Criticism Of Textingto Cullington's Article

294 Words1 Page

Cullington responds to the criticism in her article by conducting her own research on this controversial topic. She does this in the second part of her article, where the methods section is located. Cullington gains support for the two conflicting views from interviews and past studies. Cullington starts off by citing many professors and giving statics as well as adding the views of her two past professors. Although there is great evidence for and against texting, she carries out her own research by collecting the results from students and teachers that she knew. She does a detailed analysis of the students’ English papers to see if her results were legitimate. Despite the fact her own research supports the idea that texting and writing have no direct link, she observes the impact of technology and the improvement and growth of modern communication. …show more content…

Texting and technology are quickly taking over our lives, we are free to send messages and view messages at our own leisure. Nonetheless, students are educated and know that text speak is not fitting for professional academic writing. Disregarding the evidence for and against texting, Cullington’s own results maintains the idea that texting has no effect on the students’ writings. I would say that her response is persuasive because she was able to survey and conduct an interview study on past teachers and students, as well as get their views on this topic. Moreover, she does an exceptional job performing a throughout study asking relative question as well as being able to personally read and analyze English writing for

Open Document