Crazy Eddie Case Study

950 Words2 Pages

2. Facts of the Case & Prevailing Accounting Issues
• Crazy Eddie was operated by Eddie Antar and multiple family members.
• Antar’s wife and mother earned more than $100,000 a year for doing very minimal work.
• Crazy Eddie’s went public in 1983. Antar’s public offering was delayed for over a year due to the underwriting firm finding Crazy Eddie’s financial records in disarray.
• Crazy Eddie’s stock was a huge success once it went public. The SEC even authorized the selling of 200,000 more shares than originally agreed.
• In the late 1980’s, Crazy Eddie’s began to see a corporate meltdown.
• Crazy Eddie’s annual sales volume increased between 1984 and 1987, creating a more complex accountability for Crazy Eddie’s executives in regards …show more content…

This caused a whirlwind with Crazy Eddie’s stock price, which never recovered.
• Crazy Eddie was taken over by a new company in November 1987.
• The new company found $65 million in shortages of inventory.
• Antar ordered an employee of Crazy Eddie to overstate their inventory by $2 million, which caused in their overall gross profit to be overstated by $2 million.
• The next year, Antar ordered Crazy Eddie’s inventory to be overstated by $9 million and accounts payable to be understated by $3 million.
• Crazy Eddie employees were able to overstate inventory by making inventory count sheets for items that were nonexistent.
• Employees were able to understand accounts payable by preparing fake debit memos from vendors and entered them into the accounting records.
• In the later 1980s, Antar ordered employees to include in inventory consigned merchandise and goods being returned to suppliers. (Knapp, 2015, p.112)
• Antar also overstated inventory by using transshipping transactions.
• One of the biggest accounting issues is every employee of Crazy Eddie’s was a family member of Eddie …show more content…

Typically, most companies that experience rapid growth, such as Crazy Eddies, do not adjust their internal controls; therefore, their internal controls are then weak and make them susceptible to fraud. In the early 1980’s, Crazy Eddies grew rapidly and bought large amounts of electronic products from their suppliers at large reductions, and then sold them to smaller consumer retailers at slightly higher costs, therefore, allowing Crazy Eddies to make a profit. In order for Crazy Eddie’s to be able to increase their retail sales, they then had to classify these transshipping transactions as part of its internal retail sales in order to increase existing retail sales. If Main Hurdman would have investigated the transshipping transactions, they would have noticed something was wrong, and being able to develop a more understanding of the risk of transshipping. All audit companies should be aware of the conditions in which fraud exists: incentive and pressure, opportunity, and rationalization. When Main Hudman planned Crazy Eddie’s audit in 1986, the auditors needed to see that the electronic industry boom days were over. This should have been a red flag for the auditors during this time; to be sure, they were evaluating

More about Crazy Eddie Case Study

Open Document