Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
importance of art to the society
importance of art to the society
importance of art to the society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: importance of art to the society
In Sir Ken Robinson’s Ted Talk video, he had many major points that relate to the definition and importance of creativity. A major point how creativity is as important in education as literacy. According to Sir Ken Robinson, “we should treat it with the same status. He explains is that education is used to prepare use for the future, but the future is unpredictable.”.
A second major point in his speech is trying to show people how important creativity is and how people need to motivate children to keep doing it. He begins telling a story about a little girl that was involved in a drawing lesson, but the girl hardly paid attention in class. He showing how motivated the little girl and had a creative mind that wanted to be expressed.
After
…show more content…
He opened my eyes to really think about how the education system is taking away children’s creativity. School systems are so focused on being college and career ready, they decapitating the creative capacities students have. I have observed personally how teachers will stigmatize mistakes. When observing a classroom and student does an art project, but the teacher takes points away because it was not what they imagined what the picture should be of. At schools today, math and language are offered at least an hour every day, but students are lucky to get an art or music class for thirty minutes each week. I think that all the tests put on teachers to prepare students has caused the breaking away from creativity even more. Teachers are so worried about getting the mandatory information to the class that they forget about the creative side of teaching. Ken Roberson explains it in a way that gets people engaged and listening about this situation without them realizing at what extent. Just like Sir Ken Roberson, I believe it is our job to educate all parts of a person to help impact the future. It is my duty to find ways to motivate my students in the classroom to be creative and create a future of people that is gaining more than head
All students, and children especially, have tremendous talents, which are forgotten when their minds walk through the school door. Their forever developing talents and favorite interests are left for an uncreative school environment. I, for one, have always been taught and believed in an education, or following the guidelines of another, was essential in achieving wealth and success later in life. However, after listening to Robinson’s argumentative speech, I realize creativity and a valued education coincide with each other. To justify myself, creativity and thinking outside the box has led to many of the world’s advancements. Therefore, when teaching future leaders, and future generations of employees and employers, teaching creativity in a forever rapidly changing and unpredictable world would have benefits. At last, I believe that the educational system puts too much emphasis on a substantial, everyday American future over one’s happiness in a later life. Every human being is already born a unique artist, never made into one; constantly growing into a more talented
Robinson, Ken. “How Schools Kill Creativity.” Online video clip. TED. Ted, Feb 2006. Web. 26 March 2014.
Teaching using creative methods can help develop the whole child. It can make learning experiences more exciting, more relevant, create different contexts for learning, al...
1.1 Explain evidence, approaches and theories about the benefits of creativity for the well being of children and young people
...would be further motivated to love and study their subjects, and not be just thinking only about grades. If all teachers dedicate their human potential to their students, then students wouldn’t be scared to participate in discussions in spite of many stumbling barriers. The issues Ernest Boyer discusses in “Creativity in the Classroom” are of current interest not only in American educational system, but in my country as well. So,I would recommend this article to be discussed at teachers’ meetings in different types of educational institutions because the criteria of successful and creative teaching the author identifies in his article are universal and simple at the same time: just be dedicated to your job, care about your students, and don’t be afraid to learn and use new ideas in your classroom. Hence, creativity in the classroom often begins with a good teacher.
In the TED talk “How School’s Killing Creativity” Ken Robinson makes some very good points, he says that as we grow we are taught to be more practical than we are creative. He starts out with a very humorous approach to his topic; by starting out with several jokes the mood becomes lighter and he grasps the audience’s attention. As a college professor he knows a lot about education and what is being taught in schools today. As he begins to speak his main point is that all children are born creative, but through years of schooling we are taught from ‘the waist up’ and only taught how to use our brains at school. That in most schools the most important subjects around the world are math and
In their article, “The Creativity Crisis”, authors Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman explore the urgency of the downfall in the public’s “creativity quotient.” Bronson and Merryman emphasize the necessity for young children to be imaginative. Through an IBM poll, they verify that with the decrease of creativity in our society comes an array of consequences seen in the work field. The authors remind readers of another reason for the importance of creativity; they argue that creative ideas can solve national matters. Hence, Branson and Merryman believe that original ideas are key for a better world. Though I concede that creativity is a vital key to the solution of many national problems, I still insist that teaching creativity,
To get better education, thinking and learning power comes from our hearts and minds. As Ho says in the article “We Should Cherish Our Children Freedom to Think,” American schools provide opportunities to students and a path to achieve their creativity, which “people tend to dismiss or take for granted” (2007, p.113). Moreover, he also raised a question if American education system is so wretchedly lower in merit, “why is it that this is still the country of innovation” (Ho, P.113)? Kie Ho believes that creativity and freedom to think is the essential part in American education system. If students use critical thinking skill to develop creativity, they can better understand the material and evaluate their own behavior and characteristics. In many other countries, education inhibited the children’s freedom to think and that repressed the development of students’ activities.
