Criticism Of Plato's Theory Of Forms

Good Essays
Critique of Plato’s Theory of Form: Shortcomings and other conflicts and problem

The world according to Plato is divided into two worlds:
The Visible: The world we live in, the world we taste or touch.
The Intelligible: We can only grab this with our mind. It is made up of Abstract forms, which are absolute and this exists in the permanent relation with the visible realm and makes the visible realm possible as all our knowledge of the visible world is derived from here. Because only they possess the eternal unchanging truth of mind and not the senses.

Plato is not very clear about how the Forms relate to things in the realm of Intelligible and Visible.
If you take Plato to his logical conclusion then you would have to have so
…show more content…
The nature and extent of the participation is left ambiguous by Plato.
Third Man Argument.
Concept of Forms is not the only or obvious logical conclusion.
Ideals of perfection do not necessarily need any kind of independent existence.

Plato believed that everything we see true and around us is tangible since nothing exists in the world of the senses is lasting. Plato’s point is that we can never have true knowledge of anything that belong to the world of senses and tangible. We can have true knowledge of only those things that could be understood with our reason and investigation.
Plato’s obsession with eternal forms or true ‘ideas’ let to complete ignorance of changes in nature. He turned his back to the sensory world and shut his eyes to everything we see around.

Contradiction: Plato also believed The timelessness of the Forms is more than just a matter of their being the same through all the time, it is that they lie out in eternity of which time is only an
Get Access