The United States Constitution is the most important document in American history. The founding fathers put intense time and effort into creating a system that would establish America as a great nation for a long time. The main focus of this paper is to figure out whether or not The Founding Fathers intended for America to be a Christian nation. In order to get a clear understanding it is essential to first look at the premises of the Constitution. Throughout this paper we will take a look at the views of Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison. In order to figure out how the Christian faith effected the Founding Fathers views, it is important to see what type of religious background they had growing up. It is also important to see the writings of the Founding Fathers and view the relation between them and the Bible. I will target George Washington and get an understanding of his Christian beliefs, James Madison and Benjamin Franklin’s ideas of Christianity, Thomas Jefferson and the influence of Christianity on his views, and the biblical correlation between the quotes and teachings of the Founding Fathers.
The United States of America has long been known as a pious country with references to God in phrases such as "In God We Trust" and "One nation under God." Many evangelicals consider these clichés to be affirmations that the United States was founded on Christian ideals. Some historians and scholars also debate that America's Founding Fathers' underlying reason for the First Amendment's notion of separation of church and state was to prevent their new nation from becoming a puppet of a church, as was the case of the Anglican Church in England. What many people do not know is that a great majority of the Founders were not practicing Christians, but followed much more freethinking philosophical schools. Many liberal Enlightenment ideals and free thought were actually the true ideologies of America's Founding Fathers, not Christianity.
The relationship evolved from the original European settlement to the time of the Constitutional Convention and the creation of the U.S. government in 1789. Ties between church and state started out as virtually the same and should be practiced as one such as when the Puritans pilgrims first come to the colony. The Puritans were the first to be allowed to have a decent amount of liberty regarding religion and were a well-known religious group from England that founded the Massachusetts Bay Colony. They completely tied religion to the government. Some of the rules tying government to religion included only Congregational Church members being allowed vote and you could only become a member if you believed and lived the way the church considered fit. The church also dictated clothing, how to do business, education and recreation. Puritans would harass, extreme persecution like public whippings, and force individuals out of the settlements. This did not set well with Roger William or William Penn. Roger William fought for religious freedom and later bought a piece of land known today as Rhode Island allowing this idea. William Penn founded Pennsylvania and was someone who spoke for religious freedom. He is also the founder of a new church called Society of Friends or Quakers. These two men helped pave the path for religious freedom we practice today. This influenced the American government formation in 1789. Two individuals that led this movement were Thomas Jefferson, the President of America during this time, and James Madison who is considered the father of the Constitution. During the writing of the Constitution Madison agreed saying that the relationship between religion and government need to be separate in the Constitution o...
America’s foundation started in Puritans like John Winthrop whose religious ideals lead him to teach that the community would alway be more important that the individual, but in the eighteenth century the people’s point of view had changed dramatically, as seen in writings by Transcendentalists like Ralph Waldo Emerson. Some people may read Emerson and think he writes about the ‘common good’ of society, but truly he only looked at the good of the individual. For Emerson there was no common good, because the definition of good, in his eyes, was so different from person to person. In his essay Emerson writes, “No law can be sacred to me but that of my nature.” (Emerson, 137) In this quote he reject religion as well as the laws of good and bad,
It’s so ironic that Harry Jackson and Tony Perkins publish the “Personal Faith, Public Policy” in 2008 when the United States is experiencing such a major shake with the Federal Government. The question was asked, what kind of government do you want (Jackson, Perkins, 2008)? Then the choice was given: honest, efficient government that has security for property, life and personal freedom (Jackson, Perkins,2008). All the above choice is necessary; however, the government is on the Lord shoulder (Isaiah 9:6). God has ordained four institutions of authority: self-government meaning (I Peter1:15-16) the biblical standards of conduct; the institution of family, how it is structure (Ephesians 6:1-4); the institution of civil government meaning
This governing belief is celebrated by liberal parts of American society. At the time of the country’s founding a huge majority of its people were followers of the Christian faith. So, while separation of church and state was accepted at a small level, there was hardly ever any need to enforce it. Since more waves of colonists arrived on the country’s shores, bringing with them their native religious and cultural inheritances, this principle found a more common application in problems of public disagreement. Although liberal politicians and reporters really appreciated this separation. Also, among the group of scholars now recognized as the founding fathers of the country, there were different opinions and disagreements. Some were pro-slavery
The American Covenant begins when God directs chosen people to this promised land,. His purpose behind this new nation and its covenant was to establish a foundation whereupon His children might fully exercise their agency to choose Christ and His gospel and thus qualify themselves for eternal life.
Let’s start by looking back in time at some earlier forms of government to review historical philosophy to see if faith or faith groups were a part of the governance of its citizens.
“The religion of Husband and other Regulators—frontier Protestants who were members of Baptist, Presbyterian, Quaker, Moravian, and other evangelical or pietistic sects—emphasized an individualistic approach to church, salvation, and personal morality that profoundly influenced their understanding of public relationships and economic issues” (87). What Husband advocated was political activism based on Christians’ moral duty. The use of ‘God’ was present in the citizen’s petition because they, too, were religious people, who were trying to make a better life for
I believed that men are free by nature and people have rights in their life, liberty, and property, which should allow them to have the similar rights in a legitimate political government. Not only that, but governments lacking the protection of peoples’ rights must be neglected and superseded. Yet, I cannot ignore the rights of revolution. I gave credence to the principle of majority rule along the separation of legislative and executive powers in a government. In addition to the government dominancy, my ideology states that compulsion should be precluded from occurring as people should have their own choice of religion and not reflect on what the ruler’s beliefs are. I see the same thing when I contemplate churches as they must not pressurize their members. Aside from this, contrary to pre-existing concepts, I concluded that we are born without built in mental content, meaning knowledge is retrieved through sensory experience. To summarize, given my beliefs, theories, or arguments that I put forward in political philosophy, you may ponder, “wherefore did John Locke form such beliefs? Pursuing this further, my convictions gave importance to people’s rights as I comprehended that we are capable of reasoning and governing ourselves, and any government that mistreats or denies our natural rights must be overlooked through revolutionary ideas put forward to them as well as the social contract, which forms relations between peoples’ natural and legal