Cry the beloved Country South Africa

838 Words2 Pages

“The Tragedy is not that things are broken. The tragedy is that they are not mended again.” (1.5.34)
Alan Paton wrote Cry the Beloved Country in 1948. During this time South Africa was under Apartheid. The Apartheid was an extreme case of racial discrimination that severely affected South Africa as a country and still continues to affect it to this day. Under the Apartheid African Native peoples were forced to find any sort of work possible that would keep food on the table, that included many unsavory jobs that were done out of necessity but would slowly become something much more dangerous. The danger would come out of the fact that even when done out of necessity these unsavory jobs would act as a parasite and would slowly influence and ruin their host without them even knowing it until it was too late. The book that is the subject of this essay describes the parasites of this time period in South Africa and the triumph over the ignorance that trails it. Alan Paton wrote a story describing the journey of a Zulu Priest from the South African countryside who embarks on a quest to find his estranged sister and son. Along this journey the Zulu Priest, Stephen Kumalo, is exposed to the unstable and unpredictable city of Johannesburg where he must hold on to his own personal ethics and endure the long and emotionally painful journey towards a better understanding, forgiving, and hopeful future. There are two main paradoxes in this story; the first is that of a priest’s son who murders Arthur Jarvis, a man that has dedicated his life to bettering the lives of the oppressed, which in this case are the African native peoples, which includes the man’s killer. The second paradox is that of the father of the murdered man, James Jarvis, and...

... middle of paper ...

...o took care and fought for the African Native peoples and was in the middle of writing down these novel thoughts of his when he heard something downstairs, when he went down stairs where a frightened Absalom Kumalo shot him. This paradox makes a martyr of both men. A man killed who is on the verge of seeing a new South Africa, and naïve man hanged for his nervous and accidental but fated murder of that man. This shows how one man is not enough to change the path of all the mislead men and women in the world. It was the fault of that time period that a man sent to help was killed unknowingly by those he helped. Without both of their deaths one cannot truly and completely come to realize how truly wrong this system is. One can reconcile this troubling paradox by seeing the impact that on the fathers of the men killed and how their family’s views on the future change.

Open Document