU and for one day was ventilated. She was then sent out to the Medical/ Surgical for further management 3 days ago.
On admission, a complete physical assessment was performed along with a blood and metabolic panel. The assessment revealed many positive and negative findings. J.P. was positive for dyspnea and a productive cough. She also was positive for dysuria and hematuria, but negative for flank pain. After close examination of her integumentary and musculoskeletal system, the examiner discovered a shiny firm shin on the right lower extremity with +2 edema complemented by severe pain. A set of baseline vitals were also performed revealing a blood pressure of 124/80, pulse of 87 beats per minute, oxygen saturation of 99%, temperature of 97.3 degrees Fahrenheit, and respiration of 12 breaths per minute. The blood and metabolic panel exposed several abnormal labs. A red blood cell count of 3.99, white blood cell count of 22.5, hemoglobin of 10.9, hematocrit of 33.7%, sodium level of 13, potassium level of 3.1, carbon dioxide level of 10, creatinine level of 3.24, glucose level of 200, and a BUN level of 33 were the abnormal labs.
Rhonda Swenson is a ninety-one-year-old, Caucasian, female who lives in West Hills, CA. She was born in St. George, Utah and was the sixth of eight children. Her parents had a stable, happy relationship. Rhonda reports that she had a good relationship with her parents. Rhonda pointed out that while she and Darlene, her sister two years younger, argued a lot while growing up, they are now best friends and have often travel together.
Upon receipt of this referral, I contacted Tina Southerland to discuss the case. I contacted Beaumont Botsford Hospital and obtain Mrs. Schaefer’s room number 454B. I spoke with the nursing staff and I inquired about who was the assigned case manager. The staff seemed confused on who was assigned and they paged a case manager, I spoke with her regarding Mrs. Schaefer and that I would be making a visit the next day, 7/14/17. I inquired about obtaining necessary paperwork and I was informed the nursing station can help me obtain the information that I needed. I notified Mrs. Schaefer’s daughter in-law and left a voice mail message. She later returned the call and wanted to be present. I coordinated to meet with her and Mrs. Schaefer at Mrs.
One important fact in this case is medication that the physician administered to the patient is not listed in the case study. All information must be documented, this helps to keep track in the event the patient gets a reaction this is significant information that must be recorded. Although this may be unimportant to the case this should still be listed. As this patient condition worsened he was diagnosed with osteomyelitis. As mentioned above knowing all medications being administered are important, when treatment first began the pharmacist in this case did exceptionally well keeping track of the medications being administered. Another important factor is that the pharmacist kept track of the care being provided to the patient because the pharmacist reviewed patient results he was able to make suggestions to the physician to check the patients creatinine levels. However the pharmacist in the case is the defendant. Although the pharmacist did well in reviewing the patient’s information during most of the treatment, he did fail to do a follow up check. The