Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
us history the cuban missile crisis
world's conflict and wars caused by religion (essay)
the cause and effect of the cuban missile crisis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: us history the cuban missile crisis
Culture is an essential part of conflict and conflict resolution. Cultures are what shapes our perceptions, attributions, judgments, and ideas of self and other. We are all born individuals; then we are raised, socialized and sensitized to the norms of our respective civilizations which led us to identify consciously and unconsciously to our societies. In 1993, Samuel Huntington wrote an influential paper that was published in Foreign Affairs titled “ Clash of the Civilizations.” Huntington states, “The great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflict will be cultural (Huntington 1993, 1).” According to Huntington, cultural identities bind people together more fastidiously than those identities of nation state citizenship. Religion and culture are huge factors in people’s motivations from business, to politics, down to personal interactions. At the macro level Huntington adds, “Differences in religion and culture create difference over policy issues ranging from human rights to immigration to trade and commerce to the environment (Huntington 1993, 5).” Huntington describes the current riffs between civilizations as fault lines, elaborating “fault lines between civilizations are replacing the political and ideological boundaries of the Cold War as the flash point for crisis and bloodshed (Huntington 1993, 29).” The fault line between Christianity and Islam has seen conflict for 1,300 years but today we are witnessing the fault lines reemerge and deepen. In this paper I will discuss what historical events and policies led to the current conditions in Sudan, how the conflict in Sudan illustrates and supports Huntington’s theory, and I will examine how this conflict has effected United States foreign policy.
Wh...
... middle of paper ...
...Economist - World News, Politics, Economics, Business & Finance. http://www.economist.com/node/347120 (accessed November 4, 2011).
Pakenham, Thomas. The scramble for Africa, 1876-1912. New York: Random House, 1991.
Pillar, Paul. "Sudan and the Sanctions Trap." The National Interest. http://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/sudan-the-sanctions-trap-5591 (accessed November 4, 2011).
Public Broadcasting Service. 2011. "Sahel." PBS. www.pbs.org/wnet/africa/explore/sahel/sahel_overview.html. (accessed November 4, 2011).
Salopek, Paul. “Lost in the Sahel.” National Geographic. http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/04/sahel/paul-salopek-text.html. (accessed November 5, 2011).
“Context: Why the Conflict? Why in Sudan?” World Savvy Monitor. http://worldsavvy.org/monitor/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=49&Itemid=71. (accessed November 4, 2011).
In the Darfur region, part of Sudan, a civil war (often referred to as genocide) has been occurring for approximately 8 years. The current conflict began in 2003 when rebel groups, the Sudan Liberation Movement/Army and the Justice and Equality Movement, made up of the Fur, Zaghawa and Masalit tribes took up arms against the government of Sudan because the non-Arab Sudanese felt oppressed and that the government was in favor of Sudanese Arabs. A previous period of conflict in Sudan-Darfur during 1985-1988 saw only 9,000 killed, while during the first 3 years of this most recent conflict, 2003-2006, over 200,000 Darfurians are believed to have been...
Reeves, Eric, Massimo Calabresi, Sam Dealey, and Stephan Faris. “The Tragedy of Sudan.” Time. Time Inc, 4 Oct. 2004. Web and Print. 15 April 2014. .
Steinvig, Morten. "China Tries to save a Dilemma in Sudan." Forsvaret.dk. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Jan. 2013.
In 1898, Britain and Egypt took control over Sudan. This didn’t include Darfur, which was an independent territory ruled by a sultan. In 1916, Britain added Darfur to the territory it controlled. After World War II, in 1945, Britain and Egypt began preparing Sudan for independence. From 1945-1989, Darfur -remote from Khartoum and having invaluable resources- suffered neglect from all governments. Sudan has been independence since 1956. However, the journey that led to Sudan’s genocide in Darfur began in the late 1800s. It’s a complicated tale that involves conquest; internal politics; social, ethnical, racial, and re...
"Sudan Backgrounder | United to End Genocide." United to End Genocide. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 Apr. 2014.