Creativity is an essential attribute of human beings that is primarily developed in our childhood. Creativity is defined as the ability to use the imagination to develop new and original ideas or things, especially in an artistic context. This artistic context can range anywhere from visual arts, to music, to dance. Although, the problem today is that this critical role of imagination, discovery, and creativity in a child 's education is not being fulfilled to its maximum. The cause of this expanding problem is that too many art and music programs, which promote creativity, are being taken out of school programs. Problems around this issue then begin to surface; children will soon not appreciate, or realize, creativities ' vital importance and how it shapes oneself. Therefore, curriculum in schools is limiting the growth and development of creativity in adolescents.
Firstly, he uses humor to begin his TED talk while also grasping the audience’s attention. One story that he told in the beginning, is about a six-year-old girl who never payed attention in drawing class but one day she decided she would. The teacher shocked at the site of this, goes over to ask the young girl what she was illustrating and the girl replied and said, “I’m drawing a picture of God.” The teacher tells her that no one knows what God looks like but the girl opposes to this and says, “They will in a minute.” He then goes on to tell the story of when he was a college professor and what he observed, regarding creativity, during his career. Robinson passionately believes that “we don’t grow into creativity; we grow out of it. Or rather, we get educated out of it (Do Schools Kill Creativity).” Therefore, while working as a professor at the university, he noticed that many professors are one sided by placing all their focus on one perspective of a subject without seeing it any other way. Robinson asserts this claim when he states, “There 's something curious about professors in my experience -- not all of them, but typically, they live in their heads. They live up there, and slightly to one side (Do Schools Kill Creativity).” It is humorous to think that professors, metaphorically, “live in their heads” yet, it patently reveals the fact that public education systems tend to be one sided when creating a standard curriculum. Students who have outstanding creativity skills will never be recognized for their talent because teachers and professors fear that changing the system will diminish the academic success of students. Through his use of pathos, he persuades the audience of how educators act in regards to the implementation of creativity in public school
In this notable Ted Talk video "Do schools kill creativity?", Sir Ken Robinson discusses how public education systems demolish creativity because they believe it is essential to the academic growth and success of students. Robinson created a broad arrange of arguments to persuade the viewers to take action on this highly ignored issue, and he primarily focuses on how important creativity is. There are classes within schools that help utilize creativity, but they are not taken seriously by adults in society. Therefore, the value of creative knowledge decreases. Robinson uses an unusual combination of pathos and ethos to make an enjoyable dispute for implementing an education system that nurtures rather than eats away at creativity.
NACCCE definition of creativity: ‘Imaginative activity fashioned so as to produce outcomes that are both original and of value’(NACCCE, 1999:94).Creativity can motivate children to learn new information through a creative outlook. One of the biggest issues teachers have is between teaching required content and integrating creativity into the daily sessions. The National Curriculum and state standard often create boundaries towards the teacher’s ability to develop the lesson, as the intention of including creativity sometimes resorts in a teacher centred learning environment. The teacher’s role should be to generate lessons and create activities that encourage students to be more open to their creative side. This is vital as it exposes children with varying learning styles to different ways of learning.
Using creativity in the classroom will create strong students and help better them for the future. Now, students are just being taught to what is on the test. They do not learn how to be leaders, how to work in groups, people skills, or how to use their mind that is not just for memorizing the information. “The challenge now is to transform education systems into something better suited to the real needs of the 21st century. At the heart of this transformation there has to be a radically different view of human intelligence and of creativity” (Robinson K., 2011, p. 14). Using creativity and technology will allow the students to enjoy learning more. I noticed in my final project, that other students who weren’t education majors, saw this problem too. Many of them did not see creativity in a classroom, they felt that the school system was creating them into robots that taught them all how to think a certain way. Ken Robinson feels that, “we don’t grow into creativity; we grow out of it. Often we are educated out of it.” (2011, p. 49). Teachers should be teaching students how to be creative, and how to think on their own, so students will be able to go far in the future and succeed in any job they
Herein lies the problem. The children that we are educated are and will be faced with new challenges that current education systems all over the world have been failing to meet. It would seem that structures of mass domain education suppress the innately imprinted creativity found in every living person and widely known specialist on the subject, Sir Ken Robinson, goes as far as saying that we are, “educating people out of their creativity” (Giang, 2013). But if the school system is to make adjustments to explore and cultivate creativity more how are they to do so without losing total structure? Robinson acknowledges this by saying that, “in every creative approach some of the things we’re looking for are hard, if not impossible to quantify. But that doesn’t mean that they don’t matter.”
To begin with Sir Ken Robinson states that “creativity is the greatest gift of human intelligence” and therefore the education system should help children to realise their creative potential, unfortunately many are being displaced from their own true talents. Formal instructions and inquiry based learning are essential for creative education. There are some times when it is appropriate for the teacher to give formal instruction in skills a...