Critical Analysis Of The Metamorphosis

1023 Words3 Pages

The Metamorphosis is a novella byFranz Kafka, first published in 1915. It has been called one of the seminal works of fiction of the 20th century and is studied in colleges and universities across the Western world. The story begins with a traveling salesman, Gregor Samsa, waking to find himself transformed (metamorphosed) into a large, monstrous insect-like creature. The cause of Gregor 's transformation is never revealed, and Kafka himself never gave an explanation. The rest of Kafka 's novella deals with Gregor 's attempts to adjust to his new condition as he deals with being burdensome to his parents and sister, who are repelled by the horrible, verminous creature Gregor has become. Analysis Popular culture often portrays the contrast …show more content…

When the economic stability of the family shifts onto Mr. Samsa’s shoulders alone in Part II, a similar fate of resentment and instability is seen when Mr. Samsa immediately “put the worst interpretation on Grete’s all-too-brief announcement and assumed that Gregor was guilty of some outrage” . As demonstrated, the burden of finance on a single person once again results in bitterness and anger. With Mr. Samsa now being the only worker in the house, he experiences the same fatigue and animosity as Gregor, leading him to act impulsively by throwing apples at Gregor and injuring him. The image of his outrage clearly exemplifies the antipathy that he develops from being the only provider. A change in fiscal responsibility for all family members in the end of the work leads to a “closer examination that these weren’t bad at all, for all three positions—about which they had never really asked one another in any detail—were exceedingly advantageous and especially promising for the future” . This quote focuses on the potential improvement in the family when Mr. and Mrs. Samsa and Grete all contribute to the family’s livelihood. Their equivalent effort not only provides them a basis for economic security but it establishes a much more positive atmosphere than one where Gregor or Mr. Samsa is the only provider. This newfound hope develops a favorable image of the family situation as a …show more content…

By integrating these literary devices, he implies that in order to achieve a healthy family atmosphere, all members must contribute equally to common causes. Kafka uses symbols to contrast the difference in mood between the unequal and equal shares in financial responsibility of the Samsa’s family. He also uses imagery and settings to provide a transition between positive and negative polarities as a result of the shift towards equilibrium of responsibility. In conclusion, through his exploitation of symbols, imagery, and settings, Kafka develops the theme that it is necessary to have equal responsibility to maintain a lively

Open Document