The Sudan genocide, a civil war that was started in the early 1980s when drought, famine and the spread of un-arable land caused traditional African herders and Darfur citizens to argue over land. For the next 22 years relationships worsened between the Arab and non-Arab tribes. The Western region of Sudan: Darfur was thrown into civil war by its own government and two rbel armies in an uprising that should have been seen coming for a long time. This essay will elaberate on the events that occurred in Sudan over the past twenty two years and to what extent the mass killings that occurred can be defined as Genocide. The insurgeny began in Febuary 2003; goning virtually uunnoticed by the international community and shadowed by the ongoing war in Irac. The Sudan governent has been blamed for virtually every event during the past 22 years of civil unrest that has led up to the mass killing of hundreds and thousands of civilians. The many different ethinic groups in Sudan were constantly arguing and fighting over any and all issues and problems that could be brought upon to their attention; this led to growing tension. The mass killings in Sudan could be classified as ethnic cleansing; a term used to describe the killing of an ethnic group of people because their role in that society is unjustified or they are invading on terriotory that they are not welcome on.
The conflict in Darfur was caused by a rebellion. The people of Darfur felt neglected and took up arms against the government in an effort to gain more recognition. The most disturbing part of this story might just be how extreme the government’s reaction to this rebellion was. This act of rebellion
The aim of Samuel P. Huntington’s “The Clash of Civilizations” was to provide an academic framework to understand almost all of the conflicts that had broken out since the end of the twentieth century, to include predicting the appearance of future conflicts. According to Huntington, there will be a clash of civilizations since the world has been in an unreasonable era since the end of the Cold War and the position of the nation-state has not been of any significance. Far more than the political objectives of territorial take-overs, it is the religious element of culture that has become the main cause of conflict. It should be acknowledged that Huntington’s “Clash of Civilizations” is a relatively simple theory which focuses on illuminating the ins and outs of international politics. Samuel P. Huntington’s article played a prominent role in establishing today’s international relations field by defining culture and religion as the main culprit of today’s international conflicts. However, in order to validate such a standard lies within the capability to describe and interpret the real world and motivate people to seek how this theory allows one to understand current conflicts.
Throughout Northern and Central Africa ethnic fighting and mass genocide has run rampant. Clashes between, diverse ethnic and cultural people has caused instability, these mass humanitarian disasters that can no longer be ignored. With the help of other nations South Sudan can go from another mass genocide waiting to happen, to a region supplier of much needed resources, with the help of other nations. In the 1990’s Rwanda genocide was basically ignored by the United States government and because of this hundreds of thousands were either killed or injured in the area. In the early 2000’s the war in Darfur, created a campaign of ethnic cleansing against Darfur's non-Arabs. Again thousands of Africans were killed and the United States government and the American people ignored genocide.
Natsios, A. S. (2012). Sudan, South Sudan, and Darfur: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford:
Tadesse, Debay. Post-independence South Sudan: the challenges ahead. ISPI-ISTITUTO PER GU STUDI DI POLITICA INTERNAZIONALE. February 2012.no.46.
Dagne, T. (2002). Sudan: Humanitarian Crisis, Peace Talks, Terrorism, and U.S. Policy. Congressional Research Service.
Hamilton, Rebecca. "U.S. Played Key Role in South Sudan Independence." Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting. The Atlantic, 09 July 2011. Web. 05 Sept. 2011. .
The rise of this conflict can be traced back to European colonialism. As the British Empire continued to expand it incorporated Sudan into it’s empire in the 1890s. However at the time, Sudan was not the Sudan that is knew pre-2011. There were two a North and a South Sudan. The north was predominatingly a Arabic speaking Muslim North, and the south an English speaking Christian South. To prevent Egypt claiming North Sudan, the British combined the two regions into one. It can be classified as this being the start of the conflict. The two regions, were culturally,religiously, and ethnically different. Tensions were bound to rise based on these issues. When the British colonialism ended and Sudan declared independence in 1956, the borders were not altered. The country was still united into one Sudan. The British like most Colonial powers left the nation with an unstable government structure. The British supported the North more than it did the South, thus creating resentment and tensions between the two after the end of colonialism.
In 1992 within a lecture Samuel P. Huntington proposed a theory that suggests that people's cultural and religious identities will undoubtedly be the primary source of conflict in the post-Cold War world, this theory is known as the Clash of Civilizations. Therefore this essay provides a criticism of this theory, whether I agree or disagree with it and also the aspects I like or dislike about the theory as a whole.