Critically Evaluate Cupitt's Cultural-linguistic Approach to Religious Language

1296 Words3 Pages

Religion without doctrine, religion without creed, religion without belief in another, spiritual world we live in - that is what Cupitt is striving for since he denies the literal truth of virtually all the elements of religious creed: the afterlife, heaven and hell and the resurrection of Jesus Christ." are comments made by Julian Baggini after an interview with Cupitt. Cupitt is seen as "a man who wants to dispense with all religion's claim to truth, yet who sees something in religion that is worth preserving as religion supplies us with poetry and myths to live by and we need stories to live by because our existence is temporal and we always need to construct some kind of story of our lives and that story needs to have a religious quality." (TPM Online). On the other hand, Cupitt sees "the world before us is all there is. There is no God, no heaven, no mind and no language that exists outside our human biological sphere. In short, the world is `outsideless' and "is not a preparation for something better and as such we should live as if these were the last days" (Faithorg., U.K.). Against the backdrop of these Cupitt's claims, this essay seeks to critically evaluate the efficacy of his cultural-linguistic approach to religious language and to argue that his ever-changing position on religion, one, he says, should be without all doctrines, creeds and beliefs, only leaves his readers with the puzzle of why it should be called religion at all (Baggini, TPM Online).

Religion as Created by Language

This essay agrees with Malantschuk's belief that the spiritual crisis at the beginning of the twentieth century triggered off philosophers and theologians to seek enlightenment and assistance in Kierkegaard's dialectics of hu...

... middle of paper ...

...al development and to operate as a collective agency for progressive social change. Regrettably, this imaginative vision, this essay argues, betrays an important weakness in this thought: paradoxically the very strong eastern flavour of his philosophy may betray his true religion as what his religion actually is always seems strangely evasive (foundtain.btinternet.co.uk).

To sum up, Cupitt accepts and affirms the world despite viewing it as nihilistic and sees the world as entirely language-formed and thus inevitably involving distinctions. Though advocating that religion should be without doctrine or creed, he is similarly regarded by some of his critics as dogmatic and willfully destructive. If religion should be without doctrine or creed or belief in another, spiritual world, the nagging doubt remains: why call it religion at all? (Baggini, TPM Online).

Open Document